Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Matthew's Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Sept 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Ian Nelson
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
LU2 0NJ
- Name on report verified
St Matthew's Primary School
- URN verified
109552
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentSatisfactory
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007 p.9
- When children start school in Reception their skills and knowledge are exceptionally low when compared with those expected nationally of children of this age. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In some lessons teachers have to work very hard to control low-level disruption, such as children talking out of turn and being inattentive, so that others are disturbed and the pace of learning is slow. p.4
- There are pockets of better achievement, for example in reading groups that get extra support and in some classes, but there are also classes in which achievement is not good enough. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. p.5
- Standards throughout the school are exceptionally low, indicating no more than satisfactory progress for most children. p.5
- The school has identified achievement in writing as inadequate because too many children lack a secure grasp of language, vocabulary and sentence structures. p.5
- Few children gain the higher levels in the Year 2 or Year 6 national tests; the proportion gaining the expected levels is well below average. p.5
- The school has identified that boys do not achieve as well as girls and has introduced strategies to motivate them more in lessons, although these are too new to have had a significant impact yet. p.5
- Children who find learning hard make satisfactory progress because of the extra help they get. p.5
- The school exceeded its targets for Year 6 in English and met them in mathematics in 2007 but these were set a long way below the national average. p.5
- The 2008 targets are much more challenging. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,675
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Matthew's Primary School Inspection report
p.1
109552 Unique Reference Number LUTON LA Local Authority 319433 Inspection number 27 °28 September 2007 Inspection dates Ian Nelson Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 513 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr John McGrath Chair Mrs Debra Cannings Headteacher Not previously inspected Date of previous school inspection Wenlock Road School address Luton LU2 0NJ 01582723970 Telephone number 01582451961 Fax number
p.1
4-11 Age group 27 °28 September 2007 Inspection dates 319433 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a large primary school resulting from the amalgamation of the former infant and junior schools on this site. It opened in September 2006. It serves a culturally diverse population near the centre of Luton. Many children speak English as an additional language and the proportion at the early stages of learning English is well above average. A high proportion of children qualify for a free school meal. The number of children who join or leave the school part way through a school year is well above average, as is the number from refugee or asylum seeker families. An above average proportion of children need extra help with their learning. The school has gained Investors in People status. When children start school in Reception their skills and knowledge are exceptionally low when compared with those expected nationally of children of this age.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007
p.3
Grade: 3
Much has been accomplished during the transition from two schools to a single primary. The headteacher and governors have dealt with some difficult staffing issues, overseen an extensive refurbishment programme, appointed several new teachers, established a new senior leadership team and updated the policies and procedures from the former schools to match the ethos of the new one. Along with the leadership team they have gained a satisfactory view of the school's strengths and weaknesses and put in place systems to check how well individuals are doing with their learning and how good teaching and learning are. The progress of individual children and year groups is tracked regularly but the school does not analyse test and assessment results by ethnicity to identify potential underachievement by groups from different backgrounds. Leadership and management are satisfactory overall. The school's overall effectiveness and the value for money it gives are satisfactory. They are
p.4
Grade: 3
not better because all of this hard work has not yet raised standards throughout the school from an exceptionally low level. Senior leaders and governors base their evaluation of the school's performance on the systems and structures they have put in place rather than on their impact on teaching and children's learning. Achievement is satisfactory but there is significant underachievement in writing. There are pockets of better achievement, for example in reading groups that get extra support and in some classes, but there are also classes in which achievement is not good enough. The reason for this is that the quality of teaching ranges from outstanding to inadequate and is satisfactory, but not better, overall. In some lessons teachers have to work very hard to control low-level disruption, such as children talking out of turn and being inattentive, so that others are disturbed and the pace of learning is slow. Too
p.4
Grade: 3
few lessons are good enough to raise standards to acceptable levels and prepare children for the next phase of their education and later life. While the school provides a satisfactory range of activities to help children to learn these sometimes lack sparkle and do not fully engage all children. In the Foundation Stage, the provision is also satisfactory. Care, guidance and support are satisfactory. Staff work hard to care for the children's individual needs and to promote an awareness and appreciation of the range of cultures in the neighbourhood. One parent commented quite rightly, 'The school is welcoming and friendly and is doing a good job to support the needs of a very diverse community'. The result is a happy and harmonious school where children's personal development is satisfactory. They enjoy being school councillors and having jobs around the school. Behaviour is satisfactory. Most parents
p.4
Grade: 3
are pleased with the school but a few expressed concerns about a variety of aspects, although the inspectors found no evidence to support their criticisms.
p.4
Grade: 3
In the Foundation Stage, children show respect for one another, for instance taking turns and sharing equipment, because of the strong focus on their personal, social and emotional development. Progress in the Foundation Stage is satisfactory, but when children enter Year 1 standards are still very low. Staff plan a satisfactory range of activities including regular access to a well equipped outdoor area as well as the opportunity to use information and communication technology (ICT), particularly the interactive white board. Support staff are well trained and provide good support for individuals or small groups. Planning reflects the need for a balance 4 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007 of child-initiated and adult-focussed activities but it does not sufficiently reflect the needs of individual children.
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
■ Check rigorously and regularly that management systems and structures are helping all children to learn more effectively and raising standards throughout the school. ■ Extend children's knowledge and use of language, vocabulary and sentence structure to raise their achievement in writing. ■ Eradicate the small amount of unsatisfactory teaching and where it is satisfactory improve classroom management and the pace of lessons to accelerate children's learning. ■ Analyse test and assessment results by ethnicity to identify and address any potential underachievement by groups of children. A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
Grade: 3
Standards throughout the school are exceptionally low, indicating no more than satisfactory progress for most children. The school has identified achievement in writing as inadequate because too many children lack a secure grasp of language, vocabulary and sentence structures. Few children gain the higher levels in the Year 2 or Year 6 national tests; the proportion gaining the expected levels is well below average. The school has identified that boys do not achieve as well as girls and has introduced strategies to motivate them more in lessons, although these are too new to have had a significant impact yet. Children who find learning hard make satisfactory progress because of the extra help they get. The school exceeded its targets for Year 6 in English and met them in mathematics in 2007 but these were set a long way below the national average. The 2008 targets are much more challenging.
p.5
Grade: 3
Children's spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Children understand the need to stay healthy and appreciate the opportunities they have for sport and physical exercise, both in lessons and after school. Despite this understanding, children say they do not always make healthy choices when choosing snacks. They know that they need to keep themselves safe, and they have confidence that the school staff will deal with any problems should they arise. The school has a well developed system for dealing with the rare incidents of bullying, which is understood by all children. They treat one another with respect and their behaviour in the playground is good, but some children find it difficult to maintain their concentration and good behaviour during lessons. This adversely affects their learning and that of others. The school council enjoys increasing responsibilities, including choosing the colour schemes
p.5
Grade: 3
for the refurbished toilets. Older children take responsibility in the wider running of the school, for instance acting as buddies to children who are new to the school. Opportunities to contribute to the wider community are limited and staff recognise the need to develop more ways for children to gain personal responsibility. 5 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007
p.5
Grade: 3
Teaching is satisfactory, though it varies from outstanding to inadequate. Where teaching is good or outstanding the lessons are interesting and exciting. When this happens children behave well and make good progress. These lessons are characterised by good relationships in class and excellent questioning of children. In the small number of inadequate lessons, some children do not concentrate on their work. This slows the pace of learning and is having an impact on standards and achievement. In the majority of lessons, effective use of well trained teaching assistants means that children are supported satisfactorily. Whilst there is evidence of good marking it is not consistent in all classes and children do not always feel the advice they are given is helpful.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school provides a satisfactory range of activities to help children to learn. Each year group has an effective plan which identifies the learning activities that take place and the links between different subject areas. However, not all planned activities fully engage all children. This is particularly true of boys. Good use is made of visitors to the school who support children's understanding of the wider community. In addition, children enjoy a range of visits that make learning more interesting. There are many sporting clubs available for children after school but none for those interested in extending their learning in other areas such as the arts or music. Staff promote racial harmony through work in lessons, visitors to school and trips to places such as St Matthew's Church and Luton Central Mosque effectively.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school places a great deal of emphasis on pastoral care, with the appointment of family workers and learning mentors who provide effective support for children and their families. Staff help new children to settle quickly and arrangements for children moving into the school are good. The school has in place all the required procedures to safeguard children. The school uses test and assessment information to identify children who would benefit from additional support to meet any special learning needs. The school does not analyse test and assessment results to identify potential underachievement of ethnic groups. Most children understand their targets and National Curriculum levels in English, mathematics and science.
p.6
Grade: 3
While the headteacher and governors have achieved a lot in the short time the school has been open, their initiatives have not yet raised standards and improved achievement. The school has introduced systems for checking how well children are progressing and how good teaching is, but senior leaders are not evaluating the impact of new developments on children's learning and progress. The senior leadership team is relatively new and, while teachers are fully committed 6 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007 to school improvement, several have not been in post long enough to have had a significant impact on raising standards in their subjects. The school has satisfactory capacity to improve. The governors are very supportive and have worked hard to update all the former schools' policies and procedures and support the headteacher with the building refurbishments. They
p.6
Grade: 3
have a satisfactory understanding of how well the school is doing but recognise the need for newer governors to gain experience and confidence in holding staff to account for the school's performance. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007 .
p.7
Grade: 3
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? NA Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 4 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 3 The behaviour of learners 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
29 September 2007 Dear Children Inspection of St Matthew's Primary School, Luton, LU2 0NJ Thank you for making us so welcome when we came to inspect your school recently. This letter is the one I promised your school council to tell you what we found out about your school. You told us that most children behave well and we agree with you, even though some of you do not pay enough attention in class so that you disturb your own learning and that of others. We have asked your teachers to make sure you all work hard and pay full attention in lessons. A lot of you struggle with your writing and we have asked your teachers to help you to get better with this. Although you make satisfactory progress in your learning, the standards you reach are not high enough. This is because some lessons do not help you to learn enough, while others help you a lot. We have asked the teachers to make sure you learn well in all of them.
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Your headteacher and the staff have done a lot of work in overseeing the new building work and recruiting new teachers and we have asked them to check that all the work they do is helping you to learn better. Teachers keep a record of how well each of you is learning and know that girls are doing better than boys. We have asked them to track how well groups of children from different backgrounds are learning too so that they can make sure you all do well enough. We thought you all got on well with each other and were very pleased to meet you and talk with you about your school. We wish you well for the future. Ian Nelson Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: St Matthew's Primary School, 27 °28 September 2007
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion