Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Oct 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kekshan Salaria

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kekshan Salaria

  • Postcode verified

    OX18 3SF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressrigorouseffectivelyhigh qualityvery effectivepositiveoutstandinggood progress
Criticismat riskmissedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings587w+76
  • Leadership192w+75
  • What needs to improve88w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
842
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Mrs Gay Hennessy Headteacher Gateway Primary School Netheravon Close Carterton Oxfordshire OX18 3SF

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 27 September 2007 to look at work in the Primary National Strategy (PNS).

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the PNS, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of Assessment for learning (AfL).

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons and other activities.

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The overall effectiveness of the PNS was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Pupils’ achievement in mathematics is good. The impact of AfL on pupils’ achievement and personal development is also good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 The majority of pupils arrive at the school with standards broadly in line with those expected for their age. They make good progress but a high level of pupil mobility affects the end-of-key stage test results. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquires@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk  Target setting and rigorous monitoring of pupils’ progress ensures their good progress.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning are very good.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning in mathematics is good. The impact of AfL on teaching and learning is also good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 There is a strong culture of collaborative learning. Good opportunities for partner talk help pupils to develop their mathematical ideas and understanding.  Teachers know their pupils well and plan effectively to meet their needs.  Effective questioning encourages pupils to explain their thinking.  Success criteria help pupils to evaluate and discuss their own learning.  Practical tasks and high quality resources engage the pupils’ interest.  Opportunities to make mathematics relevant and meaningful to pupils’ lives are sometimes missed.  Teaching assistants provide high quality support. They keep pupils focussed, support them through good questioning and provide feedback to class teachers on how individuals have progressed in the lesson.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good. The impact of AfL on the curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 Pupils enjoy mathematics, in particular, the games, practical activities and well planned investigations which challenge their thinking and understanding of mathematics.  The progress of all groups is carefully monitored. Teaching assistants’ support is programmed carefully and used effectively to overcome barriers to learning.  The school has recently introduced personalised learning for mathematics. Pupils are set according to their ability; they have the opportunity to work at their national curriculum level regardless of age. Informal evaluation by the senior team indicates this is already having a positive effect.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management in mathematics are good. The effectiveness of leadership and management of AfL is good.

p.2

Leadership and management

 AfL is central to all improvement plans. Aspects of the strategies have been chosen to support the strategic vision of senior leaders. For example, the focus on how pupils learn and their understanding of success criteria. Rigorous monitoring and evaluation ensures AfL policy is beginning to be implemented consistently across the school.  The school’s self evaluation procedures are very good. Regular lesson observations provide useful feedback for teachers. As a result, teaching has improved.  Much work has been undertaken on securing better progression for every pupil. For example, pupils’ needs are carefully assessed by the class teacher with the involvement of the Special Educational Needs Co-ordinator (SENCO) and Gifted and Talented Co-ordinator.

p.2

Assessment for learning

 AFL is a key feature of the school’s successful drive to raise standards.  Information gained from rigorous analysis of pupils’ assessments informs teachers’ lesson plans.  All school staff are inducted and trained effectively to promote a common approach to AfL.  The use of individual targets to help pupils understand how to improve their work is underdeveloped.

p.3

Inclusion

The impact of AfL on inclusion is outstanding.

p.3

Inclusion

 Inclusion is very good because all pupils make good progress and careful monitoring ensures that very effective support is provided for pupils at risk of underachieving.  Teaching assistants support pupils with individual educational plans by ensuring that gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding are quickly and systematically addressed.  Termly reviews of individual educational plans for pupils on the SEN register are carried out with parents and pupils. Data show that this work is having a positive impact.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring that pupils have individual targets for mathematics and use them to improve their work  developing opportunities to make mathematics relate to real life situations and pupils’ interests.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics and assessment for learning in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion