Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Lyons

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Lyons

  • Postcode verified

    IP32 6RH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings32w0
  • What needs to improve122w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
151
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 70%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Paul Rossi Headteacher St Benedict’s Catholic School Beetons Way Bury St Edmunds Suffolk IP32 6RH

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23 May to look at work in business education. As the school does not provide any examination courses in business at Key Stage 4, the visit focussed on the development of economic and business understanding and personal finance education for all students.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of parts of ten lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Business education

The overall effectiveness of the provision for economic and business understanding and personal finance education was judged to be good.

p.1

Strengths in provision

 The leadership and management of this aspect of the curriculum are good. There is enthusiastic leadership of enterprise and the delivery of economic and business understanding is managed well.  Students are prepared well for work experience. This is used well when they return to school, making the activity productive and valuable.  There has been good evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of this area of the curriculum, leading to change and improved provision. Student surveys, along with classroom observation, have been used effectively to monitor and improve provision.  There is well planned curriculum coverage of the aspects of economic and business understanding found in the citizenship programme of study.  Teaching has improved through the school’s monitoring systems and some element of subject training for tutors. Most Year 11 students enjoy their lessons. However, the quality of teaching and learning is

p.1

Strengths in provision

variable. The experience and progress of students is too dependant on the commitment to the subject of their form tutor.  The recent Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (CAFOD) project provides an excellent example of using enterprise activity as a vehicle for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness and understanding.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the need to:

 improve assessment so that students are encouraged to develop a wider range of skills that go beyond factual recall  bring the quality of teaching in personal, social and health education and citizenship education up to that found more generally in the school  further develop financial understanding to explore areas such as the risks of cumulative interest when using credit cards.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the need to:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business education in the school.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included the need to:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/Local Learning and Skills Council and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion