Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Harrett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Harrett

  • Postcode verified

    TF10 8JQ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseenjoyconsistentlyimprovedeffectiveclearlyambitiousmake good progressclear
Criticismnot consistentlynot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings487w+64
  • Leadership259w+84
  • What needs to improve107w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
822
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs Hawkins Headteacher St Peter’s C of E Primary School Stackyard Lane Edgmond Newport, Shropshire TF10 8JQ

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 21 May 2007 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject the visit had a particular focus on our current survey theme: provision for poetry. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons. The overall effectiveness of English was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards throughout the school are well above average in English and the achievement of the pupils is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 At Key Stage 1, standards in reading and writing fell in the national tests in 2004 and 2005 but rose in 2006 and were well above average. Standards observed during the visit were well above average in reading, writing and in speaking and listening.  At Key Stage 2, standards dipped in 2005 but rose in 2006. Standards have been consistently above average over time and were well above average in 2006. The pupils made satisfactory progress. Standards and achievement have improved this year and the progress made by pupils in Key Stage 2 is now good.  Pupils speak enthusiastically about their English lessons. They behave well, enjoy their learning and take pride in the presentation and quality of their written work.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of English

Teaching and learning in English are good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

 The best lessons are brisk and purposeful, with clear learning objectives which are well understood by the pupils.  In these lessons, the teachers’ questioning is challenging. It probes the pupils’ understanding, making them think clearly and evaluate their answers carefully.  Activities are appropriately planned in a variety of whole class, group and paired settings. The pupils respond well to these arrangements.  The school is developing new assessment arrangements which enable teachers to track the progress made by the pupils accurately. This is improving their rate of achievement. However, not all pupils are aware of their targets or how to meet them.  Although marking is detailed and shows the pupils what they have done well, it does not consistently tell them what their next steps to improve their work should be.  Lesson plans describe the activities that the pupils will engage in clearly, but they do not always focus on the learning outcomes for the

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

pupils or give the pupils sufficient opportunities to review their learning together.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The school is developing the curriculum to provide more opportunities for literacy in a range of subjects and activities.  Creative approaches across the curriculum provide an interesting and appropriate connection between subjects.  The curriculum promotes progression in reading, writing, speaking and listening in a way which emphasises the relationships between them.  A good range of trips and visitors to the school enhances the curriculum.  Pupils respond well to the curriculum and clearly enjoy their learning.

p.2

Leadership and management of English

The quality of the leadership and management of English is good.

p.3

Leadership and management of English

 A school focus on developing the capacity of subject leaders has resulted in clear improvements which have had a positive impact in the last two years on standards and achievement.  Leadership and management are ambitious, determined and committed to raising standards.  You and the subject leader for English have an accurate understanding of the strengths and areas for development in the subject. You plan strategically and effectively to promote improvement.  Monitoring is detailed and regular and informs planning well.  The improved use of assessment data has raised standards and achievement.

p.3

Provision for poetry

 Pupils enjoy poetry and can speak enthusiastically about it.  They enjoy writing poetry and do so successfully. Pupils take pride in the class anthologies which they produce.  Pupils are given examples of different styles of poetry to use as models for their own writing. They enjoy discussing the quality of their poetry in class.  Older pupils are able to discuss poems critically in speech and writing, using apt vocabulary.  Poetry is taught in a variety of ways and for a range of purposes. It is taught as an enjoyable and important part of the English curriculum and features in other subjects such as in science topics. Some good practice in the teaching of poetry was observed during the visit.  The pupils experience an appropriate range of poetry during their time in school, but the choice of poetry is largely decided by individual teachers without an overall plan.

p.3

Inclusion

 All groups of pupils make at least satisfactory progress and some make good progress.  The curriculum is inclusive and all groups of pupils are well supported in their learning.  Teaching assistants play an active and effective role in lessons.  Effective assessment ensures that pupils are grouped well in lessons.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 making sure that marking consistently shows the pupils what their next steps should be to improve their work  ensuring that the pupils know their individual targets, what they should do to achieve them and how they relate to the overall quality of their work.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and made available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion