Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Homefield Primary School and SSC

Inspected 5 Feb 2008 · published 3 Mar 2008 · URN 125961

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Feb 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sheila Browning

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BN11 2AA

  • Name on report verified

    Chesswood Middle School

  • URN verified

    125961

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentexceptionallyenjoyeffectivesafeeffectivelymake good progress
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelowpoornot consistentlyweakerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2107w+75
  • What needs to improve98w−21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,168
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Chesswood Middle School Inspection report

p.1

125961 Unique Reference Number West Sussex Local Authority 315372 Inspection number 5 February 2008 Inspection date Sheila Browning Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Middle deemed primary Type of school Community School category 8 °12 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 479 School The governing body Appropriate authority David Romaine Chair D Newnham Headteacher 19 January 2004 Date of previous school inspection Chesswood Road School address Worthing BN11 2AA 01903 204141 Telephone number 01903 215032 Fax number

p.1

8-12 Age group 5 February 2008 Inspection date 315372 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: achievement and standards in mathematics and particularly in relation to girls; establishing whether pupils' personal development and well-being is as strong as the provision suggests in the school's self-evaluation; and whether assessment, including pupils' self-assessment, is being used well enough to bring about improvement in pupils' achievement and standards. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in the report. Evidence was gathered from lesson observations, the scrutiny of pupils' work, assessment data and documents. In addition, interviews were held with pupils, members of the governing body, the headteacher,

p.3

Description of the school

This is a larger than average school in a designated regeneration area. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and those with statements of special educational need is much higher than that found nationally. Most children are from White British backgrounds, though a few are from minority ethnic backgrounds. Attainment on entry varies slightly from year to year, but is mostly below average.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school with some outstanding features. It is popular and parents strongly support the school's work and praise its leadership. Parents say the school is 'attentive to children's needs' and 'my child is happy and really loves going to Chesswood'. The school is well focused on the needs of each child. Pupils' mature, thoughtful behaviour and their great care for one another reflect their outstanding personal development. As one pupil said, 'We like to help each other and try hard to get the platinum awards and to be on the roll of honour'. Pupils greatly enjoy school and this is clearly evident in their smiling faces. For example, Year 4, working with an opera company on their 'Opera Narnia', thoroughly enjoyed rehearsing in readiness for their performance. Strong features include the school's flexibility in responding to individual needs and its good pastoral care. Both demonstrate the school's inclusiveness. A significant minority of pupils

p.4

Grade: 2

whose attendance had been very poor has improved significantly as a result of the excellent links with external agencies and partnerships with families. Child protection and safeguarding arrangements are robust. Racial and bullying incidences are rare and pupils know they each have a named adult that they can talk to if they have a problem. The headteacher is the key to the good leadership and management. He has high expectations for continued school improvement, and this vision is shared amongst an experienced and effective delegated leadership team. Staff know they are accountable and what is expected of them. The school's self-evaluation is accurate and successful action has been taken to improve pupils' achievement, which reflects a good capacity to improve further. Governors provide good support and challenge the school's performance. They have radically changed their working practices and are seeking Governors' Mark accreditation to ensure they are even more effective

p.4

Grade: 2

in their role. Pupils' achievement across the age range is good because all groups of pupils, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, receive good support from teachers and well-qualified teaching assistants. Standards are average by the end of Year 6 and, by Year 7, pupils are on the way to meeting, and often exceeding, the levels expected for their age. This reflects good achievement, given their generally below average starting points. The school recognises that although academic guidance is good, pupils are not involved enough in assessing their own learning. In a few mathematics lessons, pupils selected work set at different levels of difficulty and discussed the outcomes with 'talking partners'. This resulted in them having a clearer understanding of what they needed to do to improve further. Such good practices are not consistently followed throughout the school. Pupils achieve particularly well in reading, science and information and communication

p.4

Grade: 2

technology (ICT). A high priority is given to reading, with dedicated library sessions, and pupils are encouraged to think in a 'scientific way'. ICT is well resourced, taught discretely and used to support learning in other subjects. Improving pupils' writing skills has been an ongoing priority which has resulted in rising standards. Information from the school's rigorous charting of pupils' progress is used very well to trigger additional support. Nonetheless, pupils' achievement in mathematics is relatively weaker than in English and science. The school has identified a group of more able and lower-attaining girls who are not achieving as well as the boys and has set about tackling this. Arrangements have been reviewed for teaching in ability groups, smaller teaching groups introduced and teachers' planning revised to broaden pupils' 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008

p.4

Grade: 2

learning experiences in mathematics. These changes are too recent to have shown a measurable impact on standards. The curriculum is good. A wealth of popular extra-curricular clubs, from film club to nature watch, educational trips and visitors, enrich the curriculum. Special events, culture weeks, and science and activity days provide exciting learning experiences. All pupils learn French. Studies of different countries and 'virtual trips' to China, India and Spain, and links with other schools in Latvia, Honduras and Ghana, all make a positive contribution to pupils' outstanding personal development, including their spiritual and cultural development. As a result, pupils make a good contribution in their school and wider community. They care for the wildlife area, recycle paper and mobile phones and listen to and question local councillors and politicians. Pupils are well prepared for their future lives. Pupils have a very clear appreciation of the importance of

p.5

Grade: 2

leading safe and healthy lifestyles. They are proud of the vital role that the School Council has played in bringing back hot lunches and they are setting up a healthy snack stall. Lessons are engaging; the use of interactive whiteboards and good quality learning resources have increased pupils' enjoyment and involvement in their learning. This is why teaching is good. Marking is often, but not always, linked to pupils' learning targets, and includes some helpful comments to move pupils on. Teachers use well-tried teaching methods and ensure pupils understand exactly what it is they are going to learn. Whilst lesson planning indicates work is generally well matched to pupils' differing abilities, this is not always the case. In some lessons, particularly in mathematics, the work set does not always offer appropriate challenge to all pupils.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ ensure work is always well matched to pupils' different learning needs so they are always fully challenged, particularly in mathematics ■ ensure greater consistency in involving pupils in assessing their own work to help them improve their achievement and raise standards. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

5 February 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Chesswood Middle School, Worthing BN11 2AA Thank you for making me so welcome when I visited your school recently. How nice it was to watch you hard at work but really enjoying yourselves. You told me lots of things about your school which were very useful when it came to writing my report. I am writing to tell you that Chesswood is a good school. Here are some other important things about your school:

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ you make good progress, especially in your reading, science and ICT

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ teaching is good and teachers make sure your lessons are interesting

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ the curriculum is good and you told me about the excellent clubs, activities, visits and visitors that you enjoy so much ■ the headteacher, governors and staff are all working hard to help you do your very best and make the school even better than it is ■ your behaviour and attitudes to school are outstanding; you treat other people really well and get on so well together ■ you know a lot about people from different cultural backgrounds and appreciate their differences ■ the school takes good care of you, it is safe and you know so much about how to lead safe and healthy lifestyles. Here are some things the school has been asked to improve:

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ refine lesson planning to ensure work is always well matched to your different learning needs so that you are always fully challenged ■ involve you more in assessing your own work.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

You can do your bit by continuing to work hard and telling your teachers if the work you do is too easy or too hard for you. Also, you can help your teachers in checking how well you are doing. Sheila Browning Lead Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Chesswood Middle School, 5 February 2008

p.9

Annex B

Inspection of Chesswood Middle School, Worthing BN11 2AA

p.10

Annex B

Thank you for making me so welcome when I visited your school recently. How nice it was to watch you hard at work but really enjoying yourselves. You told me lots of things about your school which were very useful when it came to writing my report. I am writing to tell you that Chesswood is a good school.

p.10

Annex B

Here are some other important things about your school:

p.10

Annex B

• you make good progress, especially in your reading, science and ICT • teaching is good and teachers make sure your lessons are interesting • the curriculum is good and you told me about the excellent clubs, activities, visits and visitors that you enjoy so much • the headteacher, governors and staff are all working hard to help you do your very best and make the school even better than it is • your behaviour and attitudes to school are outstanding; you treat other people really well and get on so well together • you know a lot about people from different cultural backgrounds and appreciate their differences • the school takes good care of you, it is safe and you know so much about how to lead safe and healthy lifestyles.

p.10

Annex B

Here are some things the school has been asked to improve:

p.10

Annex B

• refine lesson planning to ensure work is always well matched to your different learning needs so that you are always fully challenged • involve you more in assessing your own work.

p.10

Annex B

You can do your bit by continuing to work hard and telling your teachers if the work you do is too easy or too hard for you. Also, you can help your teachers in checking how well you are doing.

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion