Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Oct 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ruth James

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth James

  • Postcode verified

    PR2 8RA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenthigh expectationsvery wellvery highmake good progresswell plannedimproving
Criticismnot alwayslimitedlownot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings562w+70
  • Leadership206w+54
  • What needs to improve96w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
825
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Hugill Headteacher Archbishop Temple C of E High School and Technology College St Vincent’s Road Fulwood Preston Lancashire PR2 8RA

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 20 - 21 September to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of science, the visit had a particular focus on transition within and between phases (KS2-KS3- KS4-post16); and the range of learning experiences and status of SC1.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, students’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The vast majority of students achieve at least grade C in GCSE sciences or equivalent qualifications. In 2007, of those entered for the different qualifications, 97% gained grades A*-C in biology, chemistry and physics; 85% achieved A*-C in double award science and 87% passed the BTEC first diploma in science.  In Key Stage 3 national tests the proportions of students achieving at least level 6 are very high. For example, in 2007 over 80% achieved this.  Contextual value added measures, which take account of students’ prior attainment and circumstances, show that students consistently make good progress in science during Key Stage 3.  Behaviour is very good.  Attendance is very good.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers are knowledgeable, committed and enthusiastic.  Very good use is made of practical and experimental work.  Lessons are well planned and structured and a good pace is maintained.  Students are attentive, engaged and keen to do well.  Teachers have high expectations of all students, including the less able.  Some good use is made of questions and answers to check prior knowledge and understanding.  Teachers are quick to respond on the rare occasions when students’ attention wanders. They are also astute at recognising students’ misconceptions or misunderstandings, and they ensure that these are resolved.  There is an appropriate emphasis on examination requirements, and particularly good reinforcement of key points.  Effective use is made of individual targets. Pupils know the levels or grades they are aiming for, and what they need to do to achieve these.  Several teachers have relevant industrial experience which is valuable for

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

teaching on the vocational BTEC first diploma course.  Although electronic whiteboards were seen in use in some lessons, there is limited use of information and communications technology (ICT) in teaching and learning overall. In some of the laboratories the length of the room made it difficult to see the whiteboard clearly from the back.  Marking of students’ work varies in quality, and comments are not always clearly focused on improving learning in science.  No unsatisfactory teaching was observed.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The curriculum in science is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 There is an excellent range of courses at Key Stage 4, including the triple science GCSE option (biology, chemistry and physics), core and additional science GCSEs, and the BTEC first diploma in science. These meet the needs of a very wide range of students.  There are some very good enrichment opportunities. For example, a project last year included a link with the National Space Centre and video conferencing.  Additional courses have been offered to gifted and talented students, such as GCSE astronomy, although low take up prevented the course running this year.  At present there are few industrial links for the BTEC course, but there are plans to rectify this.

p.2

Leadership and management

 There is very good teamwork.  Some good use is made of available data. For example, an analysis of the marks awarded for different Key Stage 3 national test questions has been used to consider teaching approaches to different topics.  Appropriate intervention strategies are planned for under-achievers.  There is a very positive approach to curriculum development.  Development planning is appropriately focused on raising attainment further, for example increasing the proportion of A and A* grades at GCSE.

p.3

Subject issues

Provision for scientific enquiry and for transition between stages is good.

p.3

Subject issues

 There is much practical and experimental work in lessons.  There are well established links with feeder primary schools. Science teachers are involved in the general transition arrangements.  The Year 6 transition day focus on ‘Fit and healthy’ included an element of science.  After the national tests in Year 9 good use is made of teaching time to ensure that students are well prepared for Key Stage 4 work.  The triple science GCSE option (biology, chemistry and physics) offers good preparation for those who might wish to study A level sciences.  The BTEC first diploma offers the possibility of progression to an advanced level vocational science course post 16.

p.3

Inclusion

 In lessons there is appropriate teaching assistant support for individuals with additional needs.  There are very good opportunities for less able students to achieve very well in science through the provision of the BTEC first diploma.  There are intervention strategies in place to support underachieving students.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 improving the quality of the laboratory accommodation  developing further the use of ICT in teaching and learning  improving marking to ensure consistency of practice, and a focus on helping students to improve their work and learning in science. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion