Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russell Jordan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russell Jordan

  • Postcode verified

    BS1 5UA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionalhighly effectiveexceptionallysuccessfullywell-plannedextremelyimproved
Criticismweaknessesnot alwayslowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings615w+72
  • Leadership77w+50
  • What needs to improve96w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
786
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Mr Keith Elliott Principal College Green Centre City of Bristol College St George’s Road Bristol BS1 5UA

p.1

of post 16 providers

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 26 and 27 November 2007 to look at work in level 3 provision.

p.1

of post 16 providers

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

of post 16 providers

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, and observation of five lessons.

p.1

of post 16 providers

The overall effectiveness of level 3 provision was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards are satisfactory, but achievement is good considering the low prior attainment of students on entry to level 3 study. Over the last three years success rates overall have shown a rising trend but are broadly average compared to similar providers. Success rates in AS and A levels remain broadly average, but pass rates improved in 2007. Success rates in ‘other level 3 qualifications’, including BTEC nationals, are below average, but they are high in NVQs.

p.1

Achievement and standards

High grade achievement in GCE AS and A levels remains above the national average for general further education and tertiary colleges and is improving. Students with the lowest prior attainment make exceptional progress from their starting points on entry to the college. However the college recognises that higher attaining students Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk do not always achieve as well as they can. National performance data systems placed the college in the top 24% of providers in 2006/07.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of level 3 provision

The quality of teaching and learning at level 3, including academic guidance is good. Teachers plan lessons well to accommodate students’ different learning styles and prior attainment, and successfully promote independent learning. They use their expert subject knowledge well and provide a variety of activities and resources to engage students successfully and make their learning enjoyable. Teachers benefit from a well-planned professional development programme, including the continuing development of links with employers and other placement providers.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of level 3 provision

The good guidance and support provided is highly valued by the students. The college takes good care to ensure students are on the right courses. Students settle into their courses well and they are given a highly effective introduction to the course work and study requirements at level 3.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of level 3 provision

The tracking and monitoring of individual student progress is good. Students show good awareness of their progress towards challenging and stretching targets. The college fully involves students in determining their targets. Students consider the support of their teachers, their individual academic review and the detailed feedback on their work very valuable in helping them to achieve as well they can.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The extent to which programmes and activities meet students’ needs and interests is outstanding. There is a very wide choice of both A and AS levels and of vocational courses. This enables the college to meet extremely well the wide range of prior attainment and aptitude of their students and their future career aspirations.

p.2

Leadership and management of level 3 provision

Leadership and management are good. Self-assessment is outstanding. Leaders and managers have a very clear understanding of the college’s strengths and weaknesses. The rigorous and timely use of data at all levels of management to evaluate performance in level 3 provision is at the heart of a culture of continuous improvement, leading to highly-focussed improvement planning. Leaders and managers have well-considered plans to further improve levels of performance. As a result there is good capacity to improve.

p.2

Inclusion

Inclusion is outstanding. Recruitment to level 3 provision is exceptionally inclusive, reflecting the wide range of students’ prior attainment at GCSE and their varied and often specialised support needs. The college has a higher proportion of students from minority ethnic heritage than in Bristol as a whole. The college is keenly aware of how well individual students achieve. Teachers monitor and track individual students’ progress rigorously and take timely and highly appropriate action to tackle under-achievement.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 maintaining the focus on improving retention in level 3 provision overall  fully implementing plans to ensure that students with higher levels of attainment on entry to the college make better progress at level 3.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop level 3 provision in the college.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/Local Learning Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion