Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Maple View, West Lancs Investment Centre
- Postcode verified
DL6 1AE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes9
“Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory” p.1Parents & families2
“The school is very keen to work more closely with parents.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,109
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Version 1 – January 2008 28 February 2008
p.1
Mr S Hanscombe Headteacher Mill Hill Community Primary School Crosby Road Northallerton North Yorkshire DL6 1AE
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
Following my visit to your school on 27 February 2008, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in May 2007. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
Progress since previous monitoring inspection – good
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
Newly qualified teachers may only be appointed with the agreement of the lead inspector.
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.1
COMMUNITY PRIMARY SCHOOL
I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors and the Corporate Director for Children and Young People’s Services for North Yorkshire.
p.1
Lead Inspector
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 hcarnall@cfbt.com
p.1
Evidence
The inspector observed some of the school’s work, scrutinised documents and spoke with key staff including the headteacher and deputy headteacher. In addition, discussions were held with pupils, governors, representatives from the local authority (LA) and a small number of parents. A meeting was also held with the previous acting headteacher.
p.2
Evidence
The main focus of this monitoring visit was to establish what progress had been made in relation to one specific area for improvement relating to the stability of leadership and management. The other areas for improvement identified in the May 2007 inspection were not inspected.
p.2
Context
The acting headteacher and deputy headteacher present at the last monitoring visit have now left as planned. A new permanent, full-time headteacher and deputy headteacher took up their posts in January 2008. A new teacher for one of the Year 3/4 classes has also been appointed and took up position in February. Two additional governors have also been appointed. The school’s long-term financial status remains fragile and the school faces staffing reorganisation to rectify this situation. A three- year financial plan is now in place and the LA has approved the budget.
p.2
Achievement and standards
This aspect was not a focus of the monitoring visit. Indications are that the actions taken to raise achievement and standards observed at the last monitoring visit are continuing to help improve pupils’ progress.
p.2
Achievement and standards
Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:
p.2
Achievement and standards
Raise achievement and standards in English, mathematics and science – not
p.2
Personal development and well-being
The personal development and well-being of the pupils was not a focus of this inspection. However, as at the last monitoring visit, pupils feel safe, enjoy coming to school and are happy to learn. Most pupils behave well in lessons and speak favourably of the clear rewards, sanctions and strategies now in place to further improve behaviour.
p.2
Quality of provision
The quality of provision was not a main focus of this monitoring visit. However, within a short time of being in school the headteacher has evaluated the quality of the provision in terms of its strengths and areas to develop. A clear focus remains on improving the curriculum and the quality of teaching and learning.
p.3
Quality of provision
Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:
p.3
Quality of provision
Improve teaching, particularly by raising the level of challenge, especially for the more able pupils – not evaluated
p.3
Leadership and management
A successful handover from the acting headteacher has allowed the new headteacher and deputy headteacher to quickly establish their positions. They have provided the first permanent leadership in the school for a long time, quickly developing an effective working relationship between themselves, staff and pupils. All involved with the school welcome the sense of permanence they have brought.
p.3
Leadership and management
Within days of taking up his post the headteacher reviewed the work of the school and this has led, for example, to changes in the school day so that time is now used better for teaching and learning. Improvement planning has been developed to focus on what the school needs over the next few years rather than on a term-by-term basis. A clear commitment has been made to the professional development of staff. This is focused on improving teaching and learning; involving, for example, teachers visiting partnership schools to share and observe good practice.
p.3
Leadership and management
This improved stability provided by the senior leadership has meant subject leaders in English, mathematics and science are now feeling more empowered to take on responsibility. Support from the LA and partnership schools has helped clarify leaders’ roles so they are clear what actions they need to take to ensure improvement. Overall, these subject leaders are now more confident in monitoring their area of responsibility. They realise that other colleagues will need to be held more to account to ensure that improvement continues. However, leadership and management in information and communication technology have not yet improved enough.
p.3
Leadership and management
Work on improving governance is continuing. Governors have received training on their roles and responsibilities and they are becoming more strategically involved in the management of the school. The headteacher and deputy headteacher have helped the governing body in redesigning the committee structure to provide more rigour in the monitoring of progress made by the school. Key governors now attend review meetings and are starting to hold the school more to account. However, it is too early for the full impact of these changes to be felt. Governors are helping to revise the staffing structure of the school and understand the steps needed to deal with the fragile financial situation. Support and challenge by governors linked, for example, to subjects such as numeracy and literacy has improved. The headteacher understands what work there is to do, after such a turbulent past, to ensure that the school has a clear strategic direction, is truly accountable for its
p.3
Leadership and management
performance and has secure leadership and management at all levels. Improving the curriculum is seen as a clear priority as is ensuring rigorous high quality professional standards across all areas of the school. The school is very keen to work more closely with parents. Recently introduced whole-class assemblies are proving very popular with parents and pupils alike.
p.4
Leadership and management
Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:
p.4
Leadership and management
Ensure long-term stability in leadership and management in order to provide a secure foundation for improvement – good
p.4
External support
The LA continues to provide good support for the school. The new headteacher has been supported well to help him settle in quickly. His professional development needs have been assessed and opportunities for additional training have been made available. Considerations have also been given as to the support the new deputy headteacher may require. Through the school improvement partner and LA advisers support for subject leaders and teachers in the Foundation Stage has continued.
p.4
Priorities for further improvement
The issues identified in the inspection of May 2007 and the first monitoring visit remain the school’s main priorities.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion