Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Aug 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Knight

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Knight

  • Postcode verified

    LN6 9BN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressenjoypositivehigh expectationsmake good progressclearengagingimproved
Criticismnot alwaysweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings585w+59
  • Leadership194w+79
  • What needs to improve82w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
844
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Mrs E Jones Headteacher St Michael’s CE Primary School School Lane Thorpe-on-the-Hill Lincoln LN6 9BN

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 2 July 2007 to look at work in mathematics. As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on pupils’ enjoyment and understanding of mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2007-08 survey inspection programme – mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Children join the school with broadly the expected levels of skills and understanding. During their time in Reception, they make good progress and reach standards that are higher than national expectations as they join Year 1. These children achieve well.  During Key Stage 1, good progress continues and by the end of Year 2, standards are well above average.  Progress is not as rapid in Key Stage 2 except in Year 6 where pupils are benefiting greatly from lively teaching. Past staffing instability has had an impact on the standards reached by pupils in Year 6, which are broadly average. Overall, achievement in Key Stage 2 is satisfactory. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk  Pupils enjoy lessons very much when they are lively, engaging and include real- world contexts. Behaviour is very good. Pupils seize the many opportunities

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teaching is good overall because of the consistency of approach throughout much of the school. The good progress throughout Reception and Key Stage 1 is founded on the extension of the philosophy and methodology of Reception into Key Stage 1. However, in some Key Stage 2 classes, activities remain too formal and abstract and this restricts the progress pupils can make.  Genuine real-life contexts are used well to generate interesting practical activities, for example, when pupils in Year 6 undertook a ‘Dragon’s Den’ activity to try to persuade governors to fund projects. This cross-curricular activity involved close teamwork and lots of mathematical skills as pupils sought to present their costs and predicted benefits to a panel of adults. Several of their schemes are now coming to fruition.  Teachers plan tasks well that engage and challenge pupils at the right level for them, enhancing their progress. Together with the positive relationships that

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

enable teachers’ discreet management of behaviour, these maintain a brisk pace to learning.  Pupils do not always know how well they are doing or how to improve because the marking of completed work and the setting and reviewing of individual targets vary in quality.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The mathematics curriculum offered by the school is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The school has improved the curriculum it offers in a number of ways. Methods and planning used in Reception have been extended through most of Key Stage 1 and, to a lesser extent, Key Stage 2 and are having a positive effect on pupils’ progress.  The curriculum includes a clear emphasis on active learning and making mental mathematics activities fun. To this end, the daily mental mathematics session has been separated from the main numeracy lesson to increase the ‘fun’ element and to increase the time that pupils are actively involved in their learning.  The school is increasing the number of activities based on real-life problems to be solved. These include the use of information and communication technology (ICT), practical and investigative methods.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management of mathematics are good.

p.2

Leadership and management

 You are currently co-ordinating mathematics. The improving picture stems from a shared understanding of the nature of mathematics and mathematical thought. This is resulting in a clear direction for the subject that focuses on practical and investigative methods, problem solving and the use of ICT.  The approach adopted throughout the school is becoming increasingly consistent. High expectations for all are being generated and checked on by accurate and incisive monitoring of the school’s work. Pupils in need of a boost are identified early by staff through the school’s accurate tracking systems.  The school has coped with considerable instability in staffing recently, which has particularly affected the standards reached in Year 6. You have focused on this and successfully ensured that these pupils are catching up.

p.2

Subject issue: pupils’ enjoyment and understanding of mathematics

Pupils were in agreement that they enjoy mathematics lessons. Lesson observations during the inspection support this, including lessons where they worked collaboratively and independently to complete their tasks. The main reasons for their enjoyment are lessons that are exciting and fast-moving and include genuine real- world contexts. These features also serve to generate real understanding of the underlying principles.

p.3

Inclusion

Inclusion in mathematics is good. Planning includes clear variations in tasks to ensure that all in the class are challenged at the right level; increasingly, this is supporting the progress of the most capable. The weaker pupils and those with learning difficulties and disabilities are supported effectively by well-deployed teaching assistants. The consistency of approach throughout the school is increasingly ensuring that all pupils have the same access to good quality teaching, rooted in problem solving and real-world contexts.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 the consistency of teaching so that all comes up to the quality of the best  the use of targets to develop further pupils’ independence  the quality of marking.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion