Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Sanderson
- Postcode verified
HA5 2DR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 774
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House T 08456 404040 33 Kingsway F 020 7421 6855 London enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk WC2B 6SE www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs Lack Headteacher Harlyn Primary School Tolcarne Drive Pinnor Middlesex HA5 2DR
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 June 2007 to look at work in science.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – science
The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Standards in science are average and achievement is satisfactory
p.1
Achievement and standards
Standards in science at the end of Year 2 are above average. Standards at the end of Year 6 have remained fairly static for the past five years. They were slightly below the national average in 2006. The school’s system for tracking pupil progress is robust and indicates that standards at the end of Year 6 are due to rise to national average levels this summer. The overall achievement of pupils is satisfactory. However, pupils make better progress in Key Stage 1 than they do in Key Stage 2. All groups of pupils make similar progress in science. The behaviour and attitudes to learning of pupils’ is good. They are keen to learn and willingly engage in activities provided for them during lessons.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning
The overall quality of teaching and learning in science is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
During the inspection, lessons observed ranged from outstanding to satisfactory. The school is developing strategies to share good practice between teachers. Teachers are enthusiastic about science and there were good relationships in all the lessons observed. Teachers share learning objectives and in the best lessons success criteria are made clear to pupils. In the good and better lessons there is a range of interesting activities that are pitched at the appropriate level for all pupils in the class. Effective questioning is used to develop and check pupils’ learning. Good opportunities are also provided for pupils to learn through planning and carrying out scientific investigations. In one lesson a good scientific investigation planning sheet was used to help pupils design a fair experiment. This approach is not consistently used by all teachers. Some lessons are too teacher directed and practical work involves
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
following instructions rather than allowing pupils to design experiments for themselves. The school has identified the need to develop the science subject knowledge of some teachers in Key Stage 2. Some effective training has already been provided to address this issue. Pupils are aware of their targets and know how well they are doing. Marking is helpful and gives pupils useful advice about how to improve their work.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The quality of the curriculum in science is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum
The scheme of work covers the requirements of the national curriculum. Curriculum planning ensures that there is progression in the teaching and learning of key ideas and skills in science. There is a strong emphasis on scientific investigation and problem solving in Key Stage 1. This emphasis is less clear in Key Stage 2. The school has developed the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in science well since the last inspection. A useful booklet has been produced informing teachers about programmes and websites that can be used to aid pupils’ learning in science.
p.2
Leadership and Management
Leadership and management in science are satisfactory.
p.2
Leadership and Management
The new science co-ordinator has carried out an audit of teaching and learning in Key Stage 2. This has identified some key areas for improvement related to improving teachers’ subject knowledge and developing the use of scientific investigations. The actions taken in response to this review are beginning to have an impact on pupils’ progress in Key Stage 2. Robust systems are in place to monitor pupil progress within science. The school has recently introduced a new electronic tracking system that will aid this process. The science co-ordinator has an accurate view of the strengths and areas in need of development in science. The science development plan addresses these issues, although the success criteria are not sufficiently specific or measurable
p.2
Inclusion
There are good relationships between all pupils and teachers. Pupils enjoy science. Pupils are provided with equal opportunities to learn and be fully engaged in activities. Analysis of data describing pupil progress shows that there is no significant difference in the progress made by different groups.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
further developing strategies to share the good and outstanding teaching and learning practice in the school with all teachers providing more opportunities for pupils in Key Stage 2 to learn through designing and carrying out their own investigations developing a more consistent approach to planning scientific investigations ensuring that the success criteria in the science development plan are more specific and measurable.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your Local Authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion