Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Nov 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    B71 1RP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentpositiveeffectivestrengthsrichindependentthoughtfulkeen
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesinsufficientlimitednot effectivenot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings517w+14
  • Leadership167w+33
  • What needs to improve87w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
759
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Willetts Headteacher St Mary Magdalene Junior and Infant School Stanway Road West Bromwich B71 1RP

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit with Anne Pitt HMI on 24 September 2007 to look at work in religious education (RE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of RE the visit had a particular focus on the subject’s contribution to the promotion of community cohesion.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with governors, staff and pupils, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The overall effectiveness of RE was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Pupils’ achievement in RE is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils are generally working at the expected levels as outlined in the Sandwell agreed syllabus. Work seen in books shows that pupils have many opportunities to consider beliefs, practices, ways of life and sense of belonging in the religions studied. They have less opportunity for examining matters relating to meaning and purpose.  Pupils show very positive attitudes to the subject. They find RE interesting and say that it helps them to understand how other people live and what they believe. This enables them to show respect for other people’s beliefs. The contribution of RE to supporting to pupils’ personal development is excellent.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in RE is satisfactory with good features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teaching is usually well informed and activities are generally well conceived. Pupils participate and behave well in lessons because of the good relationships they have with their teachers. Pupils value the many opportunities to express their opinions and know that their teachers and fellow pupils listen to and respect their views. Effective use is made of learning support assistants. Teaching strategies do not always ensure that pupils consolidate their learning before moving on as there is sometimes a tendency to try to cover too much in lessons.  Pupils are encouraged to express their responses, thoughts and feelings through free writing especially in Key Stage 2. There is scope to develop more opportunities to build independent writing into Key Stage 1 where work is mainly worksheet based.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The curriculum is thoughtful. The choice of religions studied reflects the nature of the local community. There is a good balance of work between the two attainment targets with appropriate attention paid to the development of pupils’ knowledge and understanding of religion using a thematic approach. Pupils are encouraged to engage with RE and reflect on their own lives by examining religion and the individual, the family, community and the wider world. The thematic approach to RE adopted by the school does not always secure effective continuity in the pupils’ learning.  There is a limited range of activities to enrich the curriculum, insufficient use is made of fieldwork. However, the school has made effective links with personal, social and health education (PSHE) within school and utilised staff expertise well.  The arrangements for assessment in RE are satisfactory and developing. The recently introduced ‘I can’ statements are a positive

p.2

Quality of curriculum

step in enabling teachers to refine their planning in the light of on- going assessment.

p.2

Leadership and Management

The leadership and management of RE are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and Management

 The RE co-ordinator is keen and has good subject knowledge. A clear policy and a new scheme of work are in place. A start has been made on self evaluation, so that strengths and weaknesses have been clearly identified resulting in a subject action plan.  Monitoring arrangements are presently informal with some scrutiny of teachers’ planning. The teaching of RE is not systematically evaluated but elements have been looked at during the monitoring of other areas. There are plans to monitor the implementation of the newly introduced assessment arrangements.

p.2

Community Cohesion

RE lessons enable pupils to develop attitudes of tolerance and respect for those who see the world differently to themselves. There are fewer opportunities for pupils to conduct field work and experience the rich diversity of religion in the local area. This forms part of the school’s action plan and provides a good basis to formalise some of the good work that takes place in the PSHE curriculum.

p.3

Inclusion

All pupils are included in RE lessons; no pupils are withdrawn because lessons are structured so that all can participate no matter what their faith group. Pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities make similar progress to that of their peers. They receive good support from learning support assistants. All pupils are supported and encouraged to give their opinions and to value the beliefs and practices of others.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 completing the implementation of the assessment arrangements for RE  formalising the mechanisms for monitoring the effectiveness of the subject  extending the use made of field work in RE.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and SACRE and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion