Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    MONITORING VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedpositivetimelyeffectivelystrengthsskilledimprovingaccurate
Criticismweaknessesat riskbelowdeclinednot yetdecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Full report text

Context

Middlesbrough College was last inspected in November 2003. The college’s overall effectiveness was judged to be satisfactory. Curriculum areas were generally good or satisfactory. The two unsatisfactory areas of construction and provision for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities were reinspected in October 2005 and found to be satisfactory. Support for students and the college approach to inclusion were judged good in 2003. The college delivers programmes for approximately 5,000 (FTE) learners. There were 2,394 full-time 16-18 year old students in 2006/07 and over 7,000 part-time adults. The College offers a wide range of academic, vocational and professional programmes, as well as HE courses franchised from the University of Teeside, bespoke provision for employers and opportunities for 14-16 year olds, in partnership with local schools. It also delivers work based learning and Train to Gain programmes. The college is

p.1

Context

planning to relocate to a new building in 2008.

p.1

progress

College data show improvement in success rates in 2006/07 for adult learners at levels one and three. Both rates were considerably below national averages in the previous year but have now risen and are at or slightly above the respective averages when compared with national benchmarking data for 2005/06. Level 2 rates continue to be good for adult learners and have risen to around average for learners aged 16-18. Success rates for learners aged 16-18 on level 3 courses did not show improvement in 2006/07 and are still below the 2005/06 national average. The majority of these learners undertake BTEC National Diplomas and the college has put in place measures to bring about improvement which have not yet had time to impact fully. GCE AS results did show some improvement in 2006/07 and A level results continue to be satisfactory. Work based learning provision is satisfactory overall. In 2006/07 there was

p.1

progress

considerable fluctuation in results between subject areas. The overall success rate for framework only was below the national rate, the rate for framework and/or NVQ was slightly above and timely success rates remained above. In construction, engineering and business overall and timely success rates were well above the national rates. Success rates declined significantly in hairdressing in 2006/07. Hairdressing apprentices comprised a significant proportion of the work-based learning cohort in that year. The college identified the reasons for this decline and implemented a detailed and focused action plan, which is already showing positive impact.

p.2

progress

A new system is in place to ensure target setting is used more systematically and effectively across the college. All staff receive training and guidance to help them set targets for learners and review them regularly. The college is working towards putting in place aspirational as well as minimum grade targets. Staff confidence in the use of learner targets has increased, for example in breaking targets down into meaningful steps and using them to motivate learners. It is too early to evaluate the system in terms of improving the value added to learners’ previous attainment. Current data indicate value added is satisfactory.

p.2

progress

The college has radically altered its lesson observation scheme. The new system involves more observers, which means all teachers will be observed annually and a greater proportion of observations take place earlier in the year. The proportion of teaching graded good or better in 2006/07 was 68% and the college identified that there was too much teaching that was only satisfactory. Where the outcome is satisfactory with room for improvement, mentors work with staff to improve the lessons. Mentoring has been extended to staff teaching at the college but employed by an external agency, as well as staff employed directly by the college. The observation scheme has been extended to include work place assessment sessions. Staff are benefiting from opportunities to share good practice and from peer observation. There is a clearer understanding of what constitutes good teaching and learning across the college. Early indications

p.2

progress

are that the changes are having a positive impact on lessons observation grades in the 2007 autumn term.

p.3

progress

Key skills success rates improved significantly in 2006/07 and are now above the 2005/06 national averages at levels one and two. The college recognises continuing weaknesses in success rates at level three. Better integration of key skills in vocational areas has increased learner motivation to achieve the qualifications. There has been significant staff training in how to deliver key skills and each curriculum area has a key skills co-ordinator. In work based learning additional key skills workshops and revision sessions are provided prior to learners undertaking external tests and this has contributed to improved results in engineering, construction and business.

p.3

progress

The use of data has improved significantly. Each curriculum area is assigned a data controller to work with staff to ensure data is accurate before course reviews take place. At the reviews data are well used to analyse strengths and areas for improvement. As a result of better understanding of data, course co-ordinators are becoming increasingly skilled at determining specific actions to address weaknesses. Monthly departmental audits of data in work based learning enhance planning and intervention strategies for learners at risk of underperforming. This more systematic approach to the use of data has contributed to improved performance and target setting, for example, in engineering and construction.

p.3

progress

There is a more structured approach to performance management. As well as review meetings between heads of department and senior managers, course co-ordinators now have termly reviews against targets. The new teaching and learning policy links outcomes of observations to appraisal and there is an incentive scheme within the pay structure to improve teaching and learning. A number of these features are relatively new in the college and it is too early to evaluate fully their impact.

p.4

progress

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion