Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Jan 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Young

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentsuccessfullyvery welleffectivegood progressnurturinglovepositive
Criticismnot alwayspoorlyweaknesseslacknot consistentlynot successfulnot consistentnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionFindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings749w+41
  • Leadership263w+14
  • What needs to improve75w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,068
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 03 December to look at work in physical education (PE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the continuity of learning between key stages.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

The visit provided valuable information, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ reports and observation of two lessons, and two ‘take 10’ sessions. I also observed play leaders working with children at lunchtime.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education

The overall effectiveness of PE was judged satisfactory with good features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory when set against their starting points, which are satisfactory on entry to the school.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards observed during the visit were broadly satisfactory. All pupils make satisfactory and sometimes good progress towards individual lesson objectives. However, their achievement in the four strands of PE Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Mrs Benford Headteacher St John’s Church of England Voluntary Aided Junior and Infant School Golcar Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD7 4QQ was not consistent. Pupils were better at demonstrating their knowledge and understanding of fitness and health, but less adept at acquiring and developing skills or selecting and applying these skills successfully in context.  Pupils’ personal development through PE is good. Staff assume a nurturing approach, which pupils respond to with good behaviour and a willingness to learn. Pupils readily admit they ‘love PE’. Participation rates are high; pupils collaborate very well, and act responsibly when asked to work independently. There are good leadership opportunities for older pupils through the play leader scheme.  Pupils understand, and adhere to health and safety guidance and have a good awareness of the benefits of following healthy lifestyles. The school has gained the Healthy Schools Gold Award, and the Activemark

p.1

Achievement and standards

Silver Award in recognition of its work in this area.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

In the small number of lessons seen, the quality of teaching and learning was satisfactory overall, with some good teaching.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Staff work very hard to help pupils secure gains in their skills, knowledge, and understanding of PE. The training staff have undergone has increased their knowledge and understanding, and boosted the competence and confidence with which they deliver the subject.  Positive reinforcement and meticulous planning are commonplace, though not always consistently applied, and this can lead to some discrepancy in the quality of feedback, and the suitability of challenges provided for pupils. Using varied teaching approaches helps staff to tailor their teaching to the needs of individual pupils who respond particularly well when they were given open-ended challenges and some autonomy.  No formal assessments or tracking procedures exist. This lack of records means it is difficult for staff to substantiate their view that pupils’ standards and achievement are above average. One member of staff is trialling the use of core tasks as a way of gauging pupils’

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

achievement in relation to the National Curriculum Attainment Targets, with some success. A traffic light based self-assessment system was also trialled during the inspection. There is no target setting and most pupils do not have a clear idea of how well they were doing, or what they need to do to improve further.  A less successful aspect of teaching and learning included the time it took for pupils to settle down when requested to by the teacher.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is good, with excellent elements. It is wide- ranging, balanced, and offers good extra curricular opportunities.  During their time in the school, pupils experience each of the six activity areas of the PE National Curriculum. Pupils receive a minimum of two hours PE a week. In addition, there is a well-constructed daily 10-minute PE themed session, which all pupils participate in enthusiastically. Pupils take advantage of an excellent and diverse extra curricular programme, and benefit from a residential experience to Castleton, which features a range of outdoor and adventurous activities. A play leader and senior pupils facilitate structured games activities at lunchtime, which are very popular.  The schools involvement with the School Sport Partnership Programme enables pupils to benefit from festivals of sport, multi-skills coaching, and access to a range of resources. Staff have benefited from excellent

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

training, networking, curriculum, and management development opportunities, which has improved their ability to deliver the subject successfully. Some good links exist with local and professional clubs who provide coaching to pupils.  The school has a good range of PE facilities, equipment and resources, although the fields drain poorly, and are often out of use during the autumn term. The school also makes good use of a local swimming pool and sports centre.

p.3

Leadership and management of PE

Leadership and management of PE are satisfactory, with good features.

p.3

Leadership and management of PE

 The subject leader is hard working and has good planning skills. There is a general focus on raising pupil standards and achievement, through effective teaching and learning and a suitable curriculum, but no specific strategy for using assessment to boost learning and achievement.  Staff deploy available resources and equipment well. Suitable programmes of study and appropriate health and safety protocols are in place. Staff receive training to improve their knowledge and understanding of PE, and good practice is disseminated during regular meetings.  Self-evaluation is largely accurate, and the subject leader is aware of most weaknesses in provision. She monitors teachers’ planning and their end of year evaluations of pupils, but does not monitor the quality of teaching and learning. Senior management have not monitored the quality of teaching and learning in PE either. Assessment procedures are under-developed and leave staff exposed when evaluating pupils’

p.3

Leadership and management of PE

achievement and standards.  The capacity for further improvement is good, given the enhancements secured to the curriculum, transition arrangements, teachers’ knowledge and understanding of PE and pupils’ personal development and well-being.

p.3

Subject issue- Continuity of learning between key stages

 Effective arrangements exist to promote continuity of learning, with staff from Key Stages 1 and 2 regularly meeting to share pupil information. Key Stage 2 and 3 staff liaise by joint working on bridging units, curriculum development, and training for primary school staff.  Festivals of sport, gifted and talented camps and multi-skills coaching, provide further opportunities for some of the high school staff to familiarise themselves with the Key Stage 2 pupils.

p.4

Inclusion

 Suitable arrangements exist to promote inclusion in PE. Support staff work effectively with targeted pupils, and staff use a range of teaching strategies to make the curriculum accessible to all pupils. Planning to meet the needs of different pupils was evident, although staff did not always apply it in practice. A gifted and talented audit has taken place and a register established.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 devising a system to assess, record and report pupil progress  monitoring the quality of teaching and learning.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop Physical Education in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion