Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kevin Hodge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kevin Hodge

  • Postcode verified

    B75 6BL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellvery highwell plannedstrengthssafe
Criticismconcernsconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings509w+55
  • Leadership106w+20
  • What needs to improve136w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
725
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Mr D Hill Headteacher Whitehouse Common Primary School Cotysmore Road Sutton Coldfield Birmingham B75 6BL

p.1

Development (ESD)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 27 February to look at work in ESD.

p.1

Development (ESD)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Development (ESD)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with governors, pupils, teachers and other staff, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and lesson observations covering Reception, Years 1, 2 and 5.

p.1

Development (ESD)

The overall effectiveness of ESD was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards and achievement in ESD are good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils have a good general awareness of environmental issues.  Pupils know about reusable materials and general ‘recycling’ principles.  Pupils know the value of healthy eating and the benefits of regular exercise.  Pupils’ standards of behaviour and abilities to cooperate with each other are very high.  Pupils have a good knowledge of specific environmental issues such as global warming and depletion of the ozone layer. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers make learning about ESD principles, such as recycling, fun and interesting.  Developing pupils’ understanding about other European countries is well taught, often by innovative use of computers and the Internet.  Outdoor learning is promoted well through a variety of activities such as monitoring environmental conditions in the school grounds or by studying micro organisms in science.  Pupils’ personal development and well being is fostered very well and is enhanced by pupils taking on extra responsibilities such as school council representatives.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 There are strengths in the way the school involves pupils in developing different areas of the school grounds such as the ‘secret garden’ and ‘willow tunnel’.  The curriculum makes good links to environmental work and ESD principles, particularly in science.  The school’s approach to promoting pupils’ personal, social and health education leads to their high standards of behaviour and maturity.  Well planned activities promote pupils’ sense of responsibility within the school.  Activities to encourage pupils to become aware of local environmental issues in the community are not systematically developed.  The use of the school grounds is planned for well in several subjects and is enhanced by extra-curricular activities such as the gardening club.

p.2

Leadership and management of ESD

Leadership and management of this area are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of ESD

 Although there is no member of staff directly responsible for coordinating ESD work, all staff take responsibility to include ESD principles in their own planning and subject development.  The school has promoted good use of ‘walking buses’ and is actively working towards developing safe cycle routes to school.  Views of parents and pupils are regularly sought and have resulted in changes to playground rules for example.  The governors and staff are mindful of ESD principles within the school, but there is no formal policy for their implementation in the whole range of school activities.

p.2

Inclusion

 The welfare and well being of pupils with learning difficulties are high profile and guided by the principles of ‘Every Child Matters’ guidance.  Vulnerable pupils have good levels of support. Special facilities such as ‘The Den’ provide a sanctuary for pupils to talk through their concerns.  Pupils are encouraged to take part in all areas of the curriculum and very good provision for sports and artistic activities broadens the range of skills they develop.

p.3

Areas for Improvement

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

p.3

Areas for Improvement

 consider developing a whole school policy for ESD to help bring together the different elements of good practice that exist  extend the good use of the school grounds by showcasing the use of solar or wind power  consider extending the pupils’ awareness and concern for community environmental issues  consider strengthening existing links with the partner school in Africa to extend pupils’ knowledge of a less economically developed country.

p.3

Areas for Improvement

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ESD in the school.

p.3

Areas for Improvement

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion