Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Toft

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Toft

  • Postcode verified

    CH42 6RT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentexceptionallyvery wellsuccessfullyenthusiasticthriveoutstandinghigh quality
Criticismnot outstandingnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings687w+85
  • Leadership108w+86
  • What needs to improve68w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
835
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Mrs V Maher Headteacher Bedford Drive Primary School Bedford Drive Rock Ferry Birkenhead Merseyside CH42 6RT

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff during my visit on 6 June 2007 to look at the work in design and technology.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Design and Technology

The provision for design and technology (D&T) is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are very good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils develop D&T capability to high levels across almost the full spectrum of this complex subject.  Given the below average attainment of pupils on entry to the school, this represents excellent progress and achievement.  Pupils get off to a good start in the Foundation Stage where they have a rich variety of practical and investigative experiences. These are mainly related to “Knowledge and understanding of the world”. They carry out tasks with precision, Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 F 0207 421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk concentration and imagination and this provides a solid foundation for subsequent learning in D&T.  In Key Stage 1, pupils make excellent progress as they work through a wide range of “design and make” projects. These are well grounded in the units of work developed by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) which teachers

p.1

Achievement and standards

have carefully adapted to help pupils see the links between various subjects.  Pupils develop very good designing, making and evaluating skills and they know clearly how well their products carry out their intended functions. They work competently with compliant materials, construction kits, fabrics and food.  Pupils continue with this excellent progress through Key Stage 2. The school’s assessments indicate that a high proportion of pupils achieve the expected levels of attainment and a significant number achieve beyond this.  They progress well across a wide range of D&T competences and extend their capability in mechanisms, control and structures. They evaluate thoughtfully and against the criteria set for the success of their products.  Designing is carefully structured with the set projects and pupils are very well prepared and stimulated by the methods teachers use to help them to think

p.2

Achievement and standards

creatively. Their designs are imaginative, and during the visit, I observed pupils successfully solving technical problems as they proceeded through their practical work.  However, attainment overall is not yet outstanding because pupils are not given sufficient opportunity to develop capability using resistant materials and to design with the aid of computers.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is excellent.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Staff are highly professional and enthusiastic, and they work collaboratively to great effect.  They have had excellent support from you and the D&T co-ordinator to develop their wide range of expertise and to draw upon good practice gleaned from sources beyond the school.  Planning is very thorough, giving all pupils excellent opportunities to learn within a wide range of D&T activities.  Teaching is lively, varied and brisk. Some of its many excellent features were: use of sources outside the school for pupil investigation; lively teaching of design theory and technical vocabulary; high levels of pupil involvement in practical work and designing as they solved problems in their practical activity; and well managed and highly co-operative group activities for pupils.  The management of classrooms and resources is first class and this supports the high quality of practical learning within D&T.  Assessments of pupils’ progress are accurate and regular.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the D&T curriculum is excellent.

p.3

Quality of curriculum

 Curriculum planning is meticulous in the long, medium and short terms. Planning successfully incorporates a broad coverage of the subject programme of study, making intelligent use of QCA units of work.  Adequate time is allocated to D&T and various patterns of organisation are used, including short projects worked on weekly for a time and extended activities covering a full day or more of the curriculum. Time is exceptionally well used.

p.3

Quality of leadership and management

The quality of leadership and management is excellent.

p.3

Quality of leadership and management

 You and your senior staff manage the curriculum with care and precision, giving the teaching of D&T an excellent environment in which to thrive.  The subject co-ordinator has an outstanding grasp of D&T and how it might best be led, organised and evaluated within the school.  Self evaluation is frank, evidence-based and accurate. It forms very firm basis for further development.  Many adults were observed helping in classes during the visit. Their work was effectively co-ordinated and among their various contributions they helped to secure very good health and safety of the pupils through careful supervision.

p.3

Inclusion

The contribution which D&T makes to inclusion is excellent.

p.3

Inclusion

 Levels of enjoyment are very high within the subject throughout the school.  Pupils with learning difficulties are carefully provided for and this helps them make very good progress.  Some pupils who are deemed less able in the core subjects are very enthusiastic about D&T and two of these are identified as being “gifted and talented” in this subject.  There is no discernible difference between the attainment of girls and boys.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 strengthening the coverage of computer-aided designing, especially in Key Stage

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 increasing the use of resistant materials such as plastics and wood in Key Stage 2. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop design and technology in the school. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion