Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Green

  • Postcode verified

    B28 9JJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery welloutstandingmake good progressimprovedextremelyhigh qualityenjoypositive
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings768w+85
  • Leadership115w+61
  • What needs to improve222w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,070
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Jones Headteacher St. Ambrose Barlow Catholic Primary School Shirley Road Birmingham West Midlands B28 9JJ

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

Thank you for the hospitality and co-operation of your staff during my visit on 15 November 2007 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of ICT, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of ICT on whole-school improvement.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with your deputy headteacher, your subject co-ordinator, Year 2 and Year 6 pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of a Year 1 and a Year 4/5 lessons in the computer suite.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards in ICT are good and are rising. Achievement is good. The contribution to pupils’ personal development and well-being is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 By Year 6, standards are above expectations and the achievement of pupils is good. This represents good improvement since the Section 5 inspection of 2005, when standards and achievement in ICT were judged to be satisfactory and an issue for further improvement.  Standards in ICT are rising throughout the school because of the impact of improvements in teaching, learning and resources.  ICT has a good impact on raising standards in other subjects. Very good examples were observed of ICT raising standards in English. ICT is also used well to support mathematics, science, art, history, French, music and religious education.  Pupils enjoy using computers, interactive whiteboards and digital cameras. They are not afraid to experiment should things go wrong and they support each other extremely well to overcome problems. From a very early age, pupils are aware that to make mistakes when using ICT is a learning opportunity that should be viewed as a positive

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teaching of ICT is good, and at times outstanding, and has improved since the 2005 inspection. Teachers’ subject knowledge is good.  Learning objectives of lessons are shared with pupils, so that they understand the purpose of the lesson and can review their success at the end.  Teaching assistants support pupils well and ensue work is matched to individual needs.  Pupils are very well managed and consequently work very well together, in a calm and purposeful atmosphere. They co-operate and share ideas with enthusiasm. However, when pupils work in groups of three in the suite, not everyone in the group has the opportunity for hands-on use of the keyboard and mouse.  Good use is made of interactive whiteboards to add impact and interest to lessons.  Good use is made of visualisers to give instant feedback on pupils’ work.  Assessment is good. Teachers track pupils’ progress against the learning objectives and use their assessments to support future

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

planning. Pupils are encouraged to self-evaluate against the objectives of the lesson. However, not all pupils are aware of their individual ICT targets for their next stage of learning.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the ICT curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The programmes of study are being taught well and there are good links between other subjects. The link between ICT and literacy is very good. However, the school recognises the need to continue to adapt and monitor planning to support the Primary Strategy for literacy and numeracy.  Provision for pupils with learning difficulties is good and they make good progress in ICT.  The subject is well resourced. Resources have improved since the Section 5 inspection of 2005. However, there is a limited supply of digital cameras and video equipment to further support the creative element of the ICT curriculum.  High quality displays in the school celebrate pupils’ achievement in ICT through a wide range of subjects.

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

Leadership and management of ICT are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of ICT

 The ICT co-ordinator has made a significant impact on the development of the subject since the inspection of 2005. Regular staff meetings contain an ICT element for trialling and/or evaluating hardware and software.  Performance management is being used well to set ICT targets for teachers and support staff, in order to improve their skills and knowledge and to maintain the high profile of ICT.  A part time technician gives good support for the subject on a weekly basis.  Governors are well informed and support the subject very well.  The policy for safe use of the internet is known by parents, carers and pupils.

p.3

Subject issue - the impact of ICT on whole-school improvement

The impact of ICT on whole school improvement is good.

p.3

Subject issue - the impact of ICT on whole-school improvement

 Audits of teachers’ ICT skills and knowledge, through performance management, is used to identify individual training needs. This has had a good impact on teaching and learning and standards achieved.  Opportunities for teachers and teaching assistants to develop their ICT skills though school and local authority training are given a high priority.  The use of ICT to raise standards in other subjects is good. A particular strength is the impact on English and boys’ writing.  The school improvement plan, and subject co-ordinators’ action plans, contain good reference to ICT.

p.3

Inclusion

 Planning for different groups of pupils is good.  Very good use is made of ICT to support pupils with learning difficulties and so they make good progress in a range of subjects.  Provision for gifted and talented pupils is good and is given further support from the local technology school.  Pupils support each another very well in lessons, especially when they are in difficulties.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included to:

 continue to monitor and evaluate the impact of ICT across the curriculum and, especially, to support the Primary Strategy for literacy and numeracy  ensure pupils know their individual targets for improving their ICT skills and knowledge  ensure that when pupils are in large groups, they share the keyboard and mouse so as to be able to consolidate and develop their skills.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included to:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included to:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion