Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    M6 7FR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+92Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthighly effectiveexceptionallyoutstandingvery wellwell ledenthusiasticeffectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings457w+87
  • Leadership116w+83

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
543
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%Leadership 20%

Full report text

Mr Peter Crompton Principal Pendleton College Salford Greater Manchester M6 7FR

p.1

Sector Skills Area 2: Science and mathematics post-16

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 19 March 2007. I am grateful to your staff for all their work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up their time during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to staff and learners who also gave up their time.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 2: Science and mathematics post-16

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in science. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All college letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half- term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 2: Science and mathematics post-16

The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work, observation of seven lessons and many meetings with ex-students and external interested parties.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 2: Science and mathematics post-16

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in the sciences.

p.1

Learners’ achievement

 Success rates in physics and chemistry are very good to outstanding at AS/A2 and GCSE level.  There is much value added, students generally do better than predictions based upon their entry qualifications.  Students perform well in lessons and in all the work set for them.  Students are attentive, hard working and do much additional work outside of lessons. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Teaching, training and learning

 Teaching is very good to excellent.  Lesson planning is meticulous.  Objectives are clearly set and referred to during lessons.  Teachers are very well prepared and manage the learning experience well.  They have a lively, enthusiastic delivery style.  There is much good questioning and testing of understanding.  A wide variety of appropriate teaching and learning strategies are used including a considerable amount of ILT.  Differentiation in lessons is good.  There is a wide enrichment programme that enlivens students’ studies.

p.2

Programmes and activities

 A wide range of GCSE and GCE level subjects is offered and are highly popular.  A BTEC national diploma is in the planning stages.  Very good relationships exist with the local schools and higher education providers.

p.2

Guidance and support

 There is much work on initial testing and identification of students with learning difficulties.  Highly effective support arrangements exist both in and outside of lessons.  There is very close liaison between science teachers and support workers.  Students underperforming are assiduously followed up.  Target setting with students is used effectively.  There is much celebration of students’ performance.  All students are valued equally and there is much help for those from minority backgrounds.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Assessment of students’ work is frequent and consistently applied.  Learners have a clear understanding of their targets.  The science section is exceptionally well led and managed.  Excellent communications exist.  All staff are fully aware of their duties to share good practice.  Annual self assessment by subject is thorough.  Action planning is simple but effective.

p.2

Leadership and management

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science courses in the college.

p.3

Leadership and management

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion