Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Mar 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

West Lancs Investment Centre (lead), Maple View

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Maple View, West Lancs Investment Centre

  • Postcode verified

    DL6 1AE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearimprovingimprovedhigh qualityfeel safeenjoyhappystrengths
Criticismnot yetnot improvedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings525w+64
  • Leadership568w+66
  • What needs to improve20w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,109
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 49%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Version 1 – January 2008 28 February 2008

p.1

Mr S Hanscombe Headteacher Mill Hill Community Primary School Crosby Road Northallerton North Yorkshire DL6 1AE

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Following my visit to your school on 27 February 2008, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in May 2007. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – good

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

Newly qualified teachers may only be appointed with the agreement of the lead inspector.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors and the Corporate Director for Children and Young People’s Services for North Yorkshire.

p.1

Lead Inspector

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

The inspector observed some of the school’s work, scrutinised documents and spoke with key staff including the headteacher and deputy headteacher. In addition, discussions were held with pupils, governors, representatives from the local authority (LA) and a small number of parents. A meeting was also held with the previous acting headteacher.

p.2

Evidence

The main focus of this monitoring visit was to establish what progress had been made in relation to one specific area for improvement relating to the stability of leadership and management. The other areas for improvement identified in the May 2007 inspection were not inspected.

p.2

Context

The acting headteacher and deputy headteacher present at the last monitoring visit have now left as planned. A new permanent, full-time headteacher and deputy headteacher took up their posts in January 2008. A new teacher for one of the Year 3/4 classes has also been appointed and took up position in February. Two additional governors have also been appointed. The school’s long-term financial status remains fragile and the school faces staffing reorganisation to rectify this situation. A three- year financial plan is now in place and the LA has approved the budget.

p.2

Achievement and standards

This aspect was not a focus of the monitoring visit. Indications are that the actions taken to raise achievement and standards observed at the last monitoring visit are continuing to help improve pupils’ progress.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:

p.2

Achievement and standards

 Raise achievement and standards in English, mathematics and science – not

p.2

Personal development and well-being

The personal development and well-being of the pupils was not a focus of this inspection. However, as at the last monitoring visit, pupils feel safe, enjoy coming to school and are happy to learn. Most pupils behave well in lessons and speak favourably of the clear rewards, sanctions and strategies now in place to further improve behaviour.

p.2

Quality of provision

The quality of provision was not a main focus of this monitoring visit. However, within a short time of being in school the headteacher has evaluated the quality of the provision in terms of its strengths and areas to develop. A clear focus remains on improving the curriculum and the quality of teaching and learning.

p.3

Quality of provision

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:

p.3

Quality of provision

 Improve teaching, particularly by raising the level of challenge, especially for the more able pupils – not evaluated

p.3

Leadership and management

A successful handover from the acting headteacher has allowed the new headteacher and deputy headteacher to quickly establish their positions. They have provided the first permanent leadership in the school for a long time, quickly developing an effective working relationship between themselves, staff and pupils. All involved with the school welcome the sense of permanence they have brought.

p.3

Leadership and management

Within days of taking up his post the headteacher reviewed the work of the school and this has led, for example, to changes in the school day so that time is now used better for teaching and learning. Improvement planning has been developed to focus on what the school needs over the next few years rather than on a term-by-term basis. A clear commitment has been made to the professional development of staff. This is focused on improving teaching and learning; involving, for example, teachers visiting partnership schools to share and observe good practice.

p.3

Leadership and management

This improved stability provided by the senior leadership has meant subject leaders in English, mathematics and science are now feeling more empowered to take on responsibility. Support from the LA and partnership schools has helped clarify leaders’ roles so they are clear what actions they need to take to ensure improvement. Overall, these subject leaders are now more confident in monitoring their area of responsibility. They realise that other colleagues will need to be held more to account to ensure that improvement continues. However, leadership and management in information and communication technology have not yet improved enough.

p.3

Leadership and management

Work on improving governance is continuing. Governors have received training on their roles and responsibilities and they are becoming more strategically involved in the management of the school. The headteacher and deputy headteacher have helped the governing body in redesigning the committee structure to provide more rigour in the monitoring of progress made by the school. Key governors now attend review meetings and are starting to hold the school more to account. However, it is too early for the full impact of these changes to be felt. Governors are helping to revise the staffing structure of the school and understand the steps needed to deal with the fragile financial situation. Support and challenge by governors linked, for example, to subjects such as numeracy and literacy has improved. The headteacher understands what work there is to do, after such a turbulent past, to ensure that the school has a clear strategic direction, is truly accountable for its

p.3

Leadership and management

performance and has secure leadership and management at all levels. Improving the curriculum is seen as a clear priority as is ensuring rigorous high quality professional standards across all areas of the school. The school is very keen to work more closely with parents. Recently introduced whole-class assemblies are proving very popular with parents and pupils alike.

p.4

Leadership and management

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:

p.4

Leadership and management

 Ensure long-term stability in leadership and management in order to provide a secure foundation for improvement – good

p.4

External support

The LA continues to provide good support for the school. The new headteacher has been supported well to help him settle in quickly. His professional development needs have been assessed and opportunities for additional training have been made available. Considerations have also been given as to the support the new deputy headteacher may require. Through the school improvement partner and LA advisers support for subject leaders and teachers in the Foundation Stage has continued.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 The issues identified in the inspection of May 2007 and the first monitoring visit remain the school’s main priorities.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion