Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nord Anglia Inspections (lead), Steve Isherwood

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nord Anglia Inspections, Steve Isherwood

  • Postcode verified

    CA25 5DG

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivepositivestrengthscleareffectivelymake good progresscaring
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesinconsistenciesbelowmissedvariablenot confidentvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings974w+43
  • Leadership508w+53
  • What needs to improve18w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,493
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Leadership 34%What needs to improve 1%

Full report text

Version 1 – Januaryr 2008 22 February 2008

p.1

Mrs E Jackson Heateacher St Patrick's Catholic Primary School Todholes Road Cleator Moor Cumbria CA25 5DG

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

Following my visit, to your school on 20 February 2008, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in May 2007. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – good

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

Newly qualified teachers may only be appointed with the agreement of the lead inspector.

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.

p.1

CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors, the Diocese of Lancaster and the Director of Children’s Services for Cumbria.

p.1

H M Inspector

Nord Anglia Inspections Anglia House Carrs Road Cheadle Stockport SK8 2LA T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0161 491 4191 Direct F 0161 491 9677

p.1

Evidence

Evidence was taken from observations of the school’s work, a scrutiny of documents and meetings with the headteacher, senior teachers, the governors and the school’s improvement officer. Information was also gathered from talking to pupils and by observing the school’s procedures for monitoring the quality of teaching and giving feedback to staff.

p.2

Context

Since the previous visit there have been no changes to staffing. Two new consultants for literacy and numeracy have been appointed by the local authority (LA). The governing body has increased in size following the appointment of an additional governor and a new clerk to the governors has joined the team.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Standards in all core areas are below the national average at age seven and slightly above average at age eleven, as reflected in the most recent teacher assessments and national tests for 2007. Nevertheless, pupils’ current work, together with the school’s own assessment information suggests that pupils are making better progress than previously. This is because the school has strengthened the way it monitors pupils’ performance and as a result, has a much clearer understanding of where improvement is required. Furthermore, the school’s initiatives for raising achievement are paying greater dividends. For example, pupils are making better progress in writing because of a whole-school focus on the moderation of their written work. Staff are taking greater responsibility for their actions and act more decisively in their analysis of data. Tracking systems are far more effective in identifying pupils who are

p.2

Achievement and standards

underachieving. As a consequence, support and intervention is planned more appropriately and staff have a greater awareness of the needs of individual learners. In addition, increased opportunities for pupils to use and apply their knowledge in lesson activities are leading to a faster rate of achievement, particularly in mathematics and science.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:

p.2

Achievement and standards

 Raise standards in writing, mathematics and science –satisfactory progress.

p.2

Personal development and well-being

Pupils’ good personal development is related directly to the strong family atmosphere in school and supports their progress well. Pupils behave well, are caring and considerate towards each other and are keen to succeed. They enjoy school a great deal, which is demonstrated by their positive attitudes to their work and by their enthusiasm for the wide range of activities that the school provides.

p.3

Quality of provision

Lessons observations conducted jointly by HMI with senior staff, confirm that the quality of teaching is improving. Teaching is now mainly good with some that is satisfactory which means that pupils are making better progress in their work. This has come about because teachers have improved their use of data about pupils’ prior attainment. Lessons are increasingly focused on individual needs with interesting activities that build well on prior knowledge and engage pupils in lively and stimulating debate. ‘Literacy is fun when we get the chance to move around the classroom and talk to others about what we are learning,’ was a typical pupil remark. Others commented ‘We like science now because we do lots of experiments’. Where teaching is most effective, pupils are encouraged to test and deepen their understanding with carefully crafted opportunities that promote high levels of discussion and independent thinking. Expectations are high, the pace of learning is

p.3

Quality of provision

brisk and as a result, pupils are engrossed in their work and make good progress.

p.3

Quality of provision

Nevertheless, whilst most teaching has a significant number of strengths, these are not present in all lessons. Opportunities for pupils to think and make decisions about how they learn for themselves or to think of different ways to tackle their work are not always encouraged. Pupils’ work is sometimes over directed and opportunities are missed for pupils to take responsibility for their learning. In addition, the questioning of higher attaining pupils by some teachers could be more sharply focused.

p.3

Quality of provision

The marking of pupils’ work is improving. There are some good examples of where pupils are given clear guidance on how to improve their work and reach the next level. The best examples are from teachers who have a clear understanding of how pupils learn effectively. However, the quality of marking is sometimes variable and is not consistent in some classes. The introduction of targets has given the pupils a sharper focus but teachers do not always refer to them well enough in lessons or when marking pupils’ work.

p.3

Quality of provision

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:

p.3

Quality of provision

 Improve the quality of teaching, and in particular ensure assessment information is used to plan learning which challenges all pupils – good  Improve the quality of marking so pupils know how well they are doing and how to improve – satisfactory

p.3

Leadership and management

The headteacher and senior leadership team have continued to work diligently in addressing the school’s weaknesses and in devising ways to improve further. The headteacher provides a steady steer for the school and has generated a strong momentum for improvement. She remains forthright in her desire to develop the skills of the leadership team further by empowering its members to make their own decisions and take even greater responsibility. She is passionate about developing pupils’ learning and has inspired staff and governors to make positive changes. As a result, morale is high, teamwork is strong and staff are forward thinking and reflective. They are well aware of their responsibilities, are increasingly accountable for their work and possess a good understanding of the school’s position.

p.4

Leadership and management

Governors are far more skilled in their role as improvement partners and have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and priorities. The approach of linking governors to each key issue has ensured that they provide good levels of challenge and are involved in evaluating how well the school is performing.

p.4

Leadership and management

There have been good improvements in the way that the school monitors its performance, particularly in the quality of teaching and learning. This is because the school has successfully introduced several strategies to inform teaching and learning, which in turn are leading to improvements in classroom practice. For example, lesson observations by senior staff focus routinely on the progress made by pupils in each class and teachers are provided with clear targets to improve their performance in all areas of their work. Feedback to staff is accurate, supportive and constructive. The outcomes of work scrutiny and the views of pupils are also taken into account. Strong support is provided by senior leaders in demonstrating good practice and in coaching and supporting less confident and experienced colleagues. As a consequence, teachers have been willing to take on new initiatives and have an increasing awareness of what constitutes effective learning.

p.4

Leadership and management

The school has made significant steps in its planning for improvement. Plans are well focused on raising achievement further and benefit from the outcomes of regular reviews and whole staff discussions. Teachers routinely use assessments to set and review targets for pupils to inform their learning. However, the school is aware that there are some inconsistencies in the way that individual targets are set which means that on occasions there is a variation in the challenge for some pupils, particularly the more able.

p.4

Leadership and management

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in May 2007:

p.4

Leadership and management

 Ensure leaders and managers effectively monitor all aspects of the school and particularly the quality of teaching and learning – good  Make planning for school improvement more rigorous, particularly in setting challenging learning targets for all classes – satisfactory

p.4

External support

The LA continues to assist the school well, through the work of the school improvement officer, specialist advisers and through the effective support of the Intensifying Support Programme consultant. As a result, there is clear agreement on the agenda for improvement and where further work is still required.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure greater consistency in the setting of individual learning targets and in the marking of pupils’ work.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion