Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

dip

Inspected 2 Apr 2008 · published 21 May 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Apr 2008

  • Name on report verified

    dip

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectiveexcellentvery wellstrengthsconsistentlysuccessfulvery high
Criticisminsufficientlyinsufficientat riskdisruptionnot sufficientlynot successfulbelowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings881w+67
  • What needs to improve1537w+45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
2,360
shorter than usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 36%What needs to improve 64%

Full report text

Contents

Background information ......................................................................................................... 3 Inspection judgements........................................................................................................... 3 Scope of the inspection.......................................................................................................... 3 Description of the provider...................................................................................................... 4 Summary of grades awarded .................................................................................................. 5 Overall judgement.................................................................................................................... 6 Effectiveness of provision ..................................................................................................... 6

p.2

Contents

Capacity to improve............................................................................................................ 6 Key strengths ............................................................................................................................ 6 Key areas for improvement..................................................................................................... 7 Main findings............................................................................................................................ 8 Achievement and standards................................................................................................... 8 Quality of provision............................................................................................................... 8 Leadership and management ................................................................................................. 9

p.2

Contents

Equality of opportunity....................................................................................................... 9 What learners like.................................................................................................................. 11 What learners think could improve...................................................................................... 11 Information and communication technology....................................................................... 11 Literacy and numeracy ........................................................................................................ 12 Learners’ achievements......................................................................................................... 13

p.2

Inspection judgements

Inspectors use a four-point scale to summarise their judgements about achievement and standards, the quality of provision, and leadership and management, which includes a grade for equality of opportunity .

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Grade 1 Outstanding Grade 2 Good Grade 3 Satisfactory Grade 4 Inadequate

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Further information can be found on how inspection judgements are made on www.ofsted.gov.uk.

p.3

Scope of the inspection

In deciding the scope of the inspection, inspectors take account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and comments from the local Learning and Skills Council (LSC) or other funding body. Where appropriate, inspectors also consider the previous inspection report ( www.ofsted.gov.uk ), reports from the inspectorates’ quality monitoring or annual assessment visits, and data on learners and their achievements over the period since the previous inspection.

p.3

Scope of the inspection

In addition to reporting on overall effectiveness of the organisation, its capacity to improve further, achievement and standards, quality of provision and leadership and management, this inspection focused on specialist provision in:

p.3

Scope of the inspection

 Information and communication technology  Literacy and numeracy  Description of the provider

p.3

Scope of the inspection

1. dip delivers learndirect courses in one centre through the West Yorkshire learndirect region. Located in Batley, West Yorkshire, dip has operated as a learndirect centre since March 2001. The centre opens flexibly in the evenings and on Saturdays. It provides programmes in literacy and numeracy, and information and communication technology (ICT) for users. Currently 431 learners are enrolled, of whom 8% are following literacy courses, 11% are enrolled on a range of literacy and numeracy courses and 81% are taking ICT courses. In addition one learner is following an English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) programme as part of a pilot project. dip is owned and managed by the chief executive who is also the only full-time tutor. A business adviser, who is not employed by dip, supports the chief executive in strategic business decisions. Two consultants deliver literacy, numeracy and ESOL support for two hours each week.

p.4

Scope of the inspection

2. The centre is located in the deprived ward of Batley East. Most learners are recruited from eight of the most deprived wards in West Yorkshire. Approximately 32% of learners are from a minority ethnic background.

p.4

Summary of grades awarded

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

p.5

Summary of grades awarded

Achievement and standards Outstanding: Grade 1

p.5

Summary of grades awarded

Equality of opportunity Contributory grade: Good: Grade 2

p.5

Sector subject areas

Information and communication technology Good: Grade 2

p.5

Good: Grade 2

3. The overall effectiveness of the provision is good. Achievements and standards are outstanding on skills for life and ICT courses. Learners are highly motivated and develop a good range of skills. The quality of provision is good. Teaching and learning are good. The extent to which dip meets the needs and interests of learners is satisfactory. Support for learners is particularly good. Leadership and management are good, with particularly effective management action to improve and maintain high success rates. Equality of opportunity is good as is provision in literacy and numeracy, and in ICT.

p.6

Good: Grade 2

4. dip has demonstrated that it has a good capacity to improve. Success rates are consistently high in skills for life and have shown significant improvement in ICT, with both being significantly better than regional and national rates. Withdrawal rates are below regional and national rates for learndirect programmes. dip has consistently achieved, and often exceeded, its funding body and recruitment targets. The organisation has shown consistent and sustained growth since contracting with Ufi. Quality assurance arrangements are informal, but are successful in bringing about improvements for learners.

p.6

Good: Grade 2

5. The self-assessment process is satisfactory. Staff and learners contribute to the judgements in the report. The self-assessment grades matched inspection grades with the exception of achievement and standards, where the inspection team awarded a higher grade. dip accurately identified many of its key strengths and areas for improvement. Some judgements in the report are repetitive and focus insufficiently on specific key questions. The action plan resulting from the self-assessment report is kept under constant review and many actions have been met according to deadline dates set.

p.6

Key strengths

 High success rates on all courses  Good development of learners knowledge and skills  Particularly good support for learners  Particularly effective management action to improve success rates  Good investment in resources  Good commitment to meeting learners’ additional learning needs

p.6

Key areas for improvement

 Insufficient planning and recording of learning

p.7

Outstanding: Grade 1

6. Achievement and standards are outstanding. Success rates are high in skills for life. In 2006/07, they were at 87% and at the end of quarter 2 in 2007/08 are at 88%. These success rates are significantly higher than the regional and national success rates. Similarly in ICT, success rates in quarter 2, of 2007/08 are high at 84%. This is a significant improvement compared with the previous year’s success rate of 43%. Pass rates in the European Computer Driving Licence (ECDL) qualification are very high at 89%. Withdrawal and timed-out rates are considerably lower than the regional and national averages in both areas of learning.

p.8

Outstanding: Grade 1

7. Learners develop a good range of knowledge and skills. ICT learners acquire a good range of skills, such as word-processing, emailing, spreadsheets and databases. Skills for life learners are particularly proud of the nationally recognised qualifications they obtain through learndirect , especially if they left school without formal qualifications. Learners receive good encouragement to reach as high a standard as possible in their in-course and external assessments. Learners are highly motivated and many take several learndirect courses. Learners’ confidence improves considerably as their computing skills develop and as their literacy and numeracy knowledge increases. One learner, who successfully studied 19 courses, achieved the Yorkshire and Humberside learndirect outstanding learner award and was a finalist at the national awards. Learners apply themselves very well to their study and make good progress.

p.8

Good: Grade 2

8. The quality of provision is good. Tutors are patient, approachable and particularly helpful in guiding individual learners when they require assistance with their learndirect courses. If learners are working at home and require help, tutors provide good email and telephone support which makes a significant contribution to their progress. A good range of learning materials, to supplement learndirect courses, are available and effectively used by learners who require additional practice. dip’s appointments system is effective and learners’ attendance is well monitored. Learners’ progress is regularly checked.

p.8

Good: Grade 2

9. Initial assessment is satisfactory. learndirect skills checks are satisfactorily used to assess learners’ literacy and numeracy skills. dip does not have a strategy to guide the delivery of the learndirect skills for life provision. ICT learners are satisfactorily assessed through oral questioning before being recommended to an ICT learndirect course. Induction arrangements are satisfactory and cover an appropriate range of topics. 10. Planning and recording of learning are insufficient. Individual learning plans do not set specific, measurable, time-related and achievable short-term goals to guide learners’ immediate learning. Insufficient attention is given to reviewing their in-session learning and to assess whether they have made sufficient progress and achieved what they intended. This area for improvement is acknowledged in the self-assessment report and action is being taken to resolve it.

p.8

Good: Grade 2

11. The range of learndirect courses available to learners is satisfactory. The provider has ambitious plans to move to larger premises within the next two months and to offer a much wider portfolio of courses, including ESOL, business and management courses and national vocational qualifications through the Train to Gain initiative.

p.9

Good: Grade 2

12. Learners receive particularly good support. They have access to impartial information, advice and guidance to assess the suitability of learndirect courses. Learners who have restricted incomes are very well supported through the offer of bus fare assistance which enables them to access their learndirect courses when otherwise they may not be able to do so. Learners can use the free-phone and call-back facilities which enable them to communicate with the centre at no cost to themselves.

p.9

Good: Grade 2

Equality of opportunity Contributory grade: Good: Grade 2

p.9

Good: Grade 2

13. Leadership and management are good. Management actions to maintain and improve success rates are particularly effective. dip has taken part in a Ufi pilot project to reduce withdrawals. Successful strategies include effective and regular communication with learners at every stage in their programme to encourage them to stay on programme. Learners identified at risk of not completing their programme are frequently contacted and given additional support to help keep them in learning. Unemployed learners are given financial support with travel arrangements to attend the centre. A free-phone number encourages learners to contact the centre regularly. Learners have satisfactory opportunities to give their opinions about the quality of their learndirect experiences through regular surveys. Responses indicate high levels of satisfaction with all aspects of the provision. dip celebrates learner success well by acknowledging each qualification

p.9

Good: Grade 2

success by letter. dip is collecting progression data to assess success in improving learners’ employability and career and training opportunities. Of the learners who have been supported to complete curriculum vitae, 50% have been successful in securing employment.

p.9

Good: Grade 2

14. The centre has invested in providing good quality resources for learners, a strength recognised in the self-assessment report. Learners benefit from a relaxed yet professional environment. Computer work areas are individually screened for privacy to prevent unnecessary disruption from other learners. Information technology equipment is of a good standard. The air conditioned and well maintained environment provides a comfortable and conducive learning environment. Staff are well qualified and experienced and hold or are working towards level 4 qualifications in literacy and numeracy.

p.9

Good: Grade 2

15. dip has developed effective links with a range of relevant local organisations who now refer potential learners to dip to improve their skills and employability. Most learners stay with dip and take a range of further qualifications.

p.9

Good: Grade 2

16. Strategic planning is satisfactory and provides a good focus on the projected growth of the business. The chief executive is the only full-time tutor and makes all business decisions through consultation with a business adviser. dip has steadily grown over six years while meeting and often exceeding funding body targets. New premises are in the final stages of purchase and directors plan to expand courses and staffing levels. These plans however, are not committed to paper. The self-assessment development plan is used to guide the business on an annual basis. Some targets in the plan are insufficiently precise. Management information is reviewed monthly to assess performance against targets. dip has a satisfactory range of key policies and procedures, including health and safety, complaints and equality of opportunities. However, some policies are not dated and others have not been reviewed since October 2006.

p.9

Good: Grade 2

17. dip’s approach to equality of opportunity is good. Learners work in a safe and professional environment. The procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements. Staff at the centre are undergoing checks with the Criminal Records Bureau. The centre does not currently have any learners who are classed as vulnerable adults. dip’s approach to meeting the requirements of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2002 is good. A wide range of equipment is provided for learners with physical and sensory impairment. Access is good and a recent wheelchair accessible washroom facility has been completed. Learners receive appropriate information on equality of opportunity at induction. Attractive posters in the centre promote equality and diversity. The centres fees policy and recruitment processes encourage inclusivity. dip is less successful at ongoing promotion of equality of

p.10

Good: Grade 2

opportunity to current learners. Staff receive regular training and updating on equality and diversity through Ufi network training events.

p.10

Good: Grade 2

18. dip’s approach to quality improvement is satisfactory. They have achieved the quality standard of Matrix accreditation and are working towards Customer First accreditation. Quality assurance arrangements are informal, but are effective in bringing about improvements. An observation of teaching and learning process is used and dip is further improving the process by linking with another organisation to gain a more independent approach. The self-assessment process is satisfactory. Staff and learners contribute to the judgements in the report. The self-assessment grades were mostly accurate. dip accurately identified some of its key strengths and areas for improvement, but did not sufficiently review and evaluate its approach to quality improvement or equality of opportunity in the report. Some judgements in the report are repetitive and focus insufficiently on specific key questions.

p.10

What learners like

 ‘The course has been a big help to me. A real confidence booster’  Convenient location and opening times  ‘The centre is excellent and the staff are very welcoming, helpful and courteous’  ‘Staff are at the end of the telephone to give help when I need it’  The well managed centre  The phone-back service  Good response to emails  ‘Learning here is an enjoyable experience’  ‘I like learndirect courses. They go step-by-step, are easy to work through and are very specific’  ‘The ECDL course is excellent. I did not know about computers before and started at the very beginning. Now I’m much more confident’

p.11

What learners think could improve

 ‘Computer booths are cramped if you need to do any writing’  Share results of ECDL course diagnostic assessments  ‘Open on Mondays’

p.11

Information and communication technology

 High success rates in Quarter 2 of 2007/08  Good development of knowledge and skills  Good facilitation of learning  Particularly good support for learners

p.12

Strengths

 Consistently high success rates in literacy and numeracy  Good development of knowledge and skills  Good facilitation of learning  Particularly good support for learners

p.12

Strengths

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.13

Learners’ achievements

Q2 2008 Enrolments Counted for data Success rate (%) Withdrawal rate (%) All sectors 1306 1214 86.8 0.7 ICT 514 428 84.3 1.2 skills for life 792 786 88.2 0.4

p.13

Equality and diversity

Q2 2008 All Ethnic Groups Asian or Asian British Black or Black British Chinese/Other Mixed Not Known White

p.13

Equality and diversity

Enrolments 1306 348 17 10 30 0 875 Completion rate (%) 99.3 99.1 100 83.3 95.8 0 99.6 Achievement rate (%) 90 89.6 75 100 82.6 0 90.3 Success rate (%) 86.8 84 75 83.3 79.2 0 88.1 Withdrawal rate (%) 0.7 0.9 0 16.7 4.2 0 0.4

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion