Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Hancock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Hancock

  • Postcode verified

    NE29 9QL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressexcellentsuccessfullyaccuratestrongeffectivelyenjoyconsistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings447w+85
  • Leadership47w+77
  • What needs to improve66w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
549
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Leadership 7%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Mrs S Watts Acting Headteacher Preston Grange Primary School Chiltern Road Preston Grange North Shields Tyne and Wear NE29 9QL

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 June 2007 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards are above average and pupil achievement in D&T is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils start in Year 1 with average standards and make good progress during their time at the school. Standards are above average by the time they leave at the end of Year 6.  Pupils know how to use tools and equipment effectively to make good quality models and prototypes such as fairgrounds, Tudor houses, and slippers. Design skills, for example researching and evaluating, are well developed and pupils quickly learn how to plan for making. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk  Computers are successfully used from an early age to help when designing. Pupils talk enthusiastically about their work in D&T and thoroughly enjoy the subject. They rightly say ‘it is a lot harder than you think to design and make something that looks good and works well’.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 Work seen in lessons together with displays and records of work in classrooms confirm teaching and learning are consistently good across the school. Designing is well taught and developed in all year groups.  Pupils are provided with good individual subject support and guidance which helps them learn more quickly to master technical language and feel confident when making products. The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) units of work have strengthened learning and made levels of challenge more progressive. The school recognises challenging the most capable pupils is an area to improve to raise achievement in the subject further. Resources are well chosen to make maximum use of available tools and practical equipment.  Assessment procedures evaluate D&T capability at the end of each project. Teachers are rightly moderating judgements to make assessment practice more accurate. Summary feedback on individual

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

performance at the end of each key stage and year is an area for development the school is working on.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The QCA schemes for D&T have been successfully adapted to meet the needs and interests of pupils. The systematic coverage of designing and the more progressive use of practical equipment help pupils to make good progress and achieve well.  The school is taking the right action to explore differentiated activities in D&T which meet the needs of the gifted and talented.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of D&T are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

 Your strong leadership is providing clear direction and driving improvement. The school has an excellent understanding of the nature and purpose of D&T. Monitoring and rigorous self-evaluation are providing an accurate picture of how well the subject is doing.

p.2

Inclusion

Support in D&T for pupils with learning difficulties is good and different groups of pupils are involved in every aspect of the subject. Pupils learn practical skills safely at an early age.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 incorporating more challenging work for the most capable pupils  moderating judgements to make assessment practice more accurate.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion