Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Jan 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Mitcheson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Mitcheson

  • Postcode verified

    NR19 1JB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
21
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
11 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Version 1 – September 2007 13 December 2007

p.1

Mrs Alison Kahn Headteacher Fred Nicholson School Westfield Road Dereham Norfolk NR19 1JB

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 12 December 2007, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please would you thank the chair of governors and the local authority for meeting with me. Since the previous inspection the school has opened Orchard House, an Autistic Spectrum Disorder resource base to meet the needs of five pupils and support other pupils in local schools. A new senior leadership team is in place and the school is preparing an application for specialist status.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 14 and 15 June 2006, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

 improve the quality of the boarding provision to meet National Care Standards and provide up to date domestic style accommodation  improve the quality of teaching to that of the best by more effective planning and individual pupils’ targets  raise standards and achievements at Key Stages 3 and 4 by more effectively evaluating and using information about how well pupils are making progress  provide appropriate information for governors to more rigorously monitor the school’s effectiveness. Cambridge Education Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01223 578500 Direct F 01223 578501 risp.inspections@camb-ed.com Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Satisfactory progress has been made in improving the quality of teaching and learning. Performance management arrangements include a programme of lesson monitoring and regular scrutiny of teachers’ lesson planning. The school’s own records show that whilst a small amount of ineffective teaching remains, a number of teachers have demonstrated significant improvement and most lessons are now satisfactory or better. Two joint observations carried out by HMI and senior teachers confirmed the rigour of the school’s monitoring procedures and agreed that lessons were satisfactory. Positive relations between staff and pupils help to support effective behaviour management. Pupils appreciate the praise they receive for making contributions in lessons or producing good work, and they generally enjoy their lessons. Teachers’ planning is now focused on what they want pupils to learn and includes probing questions to check pupils’ understanding, but this is not yet

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

consistent across all subjects. Not all planning includes different tasks to challenge the most able and at times, some pupils are not sufficiently stretched to work as hard as they can. Less progress has been made in ensuring targets for improvement expressed in pupils’ individual education plans (IEP’s) are fully addressed in all lessons. The setting of homework for those pupils who would benefit from additional study remains patchy.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Pupils continue to make satisfactory progress given their abilities and starting points when they enter the school. In Key Stages 3 and 4 in 2007, fewer pupils were entered for GCSE art or mathematics but the number of pupils making progress and attaining entry level awards improved. Pupils say that they feel they are making progress in their lessons and a scrutiny of pupils’ work sampled during lesson observations supports this. The school fell short of meeting all pupil targets contained in their IEPs, but this is mainly because some targets remain unrealistic and unattainable. A satisfactory start has been made in improving the use of data to track how well pupils are doing. The school has extended its use of Pivats and B- Squared assessment schemes to gather information on pupils’ progress and is working with the local authority to make further improvements to its assessment procedures so that it can compare its performance with other similar schools. This is

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

at an early stage of development and needs more time to become firmly established.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Governors remain very supportive of the school and the headteacher. They have a better range of information provided for them including improved self-evaluation and clear headteacher reports to help them monitor the school’s effectiveness. They are aware of the progress pupils make against their IEP targets but until the new assessment procedures become firmly embedded they are not yet able to thoroughly evaluate the attainment and progress of all pupils. Improvements have been made to the boarding accommodation and are recognised in the last CSCI inspection in January 2007. Pupils’ privacy has improved by providing curtains between beds and new furniture in the lounge provides a much more homely environment. Bathrooms have been refurbished to provide clean, up to date facilities. Some pupils have decorated their bedside areas with posters and their own belongings but this is not the case in all dormitories and some remain rather spartan. The stairwells still have

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

an institutional feel due to the lack of carpets. The local authority and governors make regular visits to monitor the quality of provision and also to act as independent listeners to pupils if they have concerns.

p.3

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion