Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony O’Malley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony O’Malley

  • Postcode verified

    TF10 7EA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progresseffectivepositiveenjoystrengthsstronggood progressskilfully
Criticismweaknessesat risklimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings515w+70
  • Leadership218w+69
  • What needs to improve98w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
807
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Mr Ashton Headteacher Newport Church of England Voluntary Controlled Junior School Avenue Road Newport Shropshire TF10 7EA

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 May 2007 to look at work in the Primary National Strategies.

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the strategies, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of Assessment for Learning (AfL).

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of five lessons.

p.1

and Secondary National Strategies

The overall effectiveness of the national strategies is judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Pupils’ achievement in English is good. The impact of AfL on pupils’ achievement and personal development is also good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards are significantly above average in English and pupils’ progress is good. Progress has been in the top 40% nationally in each of the previous three years. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Vulnerable groups of pupils perform well. Pupils who enter the school with below average ability in reading and writing receive effective support and make good progress.  In the few lessons where teachers do not fully apply the principles of AfL, progress is slower.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good. They are keen to learn. They respond well to opportunities to work collaboratively.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of English

The quality of teaching and learning in English is good. The impact of AfL on teaching and learning is also good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

 Pupils make good progress in most lessons because learning is purposeful and activities are skilfully matched to meet their needs.  Assessment and monitoring procedures, based on national strategy principles, have a positive impact on the quality of teaching and learning in English.  Pupils speak positively about the guidance provided by teachers.  Progress is slower when teachers consistently seek answers from a limited number of pupils who raise their hands.  Pupils are unsure how their individual targets will help them improve.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The English curriculum is good as is the impact of AfL on the curriculum.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 Pupils enjoy English. Whole class reading and writing narratives were particularly popular.  Most marking helps pupils to improve their work and there are good examples of self assessment.  English skills and understanding are well integrated into other subjects across the curriculum.  Sometimes too much time is spent on punctuation exercises and this limits time for other essential work.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management in English are good. The effectiveness of the leadership and management of AfL is also good.

p.2

Leadership and management

 The English subject leader has a good understanding of the subject’s strengths and weaknesses. With strong support from the senior leadership team, she ensures that AfL is developed to raise achievement and improve the quality of teaching.  Assessment data is analysed effectively to monitor trends in performance. The school has good plans to use end of term assessments to help identify strengths and areas for development in teaching and the curriculum.  The senior leadership team have promoted AfL as central to their plans for raising achievement. Since the introduction of the strategies they have carefully selected aspects that support and develop this vision.  Senior leaders conduct rigorous audits of AfL to monitor and evaluate the implementation of AfL and to promote consistency.

p.2

Assessment for Learning

 Assessment for learning has contributed successfully to the raising of achievement. The impact of AfL on the quality of teaching and learning leads to pupils’ good progress.  Throughout the school, conditions for learning are based on high learning expectations.  The commitment to AfL has had a positive impact on the pupils’ personal development. The pupils are confident, enjoy working collaboratively and are ready to take greater responsibility for their learning.

p.3

Inclusion

 All groups achieve well. The needs of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are well supported and barriers to progress removed.  The school provides effective support for pupils at risk of underachievement for emotional or behavioural reasons.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring that in English pupils have a greater awareness of their individual targets and how they can help them improve their work  improving questioning strategies so that they encourage pupils to think and enable teachers to assess learning more accurately.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English and AfL in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion