Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Weston

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Weston

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelyrapid progresswell plannedclearenthusiasticwell supportedkeen
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateinsufficientmissedlimitednot accuratenot precisenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionFindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings707w+27
  • Leadership163w−71
  • What needs to improve159w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
998
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23 May 2007 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a focus on the emphasis placed on the global dimension of geography.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of six lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards and achievement are satisfactory overall.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards on entry are broadly average although pupils come into Year 3 having undertaken a range of different geographical experiences in their feeder infant schools.  By the end of Key Stage 2, most pupils reach standards that are in line with national expectations making steady gains in their learning. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Mrs J Brown Headteacher Emerson Valley School Hodder Lane Emerson Valley Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK4 2JR  Pupils in Years 3 and 4 have a satisfactory knowledge of geographical processes through their study of their immediate locality and the weather. Their geographical skills are developed satisfactorily through the study of plans and maps. Field work around Furzton Lake also supports this work appropriately.  In Years 5 and 6, pupils continue to make satisfactory progress in their skills, knowledge and understanding by comparing and contrasting Milton Keynes with Llandudno and Nairobi and their study of rivers. Pupils in Year 6 have a sound understanding of geographical processes at work through their study of mountain regions.  Throughout the school opportunities are missed to build on pupils’ previously developed skills. This is because the school does not have an accurate picture of what skills have been acquired.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Overall, pupils’ behaviour is good and they respond well to clear classroom expectations of good behaviour. Adults enjoy good relationships with pupils. Pupils generally are keen and enthusiastic about their work.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching was satisfactory with some good features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Work is well planned. All teachers make learning objectives clear to pupils and these are used well to recap on their learning during lessons. This helps pupils to consolidate new knowledge.  In good observed lessons, resources were carefully selected to increase interest and add value to the session. These lessons had good pace, carefully building on previous learning to extend pupils’ thinking.  In lessons that are satisfactory rather than good, introductions tended to be over long and over- dominated by the teacher. Questioning is occasionally not precise or focused enough.  Although Information and Communication Technology is generally used well, pupils sometimes are not critical or selective enough of the information they find. As a result, some become too reliant on the internet to provide solutions discouraging them from thinking for themselves.  A range of assessment for learning techniques was observed. When

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

used well, these effectively promote interest, collaboration and participation.  Although all lessons observed were appropriately differentiated, scrutiny of books shows that more able pupils require less structure and greater challenge in order to make more rapid progress.  Although pupils’ work is marked regularly, guidance is not always sufficiently clear about what pupils need to do next to improve their geographical skills, knowledge and understanding.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.3

Quality of curriculum

 The curriculum is in the main appropriate and meets statutory requirements. However it is imbalanced, particularly in Years 5 and 6. The school is aware that the curriculum map for geography is in need of review.  Some useful and interesting cross-curricular work has been undertaken particularly in a Year 4 history study of the Romans as well as a number of theme days such as the ‘India Day’ and ‘Weather Day’. However, these sessions only provide limited opportunities to develop geographical thinking and understanding.  Opportunities are not always taken to use field work and real examples within the immediate locality to motivate and inspire pupils. Where field work has been undertaken, as in Years 3 and 5 to Furzton Lake, pupils enjoy these visits and this helps support their learning.

p.3

Leadership and management

Leadership and management of geography are satisfactory.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The current position in geography is very similar to that found at the time of the last inspection. The subject leader has undertaken some monitoring and evaluation of teachers’ planning and pupils’ work.  The school does not have an accurate picture of the themes studied in the main feeder infant schools.  The subject leader has produced an annual development plan which identifies appropriate areas for improvement. This provides a suitable starting point for future development.  Good proposals are in place for the subject leader to develop the concept of sustainable development in collaboration with other colleagues.

p.3

Subject issue

Pupils’ learning about the global dimension is inadequate.

p.3

Subject issue

 There is insufficient emphasis on environmental change and sustainable development. Issues such as recycling, climate change and the effects of tourism on mountain regions have not been explored in sufficient detail. Pupils therefore do not have an adequate knowledge of global issues or fully understand their complexity.

p.3

Inclusion

The provision for inclusion is satisfactory overall.

p.4

Inclusion

 In lessons seen work was matched to the needs of pupils, with boys and girls having equal access.  Teachers provide appropriate support and challenge which helps pupils make at least satisfactory progress. Pupils with learning difficulties are generally well supported by learning support assistants.  Where work is adapted, it is mainly to meet the needs of those pupils with learning difficulties. More able pupils require greater challenge in some of the tasks set.  Pupils from minority ethnic groups make satisfactory progress.

p.4

Areas for improvement

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

p.4

Areas for improvement

 establish links with the two main feeder infant schools to increase the school’s understanding of what has been taught previously and the geographical knowledge and skills that pupils bring with them on entry  develop the curriculum further to increase pupils’ knowledge and understanding of environmental change and sustainable development  establish a map which effectively tracks pupils’ progress and which can be used by teachers to inform their planning to improve achievement, particularly for the most able  review the geography curriculum map to ensure appropriate and balanced coverage  ensure that monitoring and evaluation takes into account the views of pupils and includes some observations of lessons.

p.4

Areas for improvement

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion