Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 9
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    +69Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

    In line with other reports of this type.

    Praiseoutstandingeffectivelyexcellentvery effectiveclearvery wellstrongwell designed
    Criticismconcernsweaknesseslimited

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    FindingsLeadership positive critical
    • Findings386w+47
    • Leadership1006w+70

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No strong criticism found.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    9
    Words of findings
    1,380
    longer than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 43, typical 45
    Average sentence
    19 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    7%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 28%Leadership 72%

    Full report text

    Dance & Drama College

    Dates of inspection: 27 and 28 May 2004 reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated.

    p.1

    Dance & Drama College

    dance and drama colleges in receipt of awards allocated by the Department for Education and Skills.

    p.2

    Dance & Drama College

    Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted web site (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

    p.2

    Basic information about the college

    Type of college: Performing arts college

    p.4

    Basic information about the college

    Birkbeck Centre Birkbeck Road Kent Address of college:

    p.4

    Basic information about the college

    DA14 4DE Telephone number: 020 8300 6004

    p.4

    Basic information about the college

    Name of reporting inspector: David Hornbrook HMI

    p.4

    Basic information about the college

    Dates of inspection: 27 and 28 May 2004 Inspection Report Bird College Dance & Drama College

    p.4

    Part A: Summary

    Bird College is an independent, dance-based, performing arts college, founded in 1954, which is based at four sites in and around Sidcup, Kent, around 30 minutes by rail from central London. The college is a company limited by guarantee and wholly owned by a charity, the Doreen Bird Foundation.

    p.5

    Part A: Summary

    Bird College offers a three-year professional dance and theatre arts course leading to the national diploma in music theatre, and some of the students are in receipt of financial awards from the Department for Education and Skills. The college also offers a degree course validated by the University of Greenwich.

    p.5

    Part A: Summary

    At the time of the inspection in May 2004, 80 students were enrolled on the three-year diploma course. Some 25 students out of 27 in the first year of the course, 25 students out of 28 in the second year and 20 out of 25 in the third year were in receipt of Department for Education and Skills dance and drama awards.

    p.5

    Part A: Summary

    There are nine full-time teachers, 12 part-time teachers and additional guest teachers working on the diploma course, supported by two full-time and four part-time administrative staff, and a part-time physiotherapist.

    p.5

    Part A: Summary

    The last full inspection of the Bird College took place in June 2002, when achievement and standards, and the quality of education and training in dance and theatre performance were graded outstanding, and leadership and management were graded good. The June 2002 report can be downloaded from the OfSTED website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

    p.5

    Part A: Summary

    On the basis of the short inspection carried out in May 2004, inspectors are satisfied that the outstanding standards reported at the last inspection have been maintained. Inspection Report Bird College Dance & Drama College

    p.5

    Part B: Leadership and management

    Inspectors judged leadership and management to be outstanding ( Grade 1 )

    p.6

    Strengths

     strong leadership with a clear strategic vision

    p.6

    Strengths

     many improvements since the last inspection

    p.6

    Weaknesses

     too little use of data to inform planning

    p.6

    Weaknesses

    1. The college aims to provide students with opportunities to develop a range of high- level performance skills, and to use these in pursuit of professional excellence; it continues to be successful in this aim. Strategic aims are very clear, and managers and staff share a clear view of the nature of the training and of the college’s role in preparing students for employment.

    p.6

    Weaknesses

    2. The course and the college continue to be led and managed very well. The governing body has been strengthened since the last inspection; six non-executive directors now supplement the chief executive and the finance director, and there are staff and student representatives. A number of governors’ sub-committees oversee aspects of the college’s work. Governors share responsibility for strategic planning with the chief executive, including major plans for the relocation of the college in Chatham. A small management team takes responsibility for operational matters; this is led by the chief executive, who is also the artistic director and is closely involved in monitoring the quality of the training. There are programme leaders for both the diploma and degree courses, and each major area of work, for example, ballet, has a subject leader. The college is working towards greater clarity in the management relationship between programme and subject leaders. The diploma

    p.6

    Weaknesses

    programme leader provides effective leadership for the course team, monitors students’ progress and directly oversees the delivery of the course. Overall, management arrangements are very effective, allowing the chief executive to carry out her strategic role while, at the same time, keeping herself informed about the students’ progress.

    p.6

    Weaknesses

    3. Staff communicate effectively. There are regular meetings of staff at all levels. Heads of subjects and programme leaders meet weekly as a group with the chief executive; the programme board (diploma team) meets every term. Planning, quality assurance, and Inspection Report Bird College Dance & Drama College

    p.6

    Weaknesses

    27 and 28 May 2004 Page 3 students’ welfare and progress are agenda items for the meetings of teachers in subject areas and for the meetings of the programme board; there are also meetings each term attended by all staff. The auditions panel, the committee for appeals over financial awards and the committee for appeals against assessment outcomes are formally constituted as part of the management structure. Grounds for appeal are clearly defined and disseminated. These arrangements protect the rights of students. The committee structure is well designed and works effectively.

    p.7

    Weaknesses

    4. The staff handbook contains policies for equality of opportunity and for the health and safety of students and employees. The college actively promotes equality of opportunity and is involved in activities aimed at widening participation in training for the performing arts. It runs short courses in the Easter and summer holidays for a variety of students, including some with learning difficulties. Some of these students consider training in performing arts and wish to improve their skills prior to an application. Such courses also provide valuable opportunities for college students to extend their expertise and experience by helping potential applicants to improve the standard of their work. However, although the gender and ethnicity of applicants and students are monitored, the college has still to establish procedures for monitoring progress in implementing its equal opportunities policies policy.

    p.7

    Weaknesses

    A short disability statement makes clear the college’s commitment to the appropriate treatment of applicants with disabilities. A disability access audit is being carried out in preparation for the creation of an action plan in line with the requirements of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (SENDA) 2001.

    p.7

    Weaknesses

    5. The college continues to respond to concerns raised by the students. Students’ views of the course are sought through annual questionnaires and there are student representatives at managers’ meetings. Staff discuss concerns about the quality of aspects of the course at their meetings and take action to effect improvements. They are aware of, and seek to apply, high standards in professional training. Teachers observe each other’s classes and provide informal feedback; training is programmed for summer 2004 to support heads of faculty in a more formal programme of lesson observation. A staff appraisal process, which encompasses both full and part-time members of staff, has been piloted since the last inspection. There are excellent opportunities for development for all staff. By the end of 2004, 19 staff will have gained certificates of education after participating in an ongoing course run at the site by

    p.7

    Weaknesses

    Christ Church College, Canterbury. The college has also supported teachers on voice and Pilates training.

    p.7

    Weaknesses

    6. Quality assurance procedures have been significantly improved since the last inspection. Quality assurance is now a standing item on programme board meetings and a wide variety of student data are now readily available. For example, the reasons why a few students leave the course before completion are recorded, summarised and presented to managers. Destination data are recorded and charted in great detail, although the use of these data to identify trends and inform planning is underdeveloped. The self-assessment report sent to inspectors before the inspection was a full and informative document with narrative well-supported by charts. Strengths and weaknesses were clearly, and often accurately, identified, although the key section on achievement and standards lacked incisiveness. Inspection Report Bird College Dance & Drama College

    p.7

    Weaknesses

    27 and 28 May 2004 Page 4 Training is programmed for summer 2004 in order to help teachers review the work of subjects and participate more fully in the college’s self-assessment process.

    p.8

    Weaknesses

    7. Managers work to an annual budget, approved by trustees, who receive three reports a year, including a financial report and a budget for the year ahead. The college now has a five-year financial plan, and detailed relocation costings based on a comprehensive feasibility study. The college manages its resources effectively and has reserve funds to protect it against unforeseen variations. Inspection Report Bird College Dance & Drama College

    p.8

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion