Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
The Stonehenge School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Feb 2008
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Sanderson
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SP4 7ND
- Name on report verified
The Stonehenge School
- URN verified
126458
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008 p.7
- Students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are known well to teachers, provided with effective support and make good progress. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ■ Reduce the level of variation in students' achievement between subjects, particularly in Years 10 and 11, by improving all to the level of the best. ■ Ensure that all teachers use attainment data well to plan lessons that contain suitably challenging activities for all students in their class. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008 . p.5
- in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008 p.6
- School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,135
- shorter than usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
126458 Unique Reference Number Wiltshire Local Authority 315557 Inspection number 12 February 2008 Inspection date Peter Sanderson HMI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Comprehensive Type of school Community School category 11 °16 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 757 School The governing body Appropriate authority Allan Peach Chair Nigel Roper Headteacher 9 February 2004 Date of previous school inspection Antrobus Road School address Amesbury Salisbury SP4 7ND 01980 623407 Telephone number 01980 625547 Fax number
p.1
11-16 Age group 12 February 2008 Inspection date 315557 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors. During a one-day visit, the inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: achievement and standards; personal development; quality of teaching and learning; and aspects of leadership and management. Evidence was gathered from the school's self-evaluation, published test and examination results, policies, minutes of meetings and other school documentation, observation of the school at work, interviews with staff and students, and parental questionnaires. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation form, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.
p.3
Description of the school
The Stonehenge School is a smaller than average sized secondary school that has slightly increased in size since the last inspection. Most students are of White British heritage and the proportion of students whose first language is not English is well below the national average. The number of students eligible for free school meals is below that found in most schools. Around one eighth of students are from military families. Some of these students enter and leave the school at other than the usual times. The proportion of students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above the national average. The school has specialist provision for up to six students with hearing impairment. The school has very recently been successful in its application to become a specialist mathematics and computing college from September 2008.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008
p.3
Grade: 2
The Stonehenge School provides its students with a good standard of education. It is popular with parents, and students speak positively of their school experience. Achievement is good and standards are average. When students start at the school in Year 7, standards are below average. Standards at the end of Year 11 have improved considerably over the previous two years. The percentage of students achieving five or more A* - C grades, including English and mathematics in GCSE examinations, was similar to the national average in 2007. All groups of students make good progress in their learning from Year 7 through to Year 11. However, there is variation in the progress made by students in different subjects. For example, the progress of students in English language and mathematics was very good in 2007 yet only satisfactory in history, physical education and English literature. The progress made by students in Years 7 to 9 is better than that seen in Years 10 and 11. The leadership team
p.4
Grade: 2
have accurately identified the reasons for this difference. They have made changes to the curriculum and introduced a more rigorous system of tracking students' progress. Test and examination results for current students in Years 10 and 11 indicate that progress in these year groups is improving. The curriculum is good and meets students' needs and interests well. A new 'Pathways' model has recently been introduced in Years 10 and 11. This includes traditional GCSE courses, a range of vocational courses and opportunities for alternative work-based education, alongside GCSEs taken in school. This new curriculum structure is doing much to encourage students of all abilities to achieve well. The school has good plans to extend further the range of vocational courses offered in September 2008. A wide range of trips, visits, clubs and activities are provided for students outside of normal school hours. These are well attended and make a valuable
p.4
Grade: 2
contribution to students' good personal development. Teaching and learning are good. Lessons are monitored regularly by both senior and middle leaders. Records of lesson observations show that staff are given clear and helpful feedback on how to improve both teaching and students' learning. Teachers have good subject knowledge and plan lessons well. They make it clear to students what they are to learn and make good use of a range of activities to engage and motivate them. However, in some lessons teachers do not make effective use of data on attainment to ensure that activities are suitably challenging for all students in the class. Most marking provides students with helpful advice about how to improve their work. However, this good practice is not yet consistent across the school. Students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are known well to teachers, provided with effective support and make good progress.
p.4
Grade: 2
The school has a welcoming and friendly ethos. As one parent commented, 'We find the school very friendly and approachable.' Students behave well in lessons and around the school site, showing a sensible concern for one another. Attendance is similar to the national average. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Students are encouraged to reflect on the needs of others and they raise funds for charitable causes. Students contribute well to their community through the school and anti-bullying councils. Students say they feel safe in school and that incidents of bullying are rare. They are also confident that if they have any concerns or worries these will be taken seriously by staff and the issue dealt with appropriately. Students' understanding of healthy lifestyle choices is good. Many participate in a good amount of physical exercise each week; they also have good opportunities to eat and drink healthily
p.4
Grade: 2
4 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008 during the school day. The well planned work-related dimension to the curriculum, alongside tutorial and personal, social and health education programmes, ensures students develop the personal skills necessary for their future adult working lives. Good procedures ensure the smooth transition of students from partner primary schools into Year 7. The process of induction and support for those students, such as children of service families who join the school in later years, is also good. This is aided by the strong links the school maintains with the armed forces. Clear guidelines and procedures for child protection arrangements are in place and proper attention is paid to health and safety procedures. Checks on staff are robust and meet government requirements. Vulnerable students are well cared for with good links with a range of outside agencies in place to support their well-being. Challenging
p.4
Grade: 2
targets are set for students and good systems are in place for tracking their progress towards these targets. Any students who are identified as underachieving are provided with effective support and guidance. The progress of groups of students is also carefully analysed to ensure that their needs are being met. For example, the careful monitoring of the progress of children from service families indicates that they are making at least similar progress to all other students in the school. Students speak positively about the support and advice they receive. They are given good advice about Year 9 options and the range of opportunities for post-16 study, which enable them to make informed choices for the future. The headteacher leads the school well. He has recently restructured the leadership team so that it is focused effectively on raising students' achievement. Systems of self-evaluation are robust and the leadership team are well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the school.
p.5
Grade: 2
The new line management structure means that senior leaders are now working more rigorously with subject leaders to raise students' achievement. Overall, subject leaders work well to bring about improvements in teaching and students' achievement. However, not all are equally effective in this regard and consequently, there is variation in students' achievement between subjects. The governing body fulfils its statutory role well, and provides the leadership team with effective challenge and support. The financial management of the school is secure. Effective planning has led to the removal of a deficit budget and there is a clear focus on ensuring good value for money. The issues raised at the previous inspection have been addressed. The rise in standards and the accuracy of self-evaluation provide the school with good capacity to improve.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Reduce the level of variation in students' achievement between subjects, particularly in Years 10 and 11, by improving all to the level of the best. ■ Ensure that all teachers use attainment data well to plan lessons that contain suitably challenging activities for all students in their class. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008 .
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008
p.6
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.7
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.7
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.7
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.7
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.7
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008
p.7
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008
p.8
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
13 February 2008 Dear Students Inspection of The Stonehenge School, Amsbury SP4 7ND I should like to thank you for the warm welcome you extended to me during the recent inspection of your school. I very much enjoyed my discussions with you. I thought you would like a summary of the inspection findings, but also hope that you will take the opportunity to read the whole report. Your school provides you with a good education. The main strengths of the school are summarised below.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ You are taught well and make good progress in your learning.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ You know your targets for the end of Year 9 and Year 11, and know how well you are doing.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ Staff look after and care for you well.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ You behave well in lessons and around the school.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ You told me that there was little bullying in the school and that any incidents that do occur are dealt with well by staff. ■ Staff listen to and respond to your views through the active school council.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ You are able to choose to study a wide range of both academic and vocational courses in Years 10 and 11 through the school's 'Pathways' model. ■ Many of you are involved in the wide range of after-school clubs and activities organised by the school. Although your school is good, it could become even better. I have identified two areas for improvement and have asked the school leadership team to ensure that:
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ you make at least good progress in all of your subjects, particularly in Years 10 and 11
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
■ all lessons contain suitable activities that provide you with a good level of challenge.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
I wish you well and look forward to hearing good things about you all in the future. Yours sincerely Peter Sanderson Her Majesty's Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: The Stonehenge School, 12 February 2008
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion