Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Jan 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Toft

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Toft

  • Postcode verified

    CW10 9NG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingvery wellvery effectiveenjoystrongrigorouseffective
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings499w+92
  • Leadership107w+47
  • What needs to improve61w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
641
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Mrs J Dunseath Headteacher Byley Primary School Moss Lane Byley Middlewich Cheshire CW10 9NG

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 4 December 2007 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of one lesson.

p.1

Design and Technology

Provision for D&T is good overall, with some outstanding features.

p.1

Achievements and Standards

The standard of D&T capability is above average overall and in resistant materials, and systems and control, in Key Stage 2, it is outstanding.

p.1

Achievements and Standards

 By the end of Year 6, pupils develop very good understanding of gears, mechanisms, control and electrics. They apply this understanding diligently as they design and make excellent functioning models of vehicles and fairground rides.  They are able to put this technologically rigorous learning into a wider perspective as they study examples of adult technology such as the Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk transmissions systems of the restored tractors kept at the local farm which the pupils visit.  Pupils design thoughtfully and to a high standard throughout the school and are given plenty of scope to think innovatively. Their evaluation of their own work and products is good.  Progress is good throughout the school.  Attainment, though good overall, is higher in resistant materials and systems and control than in food technology and textiles, especially in Key

p.1

Achievements and Standards

Stage 2. This is because the former areas of D&T are more fully covered than the latter.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

Teaching and learning are good throughout the school and outstanding in the more technological aspects of D&T with older pupils.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 The teachers have developed good levels of subject expertise for the units of work which they teach. The coordinator’s strong technical background has been of considerable assistance in this staff development.  Staff have good relationships with the pupils, who are very well behaved and hardworking. As a result, the staff are able to give pupils ample scope to develop their own, individualised design ideas. This promotes the pupils’ creativity.  Planning is good. The units of work selected from the national scheme produced by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority are well taught and resourced. Staff are very effective in showing pupils links between these units and other subjects.  The pupils’ response to the teaching of D&T is excellent. They work hard and enjoy the creative, technological and practical elements of the subject.  Pupils’ work is regularly assessed and the schools’ effective records show

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

how they make progress from the youngest class to Year 6.  The accommodation limits the provision of a specialist area for the hygienic teaching of food technology.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 D&T has a firm place within the school’s broad and balanced curriculum. Adequate time is devoted overall to its teaching.  Pupils rate the provision for D&T highly. They enjoy design and making functioning products and believe that the subject teaches qualities of use in later life such as technical skills and perseverance.  The coverage of more “hi-tech” aspects of D&T, especially in Key Stage 2, is excellent. Provision for food technology and textiles is less extensive.

p.2

Quality of leadership and management

 You ensure that D&T, together with other foundation subjects, is effectively included in the curriculum and properly staffed and resourced.  Though part-time and responsible for two other subjects, the D&T coordinator manages the subject well and has a clear view of how its practical and technological nature can be emphasised in the planning and teaching.  The school’s understanding of the quality and impact of its provision for D&T is accurate.  Resources are adequate for most aspects of D&T. They are well managed and deployed in the teaching.  Resources for food technology are very limited.  Pupils are very well managed in classrooms.

p.3

Inclusion

D&T is taught in a highly inclusive way and all pupils are given ample opportunity to make progress.

p.3

An area for improvement, which we discussed, was:

 investigate and implement cost-effective ways of improving provision for food technology and textiles.

p.3

An area for improvement, which we discussed, was:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

An area for improvement, which we discussed, was:

A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion