Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Limm

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Limm

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisegood progressrigorousflourisheffectivelymake good progressconfidentlypositiveclear
Criticismlowlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings520w+53
  • Leadership129w+73
  • What needs to improve119w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
751
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs Keenan Headteacher St Anne’s Catholic Primary School Lowe Street Birmingham West Midlands B12 OER

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 16 October 2007 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on gifted and talented provision within history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Overall, standards are average but pupils make good progress given their very low attainment on entry.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The low attainment on entry is partly explained by the above average proportion of pupils who have learning difficulties and disabilities and also by the significant number who start school at an early stage of acquiring English.  The good general focus that the school places on helping pupils acquire proficiency in English means that work in history generally improves each succeeding year.  More able pupils are given satisfactory support but still, they could do could do better with more focused teaching offering greater challenge.  Pupils’ personal development is satisfactory but this masks good progress, from a low base on entry, in the ability of many pupils to speak confidently and ask pertinent questions about their history topics. Pupils have a clear grasp of right and wrong and can apply this distinction to events and personalities in history.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The good progress that pupils make in history is a direct response to the good teaching and support provided by staff. This has been achieved by sharing good practice and careful planning.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 This work is now being strengthened by the Deputy Headteacher who is temporarily acting as subject co-ordinator and who is driving through more rigorous assessment and tracking procedures in the subject. This is already having an impact in terms of good quality marking and comments in pupils’ books.  Resources are good and there are good opportunities for staff to visit other schools to gain further ideas. The co-ordinator rightly identifies the current basic planning for progression in skills as an area for improvement.  Support staff are used well to enable pupils with learning difficulties to make the most of learning opportunities in lessons. Pupils respond well to their history lessons and are developing their history learning skills well.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The school is currently in the process of reviewing and re-shaping its history curriculum to enable more cross-curricular links to be developed and for history to act as a key vehicle for enriching basic skills work. This review is beginning to impact on lesson activities but requires further development to ensure the planned links fully respect the requirements of the subjects concerned.  The school also is aware that more could be done to use the experiences and resources of people in the local community, and its history, to enable pupils to understand their world better.  Recently there has been a welcome increase in the provision of information and communications technology (ICT) in the school, especially interactive whiteboards. However, opportunities for pupils to interact with the whiteboards are limited.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management of history are satisfactory.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The subject leader has focused well on driving general school improvement through introducing more rigorous assessment and tracking procedures which are also making a positive impact in history.  There are coherent plans for further key improvements once the next subject leader is in place, such as driving forward stronger curriculum links and making further use of the local community as a history resource. Self evaluation within the subject is satisfactory.

p.3

Subject issue – gifted and talented

More able pupils are supported by the school, but have not benefited from a thorough review of what they need if they are to flourish as able young historians. Teachers do adjust the curriculum to meet the needs of different children but not enough to challenge more able historians effectively.

p.3

Inclusion

 There is no apparent difference between the performance of boys and girls in history. The needs of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are well served by appropriately trained learning support assistants.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing, further, the current review of the curriculum so that the role of history as a key vehicle for improving basic skills is strengthened  ensuring that the needs of more able historians are met effectively  enriching the history curriculum by tapping the experiences of local people and their histories  ensuring that pupils use electronic whiteboards in a more interactive way.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion