Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Beaver

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Beaver

  • Postcode verified

    DE14 3DR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelyenjoyvery wellgood progresspositiveeffectiveclear
Criticismnot yetweaknessesbelowfall behindlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings642w+37
  • Leadership135w+3
  • What needs to improve166w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
926
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Mr Don Smith Headteacher Paget High School Burton Road Branston Burton-on-Trent DE14 3DR

p.1

of post 16 providers

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29-30 October 2007 to look at work in level 3 provision.

p.1

of post 16 providers

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

of post 16 providers

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, and observation of lessons.

p.1

of post 16 providers

The overall effectiveness of level 3 provision was judged to be satisfactory, with many good features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Students enter the sixth form with standards below those found nationally. They make satisfactory progress, but AS-level and A-level results are, overall, below national averages. Attainment of grades A and B is well below national results.  The large majority of students complete the courses they begin and gain at least pass grades in the subjects they study.  Increasing numbers continue into the sixth form. In 2007, almost two in three students stayed on – the highest percentage in recent years. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is generally good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers’ subject knowledge is very good, and they use it well to plan lessons effectively and maintain a brisk learning pace. Too much talking by teachers sometimes restricts discussion in the limited lesson time available. Fewer lessons in most subjects in Year 13 compared with Year 12 limits Year 13 students’ access to good teaching.  Relationships with teachers are very good. Students respond well to the teaching and say they enjoy learning.  Students receive helpful guidance and direction about how to improve their work. Teachers are very committed to students, and give individual help and advice freely in and out of lessons.  Teachers, tutors and the head of the sixth form monitor progress carefully with the help of a new system which compares students’ current performance with that expected from their previous attainment. Students say they find the half-termly reviews helpful. They know the academic targets that they are

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

aiming to reach, and their work is helpfully assessed and marked, usually with clear indications of how it could be improved. The new system has not run long enough for its impact on achievement to be evaluated.  Individuals who fall behind are supported well. In addition to teachers and tutors, a recently appointed teaching assistant is fully deployed in the sixth form to give individual help to those requiring assistance in organising their time and managing their workload.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The curriculum for level 3 courses has improved considerably and is good.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The range of courses includes some valuable vocational options, reflecting the school’s specialist status for business and enterprise and local employment opportunities. Students say they enjoy learning and are sure their studies will benefit their future educational and career aspirations. They find induction to level 3 courses informative.  Fewer lessons are timetabled in most subjects in Year 13 than in Year 12, on the grounds that Year 13 students are more mature and able to use private study time more effectively. However, achievement is not yet better than satisfactory.  Regular educational visits take place to enhance learning.

p.2

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of level 3 provision are good.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Leaders have a shrewd understanding of the quality of performance and are intent on raising achievement and standards. Many more students are gaining the confidence to stay on to take level 3 courses. The curriculum has improved considerably. Weaknesses in subject leadership have been overcome. Generally good teaching ensures good progress in most lessons. The accommodation has been improved. There is good capacity to improve provision and outcomes of level 3 courses further.  Collaboration with other educational providers extends students’ choice of courses. However, the timetables of different providers are not coordinated well enough to enable every student to attend all the necessary lessons in different locations. A system to guarantee the quality of education in partner institutions is not yet in place.

p.2

Inclusion

 The school meets the needs of girls and boys from different social and ethnic backgrounds very well. Students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities achieve well in line with others. Students get on well together and attitudes in lessons and to the school are very positive. Students have equal access to level 3 courses.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring that the new system to track students’ progress is monitored and evaluated, so that changes can be made, as necessary, to increase its impact on raising standards  comparing and evaluating the impact on achievement and standards of providing most Year 13 courses with fewer lessons than are allocated to Year 12. If necessary, provide additional tuition when resources can be made available  making collaboration with other educational partners fully effective by coordinating the timetables of different providers to avoid students missing lessons, and establish a system to guarantee the quality of the education received by Paget High School students in partner institutions.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop level 3 provision in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/Local Learning Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion