Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Kekshan Salaria
- Postcode verified
E7 9DA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Similarly, in Year 3 the teacher’s high expectations and high quality exposition enabled all groups to make good progress . p.3
- Some very good and exciting teaching was observed in Year 5 when for example, pupils made exceptional progress in acquiring knowledge relating to the rhythm and structure of poetry. p.3
- The headteacher provides very strong leadership and knows the school well because of rigorous and systematic monitoring of teaching, learning and achievement. p.4
- She is supported very well by the deputy headteacher and staff and there is a clear sense of collective responsibility and teamwork. p.4
- Pupils enjoy their time at St James and show interest and enthusiasm for learning. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,391
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Nina Panayis The Acting Headteacher St James' CofE Junior School Tower Hamlets Road Forest Gate London E7 9DA
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
Following my visit to your school on 27 and 28 February 2008, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in February 2007. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
Progress since being subject to special measures – good
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
Progress since previous monitoring visit – good
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
Newly qualified teachers may be appointed subject to contact with HMI.
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.
p.1
JUNIOR SCHOOL
I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors, the Diocese of Chelmsford and the Director for Children and Young People's Services for Newham.
p.1
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Prospects Learning Services Ltd 132-138 High Street Bromley Kent BR1 1EZ T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 8313 7760 Direct F 020 8464 3393
p.1
Evidence
During the visit 10 lessons or parts of lessons were observed. Pupils were observed around the school. Discussions were held with the acting headteacher, a range of middle and senior managers, pupils from the school council, the chair of governors, and the school improvement partner. A range of school documents were scrutinised.
p.2
Context
Three members of staff have left the school since the last monitoring inspection. At the time of this visit, two teaching posts were being covered by supply teachers. The school hopes to interview and appoint candidates to these posts by the beginning of the summer term. The governing body and local authority (LA) are currently exploring the possibility of appointing an executive headteacher for St James and a neighbouring school.
p.2
Achievement and standards
School data currently suggest that standards throughout the school are rising. This is due to the improvements in leadership and management, rigorous use of data to inform planning and teaching that caters for the needs of all pupils. Overall, standards remain well below national expectations, but during this monitoring inspection many pupils observed in the core subjects, particularly the more able, were producing work of a standard at least in line with national expectations, and occasionally above. Progress made by pupils in the lessons observed demonstrates that achievement continues to improve at a satisfactory rate overall. The rate of progress pupils make between classes, a weakness noted during the last monitoring visit is more consistent, reflecting some of the improvements made in teaching. Pupils in six out of the ten lessons observed made good progress because of good teaching.
p.2
Achievement and standards
The quality of pupils’ writing is improving. Many of the pupils’ ability to analyse and evaluate texts is improving, as is their use of literary vocabulary. The organisation of extended writing demonstrates a more systematic approach to the planning of written work and there is evidence of increasing opportunities for pupils to develop their writing skills in other subject, for example, in history.
p.2
Achievement and standards
The recently appointed co-ordinator of provision for pupils with English as an Additional Language is making a real difference. For example, she has assessed pupils, has a timetable of support organised on a six week block for each year group and is enhancing links with parents.
p.2
Achievement and standards
Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in February 2007: Raise standards and improve pupils’ achievements in English, mathematics and science – satisfactory. Increase opportunities for pupils to develop their writing skills in other subject areas – satisfactory.
p.2
Personal development and well-being
Pupils’ personal development and well-being are good and this aspect continues to be a strong feature of the school. Pupils enjoy their time at St James and show interest and enthusiasm for learning. Clear expectations of conduct lead to good behaviour in lessons and around the school. Pupils speak about their school as a place where they feel safe and have someone to turn to if they have a problem. Pupils’ attitude in the upper Key Stage 2 classes is particularly good; they are welcoming and courteous to visitors, listen attentively and ask thoughtful questions. During group work, pupils work together co-operatively and maintain their concentration and interest. When teachers call the class together their response is instant. Despite a small number of lessons being dull, pupils make every effort to concentrate and follow their teacher’s instructions. When working in groups and pairs, pupils co-operate well and shared equipment sensibly.
p.3
Quality of provision
Teaching and learning are satisfactory and this has resulted in pupils making more progress than they have in the recent past The school has worked hard in continuing to improve the quality of teaching and is well supported by the Local Authority with the provision of extra consultant time. Overall, the majority of teachers are now demonstrating a marked degree of confidence in organising and structuring their lessons. All classrooms are organised well to support pupils’ independent learning. The cultural diversity of the school is reflected in displays and resources, for example, the majority of classes have displays on ‘language of the month’.
p.3
Quality of provision
Planning has improved and is far more consistent from lesson to lesson. There is generally a clear reference to learning objectives and expected outcomes. Teachers are beginning to be explicit about the learning that will take place. Some very good and exciting teaching was observed in Year 5 when for example, pupils made exceptional progress in acquiring knowledge relating to the rhythm and structure of poetry. Similarly, in Year 3 the teacher’s high expectations and high quality exposition enabled all groups to make good progress .
p.3
Quality of provision
Some better questioning techniques are starting to be seen which assess, support and extend pupils’ learning, but this good feature is not consistent. In some lessons it is still too easy for pupils to disengage because the teacher does not target questions to individuals but relies on volunteers putting their hands up. Some teachers accept pupils’ responses to questions which are often brief and expressed in partial sentences.
p.3
Quality of provision
A good system of assessment is in place to record information on pupils’ learning, which is well understood and used by the senior leadership team. The senior leaders meet with each teacher termly to discuss individual pupils’ progress. Underachieving pupils are identified and intervention programmes implemented. Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in February 2007: Improve the consistency and demand of teaching and learning throughout the school – good Track the progress of pupils more closely and set more challenging targets – good.
p.3
Leadership and management
The headteacher provides very strong leadership and knows the school well because of rigorous and systematic monitoring of teaching, learning and achievement. She is supported very well by the deputy headteacher and staff and there is a clear sense of collective responsibility and teamwork. The headteacher is receiving good support especially from her senior team who are growing in confidence and increasingly providing the necessary support and leadership to others in the school. The focus for all managers is now very clearly on improving the quality of teaching and learning and thus the standards achieved by pupils. Effective subject leadership, including the first class management of provision for pupils with learning difficulties is leading to improved standards. The governing body, well led by the chair of governors, has received training resulting in greater understanding of what the school is doing to
p.4
Leadership and management
improve and how to find out. The challenge for the school now is to ensure that the increased rate of improvement seen on this visit is maintained and that the good practice is embedded across the work of the school.
p.4
Leadership and management
Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in February 2007: Ensure that all those with leadership and management roles can properly account for the standards of pupils’ work and the quality of educational provision within their areas of responsibility – good
p.4
External support
The LA continues to provide good specialist support for a number of subjects, in particular mathematics and literacy. This is judiciously delivered to take account of improvements made and to address remaining areas of weakness. The LA should now ensure that the school receives the closest possible support in the collaboration between stakeholders on all aspects regarding the future of the school.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion