Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ruth James

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth James

  • Postcode verified

    HG3 3NR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+94Very positivemore positive than 99% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery wellhighly effectiveoutstandingmake good progresswell designedenthusiasticsupportive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings376w+93
  • Leadership204w+74
  • What needs to improve124w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
670
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L Paisley Headteacher Markington Church of England Primary School High Street Markington Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 3NR

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 28 November to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases, and the range of learning experiences and status of SC1.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, students’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards are above average. All pupils have achieved at least the expected standard in science by age 11 for the last three years. For each of these years the proportion of pupils achieving level 5 in national tests was above average.  Pupils make good progress in science during their time in the school.  Science contributes very well to pupils’ excellent personal development. Examples seen during the inspection included several pupils talking about their science work in assembly in front of the whole school, and pupils working together and cooperating well in groups.  Behaviour in the lessons observed was very good.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers are enthusiastic, encouraging and supportive.  Good use is made of practical and investigative work.  Pupils clearly enjoy science. They are motivated, attentive, engaged and keen to do well.  Lessons include a good range of activities.  Teachers make some good use of question and answer sessions to revise previous knowledge, check understanding and consolidate learning.  Some good use of ICT was observed in a lesson about teeth, where short video clips provided very clear visual illustrations which effectively reinforced learning.  Pupils’ work is marked regularly and their progress is tracked.  Learning materials are well designed and of good quality.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The curriculum in science is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 There are excellent enrichment activities. These include science days with a variety of workshops led by external experts.  Science teaching is enhanced by many relevant educational visits.  An environmental area is used very well.  Appropriate attention is given to cross curricular links.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Operational management is highly effective.  There is a clear focus on ensuring that every pupil achieves the best that he or she is capable of.  Staff know their pupils very well as individuals, and use this knowledge well in their planning.  Long and medium term planning documentation is comprehensive and of good quality.  A systematic scrutiny of pupils’ science work is carried out, with good feedback to teachers.  Appropriate attention is given to specific management issues, such as changes to mixed year group classes, to ensure that all pupils receive their full entitlement in science.  Moderation is carried out to ensure that assessments are appropriately marked.

p.2

Subject issues

 Good use is made of practical work and pupils get plenty of practice planning investigations.  Pupils develop good skills in handling basic apparatus and carrying out experiments.  Appropriate general transition arrangements for pupils moving on to secondary school are in place. In addition, this year there are plans for Year 6 pupils to attend science workshops at one of the local secondary schools.  Mixed year groups in some classes minimises the need for specific transition arrangements from reception to Year 1, and Year 2 to Year 3.

p.2

Inclusion

 There is excellent integration of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.  Teachers and teaching assistants pay particular care to the needs of pupils with specific learning difficulties and/or disabilities.  Teachers are astute in their observations of individual pupils, giving appropriate praise, guidance and direction, so helping them to develop a wide range of skills.  Excellent attention and support are given to the personal development of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities through their science work.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the need to:

 improve the clarity of learning objectives and the consistency of lesson planning  in marking pupils’ science work consider increasing the use of specific comments and guidance that will help pupils improve their work  further develop the tracking of pupil progress to highlight those pupils who are on track to achieve their target level, those who are underachieving and those who are likely to exceed their target.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the need to:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the need to:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion