Other · Ofsted report
Huddersfield Technical College
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Name on report verified
Huddersfield Technical College
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Innovative projects to address issues such as sexual health and community empowerment are highly effective. p.6
- In these lessons, learners clearly enjoy their learning, are enthusiastic and keen to contribute their ideas. p.22
- The college offers an exceptionally diverse range of learning opportunities to people of all ages in a multicultural community. p.6
- Very effective links between the workplace and the college reinforce learning for apprentices. p.10
- Partnership arrangements are strong, a strength identified at the last inspection. p.12
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Provision in ICT has declined and is inadequate. 9. p.6
- Lesson plans and schemes of work fail to identify learning outcomes and teachers fail to check if learning has occurred. p.18
- However, many are not sufficiently rigorous with observers placing insufficient attention on whether students are learning and making progress. p.10
- The management of key skills is inconsistent, with insufficient improvement in the quality of provision and success rates in some areas. p.6
- However, the strategy is insufficiently led and managed and rates of improvement are inconsistent across the college. p.10
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The college’s capacity to improve is satisfactory. p.7
- The college is in a good financial position, adapting its provision well in response to funding priorities. p.7
- It has successfully maintained its strong commitment to inclusion and expanded employer engagement through its successful T2G provision. p.7
- Success and retention rates are improving, but not quickly enough at levels 1 and 3 to match national rates. p.7
- Quality improvement initiatives are inconsistently applied and have had insufficient impact on some curriculum areas. p.7
- Self-assessment is broadly satisfactory. p.7
- The college has a general understanding of its strengths and areas requiring improvement. p.7
- Some areas of the college were over generous when grading provision and the college did not include T2G or additional learning support in its self-assessment report. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development31
“Low retention rates were a weakness at the last inspection.” p.9
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 29
- Words of findings
- 7,604
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Audience Post-sixteen Published date May 2008 Provider reference 130537 Provider reference 130537
p.1
Published date May 2008 Huddersfield Technical College Inspection report
p.1
Contents
Key strengths and areas for improvement 8
p.2
Grading
Inspectors use a four-point scale to summarise their judgements about achievement and standards, the quality of provision, and leadership and management, which includes a grade for equality of opportunity.
p.3
Grading
The descriptors for the four grades are: • grade 1 – outstanding • grade 2 – good • grade 3 – satisfactory • grade 4 – inadequate
p.3
Grading
Further information can be found on how inspection judgements are made on www.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.3
Scope of the inspection
In deciding the scope of this inspection, inspectors took account of: the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans; comments from the local Learning and Skills Council (LSC) or other funding body; and where appropriate the previous inspection report ( www.ofsted.gov.uk ); reports from the inspectorate annual assessment visits or quality monitoring inspection; and data on learners and their achievement over the period since the last inspection. This inspection focused on the following aspects:
p.3
Scope of the inspection
overall effectiveness of the organisation and its capacity to improve further achievement and standards quality of provision leadership and management specialist provision in: engineering and manufacturing technologies; construction, planning and the built environment; information and communication technology (ICT); arts, media and publishing; languages, literature and culture; and preparation for life and work.
p.3
Description of the provider
1. Huddersfield Technical College is a large general further education college (GFE) with its main campus located in the centre of Huddersfield. Specialist accommodation for construction, engineering and animal care is housed in purpose built sites. The college provides adult and community learning in a number of sites across Kirklees. Although Kirklees has areas of affluence, nine local wards are in the 10% most deprived in England. The college recruits 47% of its 16-18-year-old learners from communities categorised as areas of depredation. Huddersfield is a multicultural borough and the college population reflects this with some 20% of learners from minority ethnic heritage groups. In 2007, 55.5% of Year 11 school leavers in Kirklees obtained five or more general certificate of education (GCSE) passes at grades A* to C, which is much lower than the national average of 62%.
p.4
Description of the provider
2. During 2006/07, the college had 28,460 enrolments. The majority of learners (79%) on full-time programmes are 16-18-years-old, with adults making up 73% of all part-time enrolments. The highest proportion of enrolments for long programmes, some 44% were at level 2, 29% at level 3 and 27% at level 1. A very small cohort of learners enrol onto higher level programmes. The college provides courses in all sector subject areas with most enrolments in the areas of preparation for life and work, retail and commercial enterprise, engineering technology and manufacture and health and public services. The college has Centre of Vocational Excellence status (CoVE) for computer-aided design and manufacture.
p.4
Description of the provider
3. The college is part of the 14-16 Kirklees Collegiate and together with some contracts with individual schools, provides programmes for approximately 720 Year 10 and 11 learners. At the time of inspection, 652 learners were following apprenticeship programmes in engineering, construction, retail and commercial enterprise, health, public services and care, and business administration. The college leads a consortium of approximately 16 providers. During 2006/07, the consortium enrolled 1,250 learners onto Entry to Employment (E2E) programmes, 60 of whom were following college courses. In addition, the college acts as lead partner in a large and diverse consortium of providers who provide Train to Gain (T2G) provision to 3,700 learners across the region. The college is currently awaiting approval to build a new college.
p.4
Leadership and management Satisfactory: Grade 3
Equality of opportunity Good: Contributory Grade 2
p.5
Effectiveness of provision Satisfactory: Grade 3
4. The effectiveness of provision is satisfactory. Learners’ achievement is satisfactory but retention rates have remained low over the last three years. Long programme success rates have improved, some at a faster rate than the national average. However, success rates at level 1 for all learners and at level 3 for learners aged 16-18 remain low. Work related skills are generally good apart from information and communication technology (ICT) where learners have insufficient work related experience. Key skills success rates are below the national average, particularly at level 2.
p.6
Effectiveness of provision Satisfactory: Grade 3
5. The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. This judgement disguises significant variations in the quality of teaching. In good lessons, learners are motivated and engaged, learning through imaginative and well conceived activities and assignments. However, in many lessons teachers are insufficiently focused on learning and its demonstrative outcomes. The college’s arrangements for quality assuring teaching and learning are not yet sufficiently effective. The management of key skills is inconsistent, with insufficient improvement in the quality of provision and success rates in some areas.
p.6
Effectiveness of provision Satisfactory: Grade 3
6. The college’s response to social inclusion is outstanding. The college offers an exceptionally diverse range of learning opportunities to people of all ages in a multicultural community. Through open and effective partnerships, it provides well targeted learning. Arrangements for meeting the needs of learners are good. Personal support for vulnerable learners is prompt. Innovative projects to address issues such as sexual health and community empowerment are highly effective. The energetic students’ union and a lively enrichment team organise a particularly inclusive set of cross college activities. Information, advice and guidance are satisfactory. Learners’ attitude and behaviour were identified as an area for improvement in the college self-assessment report and are now much improved.
p.6
Effectiveness of provision Satisfactory: Grade 3
7. Educational inclusion is satisfactory. Most learners on level 2 programmes are successful. Progression is good between levels. However, whilst personal and discrete support is good, there is little additional support for learners in classes. Tutorials and progress monitoring vary in quality with the setting of targets often poorly recorded. Some curriculum areas do not inform parents of their sons’ or daughters’ progress.
p.6
Effectiveness of provision Satisfactory: Grade 3
8. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Governors and managers have improved the inadequate provision from the last inspection, maintained strong partnerships and effectively managed the inception of the successful T2G consortium. The promotion of equality and diversity is good. However, managers have not succeeded in embedding a consistent approach to quality assurance across all areas. Provision in ICT has declined and is inadequate. 9. The college manages a very successful work-based learning and T2G provision. E2E progression rates are improving and satisfactory. Success rates are significantly improved and good on apprenticeships and T2G programmes. Learners demonstrate improved confidence, skill development and good health and safety practices. Effective links with the workplace reinforces learning. Support for individual learners is good as are partnership arrangements, supporting a wide range of provision and opportunities for
p.6
Effectiveness of provision Satisfactory: Grade 3
learners. Target setting on apprenticeship programmes is inconsistently rigorous and literacy and numeracy support is underdeveloped on T2G programmes. The successful management of T2G is making a significant contribution to the accreditation of workplace skills in the region. Effective quality assurance maintains improvements in apprenticeship programmes. However, the quality assurance arrangements of the T2G provision are underdeveloped.
p.7
Capacity to improve Satisfactory: Grade 3
10. The college’s capacity to improve is satisfactory. The college is in a good financial position, adapting its provision well in response to funding priorities. It has successfully maintained its strong commitment to inclusion and expanded employer engagement through its successful T2G provision. Success and retention rates are improving, but not quickly enough at levels 1 and 3 to match national rates. Quality improvement initiatives are inconsistently applied and have had insufficient impact on some curriculum areas. Self-assessment is broadly satisfactory. The college has a general understanding of its strengths and areas requiring improvement. Some areas of the college were over generous when grading provision and the college did not include T2G or additional learning support in its self-assessment report. Development plans often lack detail with insufficient focus on key areas for improvement. Targets are often not precise or sufficiently time
p.7
improvement since the last inspection
11. The college has made satisfactory progress since the last inspection with many key strengths maintained. It has improved provision in arts, media and publishing; engineering and manufacturing; and construction. The last inspection judged work-based learning provision in hairdressing and construction as unsatisfactory. These have significantly improved and are now good. Standards of provision have declined in ICT from satisfactory to inadequate. The inconsistent application of quality improvement initiatives, the management and success rates of key skills and retention rates, were issues identified at the last inspection and continue to be areas for improvement.
p.7
Key strengths
high apprenticeship, T2G and national vocational qualifications (NVQ) success rates good development of learners’ practical skills broad and responsive range of provision outstanding social inclusion good promotion of equality and diversity strong partnership working.
p.8
The college should address:
the inadequate provision in ICT low success rates at level 1 for all learners and at level 3 for 16-18-year- olds slow progress in improving retention unsatisfactory key skills management and outcomes insufficient focus on learning poor setting and review of targets for learners the inconsistent application of quality assurance arrangements to improve provision.
p.8
Contributory grades:
Train to Gain Good: Grade 2 Learners aged 14-16 Good: Grade 2 Learners aged 16-19 Unsatisfactory: Grade 4
p.9
Contributory grades:
12. Inspection agreed with the college’s view that achievement and standards are satisfactory. From a very low starting point, success rates have improved at all levels and for all age groups apart from learners aged 16-18 at level 3. However, many remain below national rates. On long courses for learners aged 16-18 success rates remain low at level 1, similar to the national average at level 2 and consistently low with little improvement at level 3. For adults, level 1 long programmes have seen significant improvement but remain low. At levels 2 and 3 success rates have improved and are above the national average. NVQ success rates for all ages are improved and high. Success rates for general national vocational qualifications (GNVQ) and precursors at levels 2 and 3, and AS courses for 16-18 learners show declining trends and have particularly low success rates. Level 2 GNVQ and precursors have declined by 24% over a three year period. The success
p.9
Contributory grades:
rates on AS courses have declined from 57% during 2004/05 to 47% during 2006/07.
p.9
Contributory grades:
13. Low retention rates were a weakness at the last inspection. Although the college has retained a significant focus on improving retention rates, they have remained a low 78% between 2005 and 2007. Current year records for 2007/08, of retention, attendance and punctuality identify improvements. However, the college’s lack of systematic monitoring against previous years data makes comparison difficult. The combined key skills success rate is slightly below the national average. However, key skills success rates at level 2 are low. Success rates for key skills communication have remained at 35% over the last two years. Application of number success rates were 33% in 2005/06 and 34% during 2006/07.
p.9
Contributory grades:
14. Success rates for the college’s wider remit work are good overall. T2G overall success was high during 2006/07 at 84% and early returns for 2007/08 are 85%. The overall and timely successes of apprentices are much improved and well above national rates. Advanced apprentices overall success rates are similar to national rates and timely rates are high. Apprenticeship high success rates disguise some underperformance in vehicle maintenance. The progression rates for E2E programmes have improved from 49% during 2005/06 to a current 54%, which is close to the expected average.
p.9
Contributory grades:
15. The standard of learners’ work and acquisition of workplace skills is generally good. Learners aged 14-16 produce good work and their success rates are high. Skill development and the acquisition of industrial levels of competency are particularly good in engineering and construction. Learners develop good conversational language in modern foreign languages and some art and design learners producing outstanding work in textiles. In ICT, there are too few opportunities to develop work related skills.
p.9
Contributory grades:
Work-based learning Good: Grade 2 Train to Gain Good: Grade 2 Learners aged 14-16 Good: Grade 2 Learners aged 19+ Good: Grade 2
p.10
Contributory grades:
16. Teaching and learning are satisfactory, which is lower than the college’s own self-assessment. The college’s judgements are drawn mainly from observation of teaching and learning. Some observation records focus on students’ learning and provide teachers with clear guidance on how to improve. However, many are not sufficiently rigorous with observers placing insufficient attention on whether students are learning and making progress. Some grades are too high and most do not provide constructive feedback to the teacher.
p.10
Contributory grades:
17. Well planned lessons include a good range of activities that engage and challenge all learners. In construction, teachers check learners’ understanding through imaginative use of information and learning technology (ILT) and quizzes. In art and design, teachers use interesting assignments that stimulate and motivate learners. Very effective links between the workplace and the college reinforce learning for apprentices. In ICT, planning is not sufficiently focused on students’ learning and they do not have sufficient opportunity to apply their learning in the workplace.
p.10
Contributory grades:
18. A small team of advanced practitioners and subject learning coaches provide good support for teachers. Whilst there is evidence of impact in individual subjects, opportunities to share good practice are not maximised. Teachers generally are well qualified and experienced. Learning resources are good in most areas. Inspectors agree with the college that the use of ILT and the college virtual learning environment (VLE) needs to be increased.
p.10
Contributory grades:
19. The management and delivery of key skills have not improved sufficiently since the last inspection. Enthusiastic liaison teachers have successfully supported improvements in some curriculum areas. However, the strategy is insufficiently led and managed and rates of improvement are inconsistent across the college. Not all learners see the relevance or importance of key skills.
p.10
Contributory grades:
20. Learners complete literacy and numeracy assessments early in their course with diagnostic testing used appropriately to identify those needing specific help. Learners receive help quickly, including those on work-based programmes. Although well managed, the college does not carry out an overall analysis of the impact of these services on learners’ success. 21. Assessment feedback to learners is satisfactory. However, the use of individual learning plans to set learners targets for achievement and to monitor their progress is poor in most areas. Targets are often vague and do not help students to understand what they need to do to improve their chances of success.
p.10
Contributory grades:
22. The college is highly responsive to community needs and those of its learners. Good collaborative partnerships help the college offer a very broad and diverse curriculum. Young learners attend a well established and award winning school links provision. Seven hundred scouts and guides attend classes that challenge occupational stereotypes. The college’s extensive consortium arrangements provide a broad spectrum of training and education linked to employment and the accreditation of work related skills. Employer engagement is good on apprenticeship programme and well planned English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) provision is provided in the workplace. Despite changes in national priorities, a responsive community-learning offer continues to serve local needs.
p.11
Contributory grades:
23. Cross college and curriculum enrichment is very diverse and sensitively planned; for instance, the prize-winning cheerleaders evolved in response to the limited sporting activities for women. However, timetable clashes limit access to activities. Most mainstream courses include work placement opportunities but some do not.
p.11
Contributory grades:
24. Information, advice and guidance overall are satisfactory. The college responds promptly, providing well managed support for learners with personal or particular learning needs. New learners value the pre-enrolment taster days and the allocation of student mentors. The college strongly promotes healthy lifestyles. The well conceived ‘Choices’ project developed young Asian men as sexual health mentors. Counsellors provide both one- to-one assistance and group sessions to raise learner’s awareness of emotional health. Links to other specialist services are well established.
p.11
Contributory grades:
25. The new code of behaviour, negotiated with students, combined with related staff development, has effectively improved student attitudes and behaviour. Guidance on careers and higher education is satisfactory. Induction is satisfactory. Subject teams deliver customised sessions with core generic activities. Counsellors provide both one-to-one assistance and proactive group sessions to help students’ emotional health. Links to other specialist services are well established and improving. Activities on-site and elsewhere are systematically managed to minimise risk to learner safety. Pastoral support is good. However, tutorials vary in quality and content with some reviews showing little evidence of detailed and measurable targets set for learners. Parents and carers are not always kept informed of their young peoples’ progress.
p.11
Contributory grades:
26. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Managers set clear strategic objectives that staff understand and share. Senior managers have successfully developed an inclusive team approach to leading and managing the college. However, this has not yet had sufficient impact on improving provision, retention and success rates in some curriculum areas. In other areas, for example, work-based learning, T2G and construction, improvements have been significant. Communication is strong. Regular meetings and a weekly briefing from the principal informs staff. Staff value the management initiative of ‘walking the job’ to review the quality of provision and to improve communication. Actions to improve student behaviour and attendance and reduce persistent staff absence have been very successful.
p.12
Contributory grades:
27. Partnership arrangements are strong, a strength identified at the last inspection. The college works collaboratively with a wide range of partners in innovative and effective ways. The college is highly regarded by its partners, taking the lead on two successful consortium arrangements involving E2E and T2G provision. These good partnerships plan strategically as they inform and support the development of the educational, social and skills infrastructure in the region.
p.12
Contributory grades:
28. Governors reflect the profile of the local community and bring a wide range of skill and experience to the college. They are well informed, understand the challenges facing the college and closely monitor the college’s performance. They appraise the executive management as a collective team in addition to individual reviews. They effectively inform and support the college’s strategic direction, but have failed to sufficiently influence timely improvement in some underperforming provision.
p.12
Contributory grades:
29. Equality of opportunity is good and promoted well throughout the college. The college responds promptly to complaints and diversity data are effectively analysed with good actions taken to improve underperformance. For example, externally funded projects have led to the development of good materials to market positive role models to students. Initiatives in some curriculum areas have successfully attracted under represented non- traditional groups to their courses. The college complies with the requirements of the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 and the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2002 (SENDA). The college has thorough arrangements for safeguarding young people and vulnerable adults.
p.12
Contributory grades:
30. The impact of quality assurance arrangements across the provision is unsatisfactory. Improvement in success and retention rates has been slow in some areas of the curriculum. Inspectors found the outcomes from observations of teaching and learning did not lead to effective plans for improvement. Observation records insufficiently identify good practice or effectively informed performance reviews of any training and development needs. Management information provides accessible, reliable and comprehensive data on learners’ performance and attendance in most areas. However, the college does not use data to analyse or measure the impact of additional learning support. In some curriculum areas, staff do not use the information available sufficiently to plan for improvement. Self-assessment, development planning and target setting in some curriculum areas are insufficiently analytical and measurable, and improvements are slow.
p.12
Contributory grades:
31. Accommodation is satisfactory and some specialist resources are good, particularly in arts and media, and engineering. However, ILT resources to support teaching and learning are insufficient. Staff are appropriately qualified and have access to regular professional updating. Financial management is good. The college overall provides satisfactory value for money.
p.13
Context
32. The college offers a range of programmes in motor vehicle, manufacturing, fabrication and welding, electrical installation and electronics engineering. There are currently 1,654 learners, 484 are full-time, 1,170 part-time, 51% are adults and 49% are aged 16-18. There are 116 apprentices and 90 advanced apprentices on engineering apprenticeships, and 174 learners on T2G programmes. There are also 196 learners aged 14-16 from local partner schools. The college achieved CoVE status in November 2003 for computer- aided design and manufacture.
p.14
Strengths
high success rates at levels 2 and 3 good development of practical skills good specialist training resources broad curriculum responsive to employer needs.
p.14
Areas for improvement
low retention on most level 1 programmes low motor vehicle advanced apprenticeship success rates.
p.14
Achievement and standards
33. Achievement and standards are good. Many of 2006/07 success rates were high and above the national rates. The levels 2 and 3 electrical courses and the level 3 manufacturing courses have high success rates. The intermediate certificate in engineering and technology has consistently high success rates over a three year period. BTEC national diploma in manufacturing engineering has significantly improved with particularly high rates for 2006/07. Although achievement rates are generally good at level 1, retention rates on most courses are low, for example, the certificate in welding and fabrication, the BTEC introductory diploma in engineering and the award in vehicle maintenance programmes. Although much improved, the success rates for advanced apprentices on motor vehicle programmes remain below the national average. Success rates in key skills are poor. The progression of learners to higher levels and into employment is good.
p.14
Achievement and standards
34. The standard of learners’ work in practical lessons is good. Learners make good progress towards achieving their qualification and develop good practical skills in all occupational areas. The department regularly celebrates success at awards events. Attendance is good.
p.14
Quality of provision
35. Teaching and learning of practical subjects are good. Lessons are well planned, effectively structured and stimulate productive learning. Teachers use their good occupational skills effectively to support learners’ development in practical lessons. Good use of ILT supports and enhances learning. Learners use electronics simulation software programmes proficiently to design and test electronic circuits. In some theory lessons teachers fail to check individuals’ understanding. The standard of key skills teaching is inconsistent. Some courses follow college guidance and integrate key skills effectively into core curriculum units whilst others do not.
p.15
Quality of provision
36. Assessment is good in practical lessons and learners’ progress is well monitored. A wide range of courses widens learners’ experience and enables good progression, including apprenticeships. Many employers engage with the college through its CoVE in computer-aided design and manufacture. The college is very responsive to employers, providing bespoke programmes to meet their needs.
p.15
Quality of provision
37. Support, advice and guidance are satisfactory. All learners complete initial assessment at enrolment. Additional support is timely with most learners receiving additional support outside their vocational classes.
p.15
Leadership and management
38. Leadership and management are good. Management have adopted an open style approach and walk the floor regularly. There is a clear focus on improving teaching, learning and communication. The self-assessment report sufficiently identifies the key strengths and areas for improvement. Managers and staff have access to accurate data on the college portal on learner attendance. Staff use this information very effectively to improve retention on many programmes.
p.15
Leadership and management
39. The engineering workshops have a good wide range of specialist resources in all curriculum areas. The promotion and monitoring of equality and opportunity is good.
p.15
Context
40. The college provides programmes in plumbing, trowel trades, wood occupations and technician studies from levels 1 to 3. The majority of the 947 enrolments are 16-18-year-old learners, 59 are advanced apprentices and 195 apprentices. The college provides training and assessment in the workplace for 57 Train to Gain learners in brickwork and site joinery skills.
p.16
Strengths
high success rates on construction crafts and advanced apprenticeship programmes good development of learners’ skills good activities to promote learning particularly effective monitoring of learner progress.
p.16
Areas for improvement
inadequate verification of assessment in the workplace insufficient focus on quality assurance to improve good practice.
p.16
Achievement and standards
41. Achievement and standards are good, success rates on construction crafts programmes and advanced apprenticeship programmes have been significantly above national rates for the last three years. Over the same period success rates on technician programmes have been at national rates. Key skill success rates vary with some sections below national rates. Learners’ skill development is good and match industrial levels of competence. Learners on craft programmes have successfully gained national skill awards. Current attendance at 88% is good. Standards of written evidence in porfolios and learner files are also good.
p.16
Quality of provision
42. Teaching and learning are good. Most lessons are well planned and managed. Better lessons link to previous topics and progressively develop the subject area. Tutors make good use of a detailed learners’ profile in planning contents to meet the needs of individual learners. Tutors use a good range of activities to promote learning. Quizzes used at the start of the lesson are particularly effective at recapping key points from previous sessions. Tutors use ILT effectively. Learners particularly enjoy a software package replicating a popular game show that effectively checks learners’ understanding. The recent reorganisation of how key skills are taught is more successful in some areas than others. Assessment overall is satisfactory. Initial assessment is effective in identifying the need for literacy, numeracy and language support. Construction staff act promptly, providing one-to-one additional support. Verification of assessment in the
p.16
Quality of provision
workplace is inadequate. The college has yet to complete any direct workplace observations. Monitoring of learner progress is particularly effective with tutors making good use of an electronic system introduced on apprenticeship programmes, and paper based records on other programmes.
p.17
Quality of provision
43. A wide range of programmes satisfies learners and employers’ needs across most skill areas. Progression through the levels and onto higher education is good with any learners returning to act as role models. Learners have good access to one-to-one tutorials and the tutorial programme overall is satisfactory. Guidance and support for learners are also good; although, some support services are not available on the construction training site over the whole week. Good initiatives are in place to widen participation including a Saturday club for young people interested in construction trades.
p.17
Leadership and management
44. Leadership and management are good. The area has made significant progress since the last inspection in raising success rates and improving the learner’s experience. Many new initiatives are being introduced with some staff adapting more successfully than other to the improved and good access to management information and its use in self-assessment. Communication within the sections and with senior staff is good. However, strategies to more effectively disseminate and share good and emerging practices are still being developed. Promotion of equality of opportunity is good. Resources overall are good. Staff are well qualified and supported to develop their skills further.
p.17
Context
45. The college offers courses at level 1 to level 3. There are 202 full-time learners in ICT, of which 181 are 16-18. The majority of these are undertaking vocational courses at foundation, intermediate and advanced levels at the main campus. Overall, some 40% of learners are adults undertaking part-time ICT courses on applications software and information technology technician courses in a number of community venues.
p.18
Strengths
high success rates for level 1 provision wide range of provision at all levels.
p.18
Areas for improvement
low success rates for full-time level 3 courses insufficient focus on learning poor use of additional learning support in class insufficient opportunities to experience the workplace unreliability of resources to support learning inadequate quality assurance.
p.18
Achievement and standards
46. Full-time success rates for 16-18 year olds at level 3 are low and declining. The college has made slow progress in reviewing and resolving the decline. Pass rates on key skills have improved by 22% but remain below national rates. Success rates are high on level 1 programmes, particularly on the BTEC introductory award. During 2006/07, adult success rates at level 1 significantly improved. The area has improving attendance rates with inspectors noting 100% attendance in one class.
p.18
Quality of provision
47. Teaching and learning are unsatisfactory. Lesson plans and schemes of work fail to identify learning outcomes and teachers fail to check if learning has occurred. The VLE is underdeveloped and there is poor use of ILT in class or as planned additional learning. In better sessions, tutors effectively use quizzes to consolidate learning.
p.18
Quality of provision
48. Arrangements for in class additional learning support are poor. Liaison between staff is limited and session planning does not make best use of specialist tutors. Individual learning plans vary in quality and many lack appropriate targets. Tutorial schemes of work are weak and focus mainly on learners completing assignments. Assessment procedures are satisfactory and meet awarding body requirements. Students received appropriate detailed written and verbal feedback on their work. 49. The college offers a good and varied range of provision to attract a diverse learner profile. Progression routes through levels are satisfactory, as is the number progressing to higher education. There are insufficient opportunities to experience the workplace. Few learners have work placements, attend trips into the workplace or have the contact with visiting speakers.
p.18
Quality of provision
50. Information, advice and guidance are satisfactory. The college is currently reviewing the entry criteria of its ICT programmes. Adequate guidance, such as subject interviews and information sessions, provide learners with comprehensive programme information. Progression rates are satisfactory with 25% of learners progressing from BTEC introductory to BTEC first, and 47% progressing from BTEC first to applied A level. Progression to higher education has declined over the past three years from a good 80% to 60%.
p.19
Leadership and management
51. Leadership and management are unsatisfactory. Although many areas for improvement at level 3 are identified through self-assessment over a three year period, staff did not identify failings in quality assurance in remedying and improving standards. Lesson observations lack rigour with few robust actions to improve teaching and learning. The minutes of course team meetings have few actions and where actions are identified these are not discussed at subsequent meetings. Equality for students from different backgrounds is satisfactory.
p.19
Leadership and management
52. The management of resources to support learning is poor. Some ICT rooms are cramped and one of the two interactive whiteboards has been broken for a number of weeks. Although the majority of classrooms have projectors and overhead projectors (OHPs), some computers are slow to log onto the network at the main site. The learning resource centre has adequate drop-in computing facilities and a good selection of ICT related books. The majority of staff have teaching qualifications and a significant amount of staff development has taken place; however, there is no formal procedure for monitoring the impact of this.
p.19
Context
53. The college offers art and design, music, media and performing arts courses at levels 2 and 3. There is some level 4 provision in design. Currently 513 learners follow full-time programmes, of which 65 are adults. One hundred and ninety learners follow part-time programmes. Art and design, music and media courses are located on the Highfields site, and media on a town centre site. Both are a short distance from the main college.
p.20
Strengths
good success rates on most full-time courses high standard of student work good teaching and learning very good accommodation and resources good progression rates.
p.20
Areas for improvement
low success rate on BTEC national diploma in performing arts in 2006/07 weak target setting for students inadequate technician support in performing arts.
p.20
Achievement and standards
54. Success rates on full-time programmes are good, some have improving trends and many are above the national average. Some level 2 courses are significantly above the national average. During 2006/07, retention and success rates were low on BTEC national diploma in performing arts. However, current in-year retention appears improved. Key skills success rates are low. Progression rates between levels are good, as is progression into higher education. Practical work is of a high standard. Some learners work in textiles is outstanding. There is good work in observational drawing, which was an inspection weakness last time. Attendance and punctuality during inspection were satisfactory.
p.20
Quality of provision
55. Teaching and learning are good. Teaching is particularly well structured and challenging on level 2 courses. Much teaching is motivational, stimulating and often fun. Assignments are well planned, interesting and engage students’ interest. Verbal and written feedback is good and gives clear advice for improvement. Students enjoy their studies, are able to manage their learning and to work collaboratively. Some good industry links are established. Textiles students work with a local vintage clothing shop on a recycling theme. Companies hiring the college theatre involve the performing arts learners in front of house duties. Good use is made of ILT with specialist digital sites specifically developed to set and mark work online for music technology learners. Computers are easily accessible and well used as a creative tool in art lessons.
p.20
Quality of provision
56. The setting of learners’ achievement and progression targets is poor. Learners’ individual learning plans and achievement targets do not take sufficient account of their previous attainment and achievement. Subsequent progress is not monitored in terms of added value or whether learners are achieving at expected levels. Assessment and internal verification is satisfactory.
p.21
Quality of provision
57. Some good industry links provide a wide range of experience for learners such as textiles students working with a local shop on a recycling clothing theme. Companies hiring the college theatre facilities, hire learners to help with productions. Arrangements to support learner’s additional learning needs are satisfactory with good collaborative working between curriculum and specialist staff. Many students cannot access college enrichment programmes. However, the curriculum area has satisfactory levels of course specific enrichment.
p.21
Quality of provision
58. Guidance and support for learners are good. Learners’ additional learning needs are appropriately identified and supported at the start of their programme.
p.21
Leadership and management
59. Leadership and management are satisfactory. There have been recent management changes but inconsistent practice still remains between the subject areas. The self-assessment report is generally accurate but not all judgements match those of inspection. Teams regularly monitor the resulting operational action plans. The college has discontinued many of the adult programmes with low success rates. Staff can easily access management information systems but do not always use data as an effective management tool for improvement. Best use is not made of aspects of good practice between the arts teams. This was a weakness at the last inspection.
p.21
Leadership and management
60. Accommodation and facilities are very good, secure and highly valued by staff and learners. Inadequate technician support in performing arts affects learners’ productions and their ability to understand the technical aspects of theatre. The promotion of equality and diversity is good.
p.21
Context
61. The college offers courses in English and modern foreign languages from level 1 to level 3. Most of the 114 learners on GCSE, GCE AS and A2 level English courses are aged 16-18. The college offers a wide range of modern foreign languages courses in European and non-European languages. A significant majority of the 960 learners on modern foreign languages courses are adults studying part-time .
p.22
Strengths
high pass rates at A* to C in GCSE modern foreign languages good development of skills much good teaching and learning in modern foreign languages responsive curriculum that meets the needs of the local community, employers and learners.
p.22
Areas for improvement
low success rates in AS English insufficient planning of teaching to meet the needs of all learners insufficient focus on action planning for improvement.
p.22
Achievement and standards
62. Achievement and standards are satisfactory. Pass rates at grades A* to C are high on GCSE modern foreign languages courses. Pass rates at A* to C in English were low in 2007, but high the previous year. Success rates for AS English language and literature are consistently low and below the national average. Retention is low on several courses.
p.22
Achievement and standards
63. Most learners who complete their courses make good progress. They make good contributions to discussions and understand and use key vocabulary and specialist terminology. Learners’ written work is accurate and of a high standard. They develop good study skills and helpful strategies in preparation for examinations. Learners on modern foreign languages courses are confident to ask questions in the foreign language and demonstrate good understanding of foreign languages spoken at natural speed.
p.22
Quality of provision
64. Teaching and learning are satisfactory overall, with much good teaching of modern foreign languages. In good lessons, teachers use a variety of resources, including ILT to stimulate learning and extend the learners’ experience, such as well designed learning activities, games and quizzes. In these lessons, learners clearly enjoy their learning, are enthusiastic and keen to contribute their ideas. In less effective lessons students are insufficiently involved, lose interest with over long activities or non-stimulating learning resources. Too many lessons do not take sufficient account of all learners needs. In less effective lessons teachers do not monitor learners’ progress effectively or clearly identify targets for improvement.
p.22
Quality of provision
65. The college offers a good range of courses to meet the needs of the local community, employers and learners. Foreign languages courses recruit well, take place at different levels and in several venues during the day and in the evening. Flexible, tailor-made provision is available to employers. Initial information, advice and guidance are overall satisfactory, although some learners’ on part-time programmes have insufficient contact before starting the programme.
p.23
Leadership and management
66. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Organisation of courses is good and there are clear communications within teams. Staff generally work well together to share best practice and to develop strategies and resources for teaching and learning. Teachers respond well to the views of learners. Comments from modern foreign language learners have led to changes in the types of courses offered, provided and assessed.
p.23
Leadership and management
67. Judgements in the self-assessment report are broadly accurate but some areas for improvement are not included in the action plan. Actions to address underperformance are not specific or measurable. Timescales and responsibilities for actions lack definition and the level of quality when monitoring progress is variable. The promotion of equality of opportunity and diversity is good.
p.23
Context
68. The college provides Skills for Life programmes for 1,956 learners of whom 177 are full-time. The college provides English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) courses from entry level to level 2 in a number of college, community and workplace contexts. Some 215 learners are working towards GCSE maths via a progressive structured set of qualifications. All full-time learners have an entitlement for three key skills up to level 2. Current numbers are communications 2,243, application of number 3,227, and information technology (IT) 2,564.
p.24
Strengths
high pass rates in GCSE maths, literacy and numeracy national tests at level 1 good progression within Skills for Life and ESOL good teaching in Skills for Life and ESOL responsive provision in Skills for Life and ESOL strong leadership and management with focus on improvement in Skills for Life and ESOL.
p.24
Areas for improvement
low success rates in ESOL and key skills level 2 insufficient use of individual learning plans and monitoring of targets in ESOL and key skills lack of monitoring and formal improvement strategies in key skills.
p.24
Achievement and standards
69. Achievement and standards overall are satisfactory. GCSE maths pass rates are high, as are literacy and numeracy pass rates for level 1 national tests. ESOL success rates are low, particularly at level 2. Key skills level 2 success rates are low overall in communication and application of number but there is great variability across the college. Progress between levels and to accredited courses is good. Many learners are well motivated, make good progress, gain confidence and self-esteem. Standards of learners’ work are satisfactory overall. In key skills underpinning skills are not always sufficiently well developed. Retention remains an issue for ESOL.
p.24
Quality of provision
70. The quality of provision is satisfactory. There is much good teaching in ESOL and Skills for Life. In good lessons, tutors clearly identify learning outcomes that link well to varied activities to engage learners and stimulate learning. Good use is made of ICT and teachers use effective questioning techniques. In the less effective lessons there is little variation, activities are overly tutor led and key skills have insufficient links to vocational context. 71. Initial and diagnostic assessment effectively informs Skills for Life learners’ individual learning plans (ILPs) and appropriate targets. However, ESOL and key skills ILPs are less effectively linked to learning and predicted progress. Accreditation requirements overly influence key skills ILPs rather than the needs of learners.
p.24
Quality of provision
72. The range of provision is good and responsive. Flexible timetabling, gender specific courses, childcare and workplace provision suit the needs of a wide range of learners. Good links are established between Skills for Life and ESOL programmes, and T2G employer based provision. In ESOL, courses link well to citizenship and job-related modules.
p.25
Quality of provision
73. Satisfactory guidance and advice is available to all learners supported by good induction processes. Teachers and ESOL development officers provide sensitive pastoral care and effective agency links. However, there are only three development officers to support the larger number of ESOL learners. Additional learning support is adequate. Part-time learners have no identified tutorial time, though teachers take constructive opportunities during class time for individual discussion.
p.25
Leadership and management
74. Leadership and management of Skills for Life and ESOL are good. Managers have a good understanding of their areas and are developing sound processes for improving quality. They use data effectively to inform action plans and monitor progress. There is a strong team approach to on-going review and improvement. Appraisal links well to improvement actions and changing learners needs. Self-assessment is broadly accurate though somewhat descriptive. Sharing of good practice, including materials is common and effective. Quality assurance and the monitoring of strategies to improve key skills are poor. The quality of judgements and grades during observations of teaching and learning for key skills is variable. The promotion of equality and diversity is good with a good representation of staff from ethnic groups.
p.25
Table 1
Success rates on mainstream level 1 qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2005 to 2007, compared with the national rates for colleges of a similar type.
p.26
Table 1
16-18 19+ Notional Level Exp End Year Starts – Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts – Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff 1 Long 04/05 872 59 65 -6 3,767 48 62 -14 05/06 919 62 69 -7 2,912 58 65 -7 06/07* 667 67 1,635 62 04/05 47 68 68 0 1 100 64 36 GNVQs and 05/06 precursors 06/07* N/A N/A NVQs 04/05 141 73 68 5 91 85 66 19 05/06 140 86 72 14 28 93 74 19 06/07* 98 86 22 74 Other 04/05 684 55 64 -9 3,675 47 62 -15 05/06 779 58 69 -11 2,884 58 65 -7 06/07* 569 64 1,613 62 * college data (use where complete, validated and produced using proprietary software)
p.26
Table 2
Success rates on mainstream level 2 qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2005 to 2007, compared with the national rates for colleges of a similar type.
p.26
Table 2
* college data (use where complete, validated and produced using proprietary software) 16-18 19+ Notional Level Exp End Year Starts – Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts – Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff 2 Long 04/05 1,428 62 61 1 1,563 62 60 2 05/06 1,370 69 66 3 1,577 68 66 2 06/07* 1,443 71 1,214 73 GCSEs 04/05 267 49 64 -15 258 67 63 4 05/06 237 61 68 -7 183 66 67 -1 06/07* 192 60 183 81 04/05 68 76 67 9 23 48 75 -27 GNVQs and 05/06 74 51 69 -18 23 39 68 -29 precursors 06/07* 21 52 20 55 NVQs 04/05 399 59 57 2 283 57 60 -3 05/06 272 73 65 8 448 80 67 13 06/07* 353 70 261 80 Other 04/05 694 67 61 6 999 63 59 4 05/06 787 71 66 5 923 63 65 -2 06/07* 877 74 750 70
p.26
Table 3
Success rates on mainstream level 3 qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2005 to 2007, compared with the national rates for colleges of a similar type.
p.27
Table 3
16-18 19+ Notional Level Exp End Year Starts – Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts – Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff
p.27
Table 3
3 Long 04/05 1,395 60 68 -8 1,504 58 58 0 05/06 1,499 64 70 -6 1,359 63 63 0 06/07* 1,371 63 1,177 68 A/A2 04/05 96 75 86 -11 112 67 69 -2 Levels 05/06 109 79 87 -8 90 79 72 7 06/07* 84 81 82 80 AS Levels 04/05 391 57 66 -9 234 48 52 -4 05/06 377 55 67 -12 254 48 55 -7 06/07* 303 47 198 62 04/05 127 37 61 -24 42 33 54 -21 GNVQs and 05/06 119 52 66 -14 37 51 57 -6 precursors 06/07* 38 37 14 71 NVQs 04/05 61 77 63 14 209 69 56 13 05/06 60 67 71 -4 202 64 63 1 06/07* 50 82 145 63 Other 04/05 720 63 60 3 907 58 59 -1 05/06 834 68 65 3 776 65 64 1 06/07* 896 67 738 70 * college data (use where complete, validated and produced using proprietary software)
p.27
Table 4
Outcomes on Train to Gain programmes (T2G) managed by the college 2006 to 2007.
p.28
Table 4
Programme End Year Success rate No. of learners* Provider/college NVQ rate** overall 405 84% 2006/07 timely 155 55% overall 1,081 85% Train to Gain *** 2007/08 (7 months) timely 822 72%
p.28
Table 4
Note: 2007-08 data is ‘part year’ only and is representative of the first 3 months or greater of the LSC contract year
p.28
Table 4
* Learners who leave later than originally planned are counted in the year they actually leave. This group of learners are then added to the learners who planned to complete in a given year and did so or left earlier than planned ** College/provider qualification success rates are calculated using LSC published data derived from the ‘Individual Learning Record’ *** Includes ‘Train to Gain’ long course NVQ provision, but not ‘Skills for Life’
p.28
Table 5
Success rates on work-based learning programmes managed by the college 2005 to
p.28
Table 5
Programme End Year Success rate No. of learners Provider NVQ rate National NVQ rate Provider framework rate National framework rate overall 68 59 49 34 35 04/05 timely 75 37 31 24 22 overall 67 67 54 46 44 05/06 timely 50 54 34 32 27 overall 84 71 64 57 58 Advanced Apprenticeships
p.28
Table 5
06/07 timely 82 55 43 44 37 overall 142 73 52 55 40 04/05 timely 68 31 29 24 23 overall 296 52 59 47 53 05/06 timely 288 43 38 39 34 overall 232 81 65 75 61 Apprenticeships
p.28
Table 6
Outcomes on Entry to Employment (E2E) programmes managed by the college 2005 to 2007.
p.29
Table 6
* These are key objectives identified for each learner following an E2E programme ** Progression is measured in terms learners’ movement to further education, education and employment, during or at the end of their training period
p.29
Table 6
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Year Number of leavers in the year Achieved objectives rate* Progression rate**
p.29
Table 6
2005/06 1306 74% 49% 2006/07 1100 77% 50% 2007/08 (7 months) 613 79% 54%
p.29
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion