Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    TF9 2TE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivestrongmake good progressenjoywarmeffectiveenthusiastickeen
Criticismnot alwaysweaknesstoo oftennot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings487w+10
  • Leadership216w+57
  • What needs to improve102w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
788
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs D Bidgood Headteacher Hinstock Primary School School Bank Hinstock Market Drayton TF9 2TE

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 June 2007 to look at work in religious education (RE).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of RE the visit had a particular focus on the subject’s contribution to the promotion of community cohesion.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education

The overall effectiveness of RE was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Pupils’ achievement in RE is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils make satisfactory gains in their understanding of religion as they progress through the school and reach average standards.  Pupils in the Foundation Stage have a sense of self with some pupils talking about their local community. They understand what a church is used for and can use simple words to describe its significance for some people.  By the end of Key Stage 1 pupils are able to identify a range of religious practices knowing that some are common to more than one religion. They understand that there are different places of worship and can give simple explanations of how each building is used.  By the end of Key Stage 2 they are able to describe the key beliefs and teachings of specific religions, for example Buddhism, and make appropriate connections with features of Christianity, as shown in their knowledge and understanding of Buddhist and Christian wedding ceremonies.  Attitudes towards the subject are positive; pupils enjoy RE and

p.1

Achievement and standards

welcome opportunities to build confidence in a subject they value because ‘there are no right or wrong answers’. They respond well in discussions. They work co-operatively and listen well to each others’ point of view. RE makes a good contribution to the pupils’ personal development.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in RE is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Classroom management is good. Relationships are warm and trusting, pupils work harmoniously with sustained concentration.  Soundly planned lessons usually build upon the pupils’ previous learning. The best lessons make effective use of a range of strategies to consolidate and extend learning.  Teachers manage class discussion well, encouraging pupils to talk about their ideas affording them the opportunity to assess their understanding. Marking is a weakness; it is irregular and does not enable pupils to understand how to improve their work and develop their skills.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The school meets the statutory requirements of the agreed syllabus. The choice of faiths studied provides a suitable breadth of experience. Lessons are planned to interest the wide range of ages within each class.  An appropriate range of activities is planned but too often worksheets are used to record outcomes for pupils and this does not always extend the most able.  The curriculum is enriched through visits in the immediate locality and by visiting speakers.  There are sensible plans in place to make cross-curricular links, for example, with English.

p.2

Leadership and Management

The leadership and management of RE are satisfactory.  The subject co-ordinator is very enthusiastic about the development of RE throughout the school. Although formal monitoring of RE is not yet fully embedded, there is a keen awareness of what needs to be done to raise standards. An action plan is in place and information files to support teachers with planning are helpful.  While good links with the local authority have provided the school with valuable advice and support about assessing and tracking pupils’ progress, the systems are at an early stage of development. Currently pupils have to wait until the end of the year to find out about how they are doing in RE.

p.2

Community Cohesion

RE makes a positive contribution to the promotion of community cohesion. Pupils show a keen interest in learning about religion and understand about a diversity of groups, faiths and traditions. They are given appropriate opportunities to relate their study of religion to their own experience and the local community through, for example, visits by local church groups and visits. Pupils talked with enthusiasm about the recent visit from a Buddhist monk and were eager to show what they had learned. The school has developed a portfolio of evidence to demonstrate how it works to promote community cohesion through all subjects.

p.3

Inclusion

There is a strong focus on inclusion in the school and all pupils take advantage of what the RE curriculum can offer. Teaching assistants support their pupils well and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make good progress as a result. Tasks are not always differentiated enough to challenge the higher attaining pupils.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 making more use of the level descriptors to plan work that extends prior knowledge and skills, especially for the more able pupils  developing more structured assessments to track pupils’ progress more effectively  formalising the arrangements for monitoring the quality of provision in RE.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and SACRE and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion