Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Paul Hancock
- Postcode verified
NE22 7JQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school’s management capacity to ensure D&T can thrive is excellent. p.2
- Pupils are enthusiastic and positive about D&T. p.1
- Teachers’ subject knowledge is consistently good and they are enthusiastic in their support for the subject. p.2
- Teachers recognise the value of good quality materials and use them very well. p.2
- The quality of the curriculum is good with some outstanding features. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“The school’s management capacity to ensure D&T can thrive is excellent.” p.2SEND & inclusion2
“The contribution which D&T makes to inclusion is good.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 567
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Pauline Mulholland Headteacher Bedlington Station First School School Road Bedlington NE22 7JQ
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on Friday 18 May to look at work in design and technology (D&T).
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.
p.1
Design and Technology
The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good and confirms your self evaluation.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards in D&T are good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils start at the school with skills and capabilities which are well below average. In the Foundation Stage, many pupils find it difficult initially to use basic equipment such as pencils and scissors when engaged in practical work. They make good progress, however. They start at Key Stage 1 with below average standards. They achieve well and again make good progress so that by the end of year 4, standards are average. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Pupils demonstrate a secure knowledge and understanding of D&T. They use equipment and materials effectively to design and make a wide range of products. As a result, their capabilities in the subject are well developed. They understand how to routinely evaluate and revise designs which are both creative and practical. Pupils are enthusiastic and positive about D&T. They enjoy the subject, behave well in D&T lessons, and
p.1
Achievement and standards
work safely when using practical equipment.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning in D&T is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Teachers’ subject knowledge is consistently good and they are enthusiastic in their support for the subject. The teaching of design is lively and creative. Lesson planning is thorough and presents a level of challenge which works well according to need and ability. Work is differentiated effectively and the more capable are given increasingly complex tasks. There is room to refine the already good pace of lessons with more practical work. Teachers recognise the value of good quality materials and use them very well. Assessment practice is good and makes sure capability is recorded against National Curriculum levels.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is good with some outstanding features.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The time allocated for D&T is appropriate and there is a wide range of activities to hold pupils’ interest. They use a good variety of components and materials when designing and making. Subject knowledge is good and could be further extended by increasing opportunities to learn in more depth, for example about complex mechanisms and the use of more advanced tools and equipment. The coverage of key design skills such as routine evaluation when making and the generation of ideas is an outstanding feature. Another outstanding feature is the work undertaken with visiting artists and crafts specialists.
p.2
Leadership and management
Leadership and management of D&T are good.
p.2
Leadership and management
The quality of leadership and the way the subject is consistently planned, organised, managed and evaluated is good at all levels. The performance of the subject is closely monitored and school evaluations are accurate. Self evaluation is well evidenced through high quality records which include photographs and examples of pupils work. The school’s management capacity to ensure D&T can thrive is excellent.
p.2
Inclusion
The contribution which D&T makes to inclusion is good.
p.3
Inclusion
Boys and girls are doing equally as well. The school is fully inclusive and support for pupils with learning difficulties in D&T is good.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
refining the already good pace of lessons with more practical work extending opportunities to learn in more depth at an earlier age.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion