Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

La Petite Ecole Francaise

Inspected 8 Nov 2007 · published 30 Nov 2007 · URN 100545

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Nov 2007

  • Name on report verified

    La Petite Ecole Française

  • URN verified

    100545

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery welleffectivelygood progresspositivevery effectiveeffectivehigh-quality
Criticisminsufficientnot clearbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1175w+80
  • What needs to improve195w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,362
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

DCSF Registration Number 207/6387 Unique Reference Number 100545 Inspection number 316940 Inspection dates 7-8 November 2007 Reporting inspector Marianick Ellender-Gelé HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 162A of the Education Act 2002 (as amended by schedule 8 of the Education Act 2005).

p.1

Independent French Nursery School

Inspection report This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.1

Independent French Nursery School

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Purpose and scope of the inspection

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under section 162A of the Education Act 2002, as amended by schedule 8 of the Education Act 2005, in order to advise the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.3

Information about the school

The "Petite Ecole Française" is a nursery school situated in Notting Hill in the borough of Kensington and Chelsea. It was established in 1983 to serve the French speaking community in London. The school is part of the French national education system and reflects its phylosophy, objectives and curriculum programmes. The great majority of children are bilingual (French and English) and transfer to the French Lycée (Lycée Français Charles de Gaulle) or the Ecole Primaire Jacques Prévert. A small number of children use a third language at home and come from a range of countries including Morroco, Algeria, Lebanon, Iran and Africa. The school’s main aim is to ensure that each child develops into a confident and happy pupil able to thrive in either a French or English educational environment. Although a relaxed family atmosphere prevails, there is a strong expectation that children at this school will achieve their academic potential. This nursery is part of a consortium of French

p.3

Information about the school

London schools. The headteacher has close professional links with the French authorities and colleagues from similar schools in London.

p.3

Evaluation of the school

The quality of education provided by the school is good. The curriculum allows children to explore new concepts and learn effectively. It is planned well to include all creative areas of learning and to ensure thorough acquisition of language and numerical skills. The development of oracy is particularly excellent. Teaching is good and preparation for transfer to the primary school is meticulous. Children receive very effective care and individual support. This, combined with their eagerness to discover the world around them, leads to good progress. The already high level of knowledge that children bring to the school, in particular their linguistic capability and the good range of their vocabulary, added to a broad programme of personal, social and health education provide for good social, moral, spiritual and cultural development. The provision for the welfare, health and safety of all children is very

p.3

Evaluation of the school

good. The school complies with nearly all of the regulations.

p.3

Quality of education

The quality of the curriculum is good. The areas of learning, stipulated by the French programmes of study, are covered well and time allocated is balanced to ensure good progress in all skills. There is, however, insufficient use of information and communication technology (ICT) to support teaching and learning. Provision for the development of oracy and opportunities to develop the artistic aspects of learning through the “Projet d’école” are notable strengths. The curriculum prepares children very well for the next steps in their education and for life in a multi-lingual and multi- cultural society. The provision for teaching children about the importance of adopting a healthy lifestyle and keeping safe is good. The school makes good use of local amenities, such as the local Memorial Garden and sports facilities. The extra- curricular programme is effective and enhances subjects well, for example in music,

p.3

Quality of education

Children learn effectively because teaching is good. Teaching shows good specialist knowledge and thorough preparation of classroom activities. All classroom staff are bilingual. Their expertise and pedagogical approach are matched well to the needs of this nursery. English staff lead high-quality workshops which enable all children to practise the English language in real contexts. Teachers and classroom assistants work very well together and are highly committed to the welfare and academic progress of their class. Teaching has a positive impact on children’s learning thanks to small group work and positive use of praise. There is, however, room for improvement to ensure that activities match more closely the already high levels of knowledge that some able children bring to the class. Relationships are very good, helping children’s motivation and diligence. Assessment is based on the French system which includes on-going reviews and formal evaluations twice per year. This

p.4

Quality of education

is managed well and informs parents of progress made in all skills and areas of learning. The tracking of each child’s development and progress is thorough with special educational needs spotted in a timely manner to ensure well-targeted specialist support.

p.4

Quality of education

Children start school with knowledge and skills that are above those typical of three- year-olds. Consequently, children who are very able require more consideration when lessons are planned to ensure progression, develop their independence and fulfil their potential. Over time, children’s mathematical, social and physical skills develop well and older children demonstrate increased confidence. If they encounter difficulties, teachers provide good academic and welfare support. The team and family approach of the teaching, along with small group work and workshops, encourage progress and commitment. Children try hard, show respect and eagerness to do well. Progress in listening and speaking skills is excellent. There are often more girls than boys in teaching groups but the teaching is skilful enough to ensure that all children regardless of gender make the progress they deserve.

p.4

Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of the pupils

Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Children are very friendly and welcoming of visitors showing great personal inquisitiveness and joy for learning. Throughout the school, behaviour is very good. Children attend regularly, and approach lessons with good levels of interest and concentration. They respond well to praise and cooperate well with their teachers. Meals are enjoyable social occasions, taken with staff, and contribute to their social development. The specific programmes, called “Vivre Ensemble” for younger children and the Knowledge and Understanding of the world for older ones, contribute effectively to children’s spiritual and moral development, although there are comparatively few opportunities for them to reflect on their ideas and actions. Children make a good contribution to their own community and take responsibility in class. A relevant programme of visits and visitors encourages children’s awareness of British

p.4

Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of the pupils

institutions such as the monarchy. Cultural development is very good and there is a high degree of racial harmony. From their earliest days in the school children are immersed in the French and English language. By the time they leave, all are bi- lingual. They have good opportunities to learn about the many cultures represented at the school.

p.5

Welfare, health and safety of the pupils

The overall welfare, health and safety of pupils are good. Children know how to keep safe. They are very well cared for. The school has effective policies and practices in place and the headteacher ensures that all are updated as required. Teachers are diligent about the safety of all children and risk assessments are carefully made. The school is in the process of completing an assessment under the Disability Discrimination Act, although it is currently seeking alternative accommodation and will therefore revise its plans as required. Children with temporary mobility issues are provided for effectively.

p.5

Suitability of the proprietor and staff

Checks with the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) for the suitability of staff to work with children are carried out for all staff employed in the school and all long serving members of staff have been subject to the appropriate checks. Procedures for appointing staff are appropriate and rightly involve the taking up of professional references and checking qualifications.

p.5

School’s premises and accommodation

Premises and accommodation are of a good standard. The school is housed in a beautiful Victorian building and these home surroundings make a very positive contribution to children’s learning and personal development. Although the rooms and the outdoor play area are small, the school makes good use of its accommodation and takes pupils to local facilities such as parks and playgrounds as often as possible.

p.5

Provision of information for parents, carers and others

The school sends out appropriate materials to inform parents and prospective parents of the school’s objectives and policies. Reports to parents match the French system of two end-of-term evaluations. However some information in the documentation to parents is not clear enough as itemised in the section below.

p.5

Procedures for handling complaints

The procedures for handling complaints comply with the regulations.

p.6

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school meets all of the Education (Independent School Standards) (England) Regulations 2003 as amended January 2005, with the exception of those listed below.

p.6

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school does not meet all requirements in respect of the provision of information for parents, carers and others (standard 6) and must:

p.6

Compliance with regulatory requirements

 provide the name of the headteacher in the welcome pack to parents or other documentation (paragraph 6(2)(a))  provide the full name of the proprietor and address for correspondence during both term time and holidays and a telephone number or numbers on which he may be contacted (paragraph 6(2)(b))  ensure that parents are aware that they can request the number of complaints registered under the formal procedure during the preceding school year (paragraph 6(2)(j))  Make clear to parents that they can request the number of staff employed at the school, including temporary staff, and a summary of their qualifications (paragraph 6(2)(k)).

p.6

What the school could do to improve further

While not required by the regulations, the school might wish to consider the following points for development:

p.6

What the school could do to improve further

 make better use of ICT to support teaching and learning  plan lessons more rigorously so that activities meet the needs of all more able children.

p.6

School details

Name of school La Petite Ecole Française DCSF number 207/6387 Unique reference number 100545 Type of school French nursery Status Independent Date school opened 1983 Age range of pupils 3-5 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll (full-time pupils) Boys: 29 Girls: 31 Total: 60 Annual fees (day pupils) £ 6,600 Address of school 90 Oxford Gardens London W10 5UW Telephone number 0208960 1278 Email address lapetiteecolefrancaise@gmail.com Headteacher Ms Anne Stones Proprietor Sir David Henderson-Stewart Reporting inspector Marianick Ellender-Gelé HMI Dates of inspection 7-8 November 2007

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion