Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Padgett
- Postcode verified
WF4 4DH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers and teaching assistants keep detailed notes on children’s progress and make excellent use of digital cameras to record learning in lessons. p.2
- Teachers’ assessment of learning is outstanding. p.2
- Some teaching encourages children to explore phenomena very well, as when a group of Year 4/5 children thought that the colour of insulating material p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 702
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs F Swallow Headteacher Flockton CE (VC) First School Barnsley Road Flockton Wakefield WF4 4DH
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 18 June to look at work in science.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and informal discussions with pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and Standards
Achievement and standards in science are good.
p.1
Achievement and Standards
From a broadly average starting point, children make good progress and generally reach above average standards with a high proportion of children reaching the higher levels at Year 2 and 5. The presentation and recording of work are of a high standard. Children’s personal development is promoted well, largely because children undertake investigations frequently. The investigations promote good attitudes to science and provide opportunities for children to work successfully with others, often with children of different ability to their own. Every Child Matters outcomes are developed well. Science lessons promote children’s enjoyment, their knowledge of staying safe and being healthy. Their Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 F 0207 421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk future economic well-being is fostered effectively in these lessons by building fundamental thinking skills such as observation, deduction and prediction.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning in science is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
All teachers plan science lessons very thoroughly, making key learning objectives explicit and meeting National Curriculum requirements in full. Lessons are practical. Teachers are skilled questioners and listeners who involve children fully in lessons. Lesson time is used flexibly, to give children the opportunity to complete their investigations. Children’s behaviour is good, especially when they are planning and undertaking experiments. Teachers’ assessment of learning is outstanding. Teachers and teaching assistants keep detailed notes on children’s progress and make excellent use of digital cameras to record learning in lessons. Such assessments, annotated with children’s writing, build into records of achievement that are of high quality. Some teaching encourages children to explore phenomena very well, as when a group of Year 4/5 children thought that the colour of insulating material
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
might affect its efficiency as an insulator and were encouraged to find out. However, not all teaching promotes investigation so well, providing too much in the way of answers, rather than the questions that will encourage children to think scientifically.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
Despite not having been reviewed recently, the curriculum is broad, balanced and, because it is rooted in science investigation, exciting. The school is already engaged in determining the direction of science teaching in the school for the future, and is planning to improve the relevance of the science curriculum by relating it more to the locality. Teachers make good links with other subjects, such as design technology, music, ICT, and PSHE. Visits, visitors and an extra-curricular ‘Environment Club’ enhance the science curriculum.
p.2
Leadership and Management
Science is well led and managed by the co-ordinator. You provide clear strategic direction for science and oversee the rigorous tracking of children’s progress. Governors are involved in monitoring the work of the school, including reporting on science. The school has robust transition arrangements with the associated middle school. Professional development in science is undertaken through the local authority and through local networks of schools.
p.2
Inclusion
Despite the school’s small size, it educates and cares for the full range of children’s abilities and aptitudes, including children with statements of special educational need and those in need of social care. The school ensures children of all backgrounds have full access to science lessons and investigations. Open-ended investigations promote the interest and achievement of the higher attaining children in particular, but also that of individual children who are not high attaining in other, less practical subjects. Science investigations are used to promote children’s social development well, by encouraging children to work with others with different skills and aptitudes from their own.
p.3
Inclusion
With consistently good achievement, provision and leadership and management of science, there are no outstanding areas for improvement. However, we discussed developing science on the following lines:
p.3
Inclusion
encouraging teachers to ask more of the ‘why’, ‘what if’, ‘how’ questions that will encourage scientific thinking encourage the recording of science in even freer ways encourage greater relevance in the science curriculum when it is reviewed next year.
p.3
Inclusion
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.
p.3
Inclusion
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion