Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Hancock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Hancock

  • Postcode verified

    NE65 7PG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelymake good progressskilfullypositivelyenthusiasticconfidentlyeffectiveimproved
Criticismlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings402w+80
  • Leadership64w+50
  • What needs to improve85w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
539
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

Mrs D Butler Headteacher Rothbury First School Rothbury Morpeth Northumberland NE65 7PG

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on Tuesday 22 May 2007 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is good and standards in D&T are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils make good progress, many from a lower starting point than normally found, and standards are satisfactory overall. In the reception class, they use construction kits skilfully to design and make models of fire engines, rockets and roundabouts. Design skills are well applied for example when planning and evaluating a farmyard. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk  Pupils use equipment, tools and materials well by the end of Year 2. They creatively design good quality products such as glove puppets and talk with significant pride about their work.  By the time they leave school at the end of Year 4, pupils rigorously evaluate products they have designed and made such as Greek tragedy masks. They speak positively about the subject and are enthusiastic about the challenges the subject presents. Pupils are particularly realistic about what they imagine ideas to look like in the

p.1

Achievement and standards

planning stages and the problems faced when making a real product.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 Teaching is well balanced between pupils finding out for themselves and being taught D&T knowledge and skills. Good teaching is making sure pupils are able to understand what they need to do when designing and making products.  Teachers’ subject knowledge is secure and pupils talk confidently about the use of specific tools and techniques. Pupils’ knowledge of systems and control is less well embedded.  The school acknowledges assessment practice is the next area for development in D&T and is planning to help pupils know more fully how well they are doing and guide learning more effectively.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The curriculum is meeting the needs and interest of learners well. An effective curriculum structure uses QCA units in conjunction with topic work. This ensures activities keep pupils interested and using a variety of components and materials.  The rate of progress from year to year has improved as a result of using the QCA units to guide the work. Subject knowledge could be further extended by increasing opportunities to learn in more depth about mechanisms and electronic control systems.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of D&T are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

 The school’s leadership and management capacity to ensure D&T can move forward are good. As a result, planning and schemes of work are improving.  The school accurately evaluates the subject strengths and areas for development. It is realistic about what can be achieved in a small three teacher first school alongside other priorities for development.

p.2

Inclusion

Provision in D&T for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities is good. All pupils including boys and girls are equally involved in the subject.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 assessment systems to help pupils know more fully how well they are doing and guide learning more effectively  further extending subject knowledge by increasing opportunities to learn in more depth about mechanisms and electronic control systems.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion