Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
E5 8PH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 14
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Catrina Tilbury The Headteacher Nightingale Primary School Rendlesham Road Hackney London E5 8PH
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 28 February 2008, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please could you pass my thanks to the staff, children and governors who spoke to me.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
As a result of the inspection in February 2007, the school was asked to: raise achievement in mathematics and science by ensuring that pupils understand key vocabulary and develop their investigative skills; make teaching consistently good through rigorous monitoring and support where it is weaker; appoint an educational visits coordinator to make sure that risk assessments for trips are in place.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Achievement has risen more in science than in mathematics. In 2007, overall standards rose at Key Stages 1 and 2, particularly for girls. This represented improved achievement during Key Stage 1. At Key Stage 2, progress improved greatly in science because both boys and girls did better. It improved in English, due to girls’ better performance. In mathematics, girls made improved progress but too many boys still underachieved. Since then the school has kept closer records of each pupil’s progress in mathematics and provided targeted intervention earlier in Key Stage 2 for those who were falling behind the nationally expected levels. There is frequent discussion of each pupil’s progress and pupils new to English receive Prospects Learning Services Ltd 132-138 High Street Bromley Kent BR1 1EZ T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 8313 7760 Direct F 020 8464 3393 support with scientific and mathematical vocabulary. These sharper uses of
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
assessment and intervention have contributed to improved achievement across year groups since September although inconsistencies remain. The use of more experiments and greater teaching time in science, and of weekly problem solving days, has also contributed to improved achievement. Pupils enjoy the increased amount of experimental work in science which has helped them to understand scientific concepts.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
In the Foundation Stage, children also develop their mathematics and their knowledge and understanding of the world soundly through problem solving activities. The 2007 Foundation Stage Profile results show a mixed picture of improvement and decline since 2006, although the absence of moderation hampers direct comparisons. Results reflect the school’s focused work that has helped them to improve substantially in using numbers as labels for counting, but remain low for counting and for knowledge and understanding of the world. More recent records show increased tracking of children’s progress and that it is rising in these areas, although there are some for whom progress is not as fast as it should be.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Teaching quality has improved although it is not consistently good. In science and mathematics, local authority support, which is provided by The Learning Trust, assisted the subject co-ordinators in introducing new materials and approaches that have raised teaching quality. The new scheme of work for mathematics has supported teachers’ lesson planning and teaching across the breadth of the curriculum. In science, more lessons effectively develop pupils’ experimental skills and scientific understanding.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
The school’s evidence shows that teaching throughout the school has improved in terms of using more problem solving activities and more probing questioning to extend pupils’ explanation skills. These were evident in lessons and work seen. The working walls and displays attest to the focus on subject-specific vocabulary that was highlighted as an area for improvement at the last inspection.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
The school’s lesson observations have identified accurately some areas for development for which support has subsequently been given and improvement made. Nevertheless, observations are not focused closely enough on every pupil’s progress so are sometimes generous or do not identify the most important points for improving satisfactory teaching to good. Development planning includes setting up a system for frequent observation across years and subjects, and staff have formed teams for peer coaching based on lesson observation. Regular joint observations between the school and The Learning Trust concentrating, on continuous improvement in identified areas, have recently been set in motion, following a lull in observations during the headteacher’s absence due to family illness last term. They recognise that improvements in some areas have been either inconsistent or not fast enough. The school has not been clear about the extent of the support from The
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Learning Trust this year, since it was judged at the last inspection to no longer require significant improvement.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
The school has appointed an educational visits co-ordinator. Risk assessments for the large number of school visits are carefully recorded. They place a stronger focus on the travel risks than other aspects. Pupils are aware of risks involved in visits and how to minimise them. They report that they feel safe.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion