Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Jan 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kekshan Salaria

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kekshan Salaria

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseenjoymenthigh qualitymake good progressvery welloutstandingsupportiveengaginggood progress
Criticismnot alwayslimitedvariablebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings570w+82
  • Leadership184w+69
  • What needs to improve80w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
815
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Mr Michael Kent Headteacher Comber Grove School Comber Grove London SE5 OLQ

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit with Deana Holdaway ADM on 4 December 2007 to look at work in the Primary National Strategy (PNS).

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the PNS, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of assessment for learning (AfL).

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, enjoyment of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons. Limited use has been made of PNS because senior leaders have devised their own systems for targeting underperformance which serves the needs of pupils well. There is some involvement of the PNS through subject leaders’ meetings and other relevant training, for example, on implementing the revised literacy and numeracy frameworks.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Pupils’ achievement is good. The impact of the school’s systems for AfL on pupil’s achievement and personal development is also good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The majority of pupils arrive at the school with skills well below those expected for their age. By the end of Key Stage 2 pupils achieve standards Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquires@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk in line with the national average in mathematics. This represents good progress, including for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities.  Pupils behave well and enjoy their mathematics. There are keen to learn and respond very well to support and praise.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning in mathematics is good. The impact of the school’s system for AfL on teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 In lessons, good and some outstanding aspects of teaching were observed.  Effective oral work develops pupils’ mental strategies and extends their subject vocabulary. T eachers’ clear explanations develop pupils’ reasoning and ability to solve problems. Their open–ended questions enable pupils to explain and expand their thinking.  The school balances a clear focus on improving standards in English and mathematics with the determination to develop high quality teaching and learning across all subjects.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good. The impact of the school’s systems for AfL on the curriculum is also good.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The school's curriculum is broad and varied: pupils have many opportunities to experience a wide range of enrichment activities.Teachers’ lesson plans ensure appropriate breadth: all aspects of mathematics are covered and pupils are assessed in each aspect using units from the revised PNS frameworks.  Practical tasks, games and investigative inquiry underpin pupils understanding and enjoyment of mathematics.  Resources are well organised but staff are unaware of the many supportive external materials available.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management of mathematics are good. The effectiveness of leadership and management of PNS is also good.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Your leadership underpins the positive ethos and direction of the school. Senior leaders are innovative and creative and there is a strong commitment to inclusion. The school has a core of very experienced staff who have received high quality training. Strategic leadership has ensured that this training is disseminated well to support other colleagues in the school.  The senior leadership team drive improvements in mathematics by conducting thorough audits of pupils’ and teachers’ needs, monitoring pupils’ progress, sampling pupils’ workbooks and evaluating training.  Teaching assistants were observed to support pupils very effectively; however, senior leaders acknowledge this practice is variable.

p.2

Assessment for learning

The impact of the school’s systems for AfL overall is good.

p.3

Assessment for learning

 Senior leaders are committed to regular, accurate assessments which drive daily plans and meet pupils’ needs well.  There are diverse, appropriate and engaging methods for setting targets which impact positively on pupils’ progress.  Marking is supportive and regular but does not always identify the pupils’ next steps in learning.

p.3

Inclusion

The impact of the school’s systems for AfL on inclusion is good.

p.3

Inclusion

 Regular assessment of pupils informs differentiated activities and tasks.  Intervention strategies are modified to cater for the needs of individuals and this enables them to make good progress.  Pupils not working at national curriculum levels make good progress because their work is planned and assessed using the P-scales.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring marking identifies the next steps in learning for pupils  engaging teaching assistants fully in supporting pupils’ enjoyment and learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics and assessment for learning in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion