Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Oct 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Green

  • Postcode verified

    RH12 1RR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingvery wellpositivemake good progressenjoystrengthimproved
Criticismweaknessesseriouslynot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings757w+70
  • Leadership151w+47
  • What needs to improve174w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,048
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Cox Headteacher St. John’s Catholic Primary School Blackbridge Lane Horsham West Sussex RH12 1RR

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 October 2007 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of ICT, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of ICT on whole-school improvement.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with you, your subject manager, Year 2 and Year 6 pupils, your ‘Little Technicians’, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of Year 2 and Year 6 lessons in the computer suite.

p.1

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards and achievement in ICT are good. The contribution to pupils’ personal development and well-being is outstanding

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils enter school with standards in line with expectations. By Year 6, standards are above expectations. Pupils’ achievement is good. The Section 5 inspection of 2006 noted a “legacy of underachievement” in ICT. This has been addressed well.  Throughout the school, pupils have good basic skills. They use ICT with confidence.  Pupils enjoy using computers, interactive whiteboards, digital cameras and digital video recorders. They are not afraid to experiment should things go wrong and they support each other well to overcome problems.  A real strength of pupils’ personal development are the ‘Little technicians’, a group of gifted and talented pupils from Years 4 to Years 6 who support pupils, teachers, teaching assistants and supply teachers in ICT. They are conscientious and take their responsibilities very seriously.  Pupils have an excellent understanding of the need to work safely and appropriately when using the internet.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 ICT has a good impact on raising standards in other subjects. Good examples were observed of ICT supporting English, mathematics, science, art and religious education.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 The May 2006 inspection judged the teaching of ICT to be unsatisfactory. This has improved significantly.  Teaching of ICT is good, which results in good achievement.  Pupils are very well managed and consequently work very well together, in a calm and purposeful atmosphere.  The subject knowledge of teachers and support staff is good.  Very good use is made of interactive whiteboards to add impact and interest to lessons. Pupils confidently use the interactive whiteboard.  Assessment is satisfactory. Teachers are tracking pupils’ progress and are beginning to set targets. However, not all pupils are aware of their targets or their next steps for improvement. The school recognises that this is an area for development.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the ICT curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The programmes of study are being taught well and there are good links between subjects through the developing ‘creative curriculum’.  Provision for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is good and so they make good progress in ICT.  The use of gifted and talented pupils in Years 4 to Years 6 as ‘Little technicians’ is excellent as it enables them to further develop their ICT capability.  The subject is well resourced. All classes have interactive whiteboards a digital camera and access to laptop computers. The computer suite is well equipped and spacious. It is used for group and whole class lessons and is ensuring good progression in pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding.  Digital recorders are used well to support a number of subjects and make positive contribution to the development of pupils’ speaking, listening and creative skills.

p.2

Leadership and management of the subject

Leadership and management of ICT are good

p.3

Leadership and management of the subject

 Leadership and management of ICT are good and this has resulted in a rapid improvement in ICT provision and standards achieved.  The ICT leader has made a significant impact and has moved the subject forward at a fast pace.  A part time technician gives excellent technical and training support for the subject.  Governors are well informed and support the subject well.  There is a good action plan, with clear and measurable success criteria.  A portfolio of work is being developed, with examples from every lesson or topic taught in each year group. This is providing helpful information on the strengths and weaknesses in the ICT curriculum, and will be a helpful moderation tool.  The policy for safe use of the internet is known by parents and pupils, who are also required to sign an internet use agreement.

p.3

Subject issue - the impact of ICT on whole-school improvement

The impact of ICT on whole school improvement is good.

p.3

Subject issue - the impact of ICT on whole-school improvement

 The development of the ICT skills of staff has been given a high priority and is having a positive impact on the quality of teaching and learning.  The policy of replacing a variety of interactive whiteboards with a standard system in each class enables teachers and pupils to share ideas and resources and contributes well to pupils’ progress.

p.3

Inclusion

 Good use is made of ICT to support pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities.  Provision for gifted and talented pupils is outstanding.  Pupils support each another well in lessons.  Planning for different groups of pupils is good. However, able pupils are not always challenged as well as those who are identified as gifted and talented.  Assessment data is at an early stage but good systems are now in place to support tracking and planning for individual needs. However, not all pupils have a clear understanding of their targets for improvement.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included to:

 use assessment to track pupils’ progress, to support planning for individual needs and to make pupils aware of their targets for improvement  develop planned opportunities to challenge pupils who are able though not identified as gifted and talented  continue to embed ICT into the creative curriculum. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included to:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion