Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Toft
- Postcode verified
OL6 6DP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory overall, with some good and some excellent aspects. p.2
- The teaching seen in the two lessons observed ranged from good to excellent. p.2
- The assembly to celebrate pupils’ work on the Victorians and their creation of Victorian toys was highly effective in celebrating a worthwhile and interesting project. p.2
- Teachers overall have good or excellent general teaching skills. p.2
- Planning is excellent for the younger classes and sound overall, but it is patchy in Key Stage 2. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion2
“Inclusion within D&T is good.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 815
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs S Hudson Headteacher St Christopher’s RC Primary School St Christopher’s Road Ashton Under Lyne Tameside OL6 6DP
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology
Thank you for your hospitality and co operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 15 May 2007 to look at the work in design and technology.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.
p.1
Design and Technology
The overall effectiveness of design and technology was judged to be satisfactory with some very good features.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards are satisfactory overall and are very good in the Foundation Stage and at the end of Key Stage 1.
p.1
Achievement and standards
From a starting point below expectations, pupils in the Foundation Stage and infant section make very good and steady progress. This leads to above average standards for seven year old pupils. The infant pupils develop good craft skills, perseverance and concentration as they carry out a wide range of design and make projects. They develop their ideas well as they work through their projects. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 0207 421 6855 enquires@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Progress in Key Stage 2 is patchy. It is good in two of the classes but has been weak in the other classes in recent months due to staffing difficulties and a lack of coverage of the subject. Standards are good in some of the projects, for example the money container seen being designed in Year 4 where pupils achieved well as they solved a variety of technical problems whilst modelling their ideas. In Year 6, the lighthouse project gives pupils
p.1
Achievement and standards
good opportunities to apply and develop their knowledge of electrical circuitry learned in science. However, little D&T has been taught in Years 3 and 5 recently. This and the rather restricted coverage of resistant materials and systems and control throughout Key Stage 2 reduces standards and achievement to satisfactory overall. The use of technical vocabulary is not sufficiently well developed. Pupils with SEN generally make good progress in the curriculum they are taught.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory overall, with some good and some excellent aspects.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
The teaching seen in the two lessons observed ranged from good to excellent. The assembly to celebrate pupils’ work on the Victorians and their creation of Victorian toys was highly effective in celebrating a worthwhile and interesting project. Teachers overall have good or excellent general teaching skills. In D&T, these shine through where they have sufficiently advanced subject expertise. This is good within the younger classes but variable in the older classes. There has been a clear lack of in-service training to cover the more technically demanding aspects of systems and control and resistant materials. Planning is excellent for the younger classes and sound overall, but it is patchy in Key Stage 2. Resources for D&T are well used, but for the older pupils they are modest in scale and there is insufficient resourcing for the more ‘high tec’ elements of the subject, especially systems and control, computer aided designing (CAD)
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
and resistant materials. Teaching space is adequate and very well organised. Pupils are overwhelmingly enthusiastic about D&T. Assessment is under developed among older classes.
p.2
The quality of the curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory overall with some very good features.
p.3
The quality of the curriculum
The new ‘skills based’ curriculum is well developed for the Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 classes. The content of D&T is well covered through the varied range of design and make projects carried out. Links between subjects are giving real and lively contexts for pupils to design and make functioning products. In Key Stage 2, there are gaps in coverage especially in systems and control and resistant materials.
p.3
Quality of Leadership and management
Leadership and management of D&T are good.
p.3
Quality of Leadership and management
The school is a well managed and orderly community in which D&T has a secure place and status within the curriculum. The experienced D&T co-ordinator has a good understanding of the subject and of how to ensure that it is properly covered in the various year groups of the school. Curriculum planning is thorough and this ensures a balanced and satisfactorily deep coverage. The school’s self evaluation is frank and accurate. Useful annual reports on the subject are produced and discussed with you, leading to specific improvement where necessary. Resourcing is adequate and well organised, but the school does not yet make use of the more sophisticated materials and techniques found in schools where provision for D&T is good.
p.3
Inclusion
Inclusion within D&T is good. Pupils of all ages and abilities and both genders are enabled to make sound progress by the inclusive planning and teaching.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed included:
strengthen the teaching of D&T in Years 3 and 5 improve the balance in the teaching of the subject, especially in Years 3-6, through in-service staff training to ensure proper coverage of resistant materials, electrics, systems and control and CAD as finances permit, enhance resources for the teaching of resistant materials, electrics, systems and control and CAD as the skills-based curriculum develops, ensure that the National Curriculum Programme of Study for D&T is rigorously covered. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop design and technology in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed included:
A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion