Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Mary and St John Church of England Primary School

Inspected 11 Mar 2008 · published 31 Mar 2008 · URN 123213

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Keith Sadler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Mar 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Keith Sadler

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OX4 3AJ

  • Name on report verified

    SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    123213

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyexceptionallyeffectivepositivestrongeffectivelyproudthrive
Criticismweakinadequateconcernsconcernweaknessesunsafenot consistentlybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1665w+31
  • What needs to improve1056w+7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,691
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 39%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

123213 Unique Reference Number Oxfordshire Local Authority 314543 Inspection number 10 °11 March 2008 Inspection dates Keith Sadler Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 383 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Joan Clanchy Chair Mrs Pip Murray Headteacher 8 March 2004 Date of previous school inspection Hertford Street School address Oxford OX4 3AJ 01865 248865 Telephone number 01865 725156 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 10 °11 March 2008 Inspection dates 314543 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This above average sized primary school serves a culturally and social diverse community in East Oxford. The school operates in three parts on two sites. The Hertford Street site accommodates the Key Stage 1 pupils. The children in the Foundation Stage are taught in the Comper Foundation Stage School that is based on the same site. These children are taught by staff of both Comper and SS Mary and John, who are led and managed by the headteacher of the Foundation Stage school. Key Stage 2 pupils are accommodated on a site in Meadow Lane, which is almost a mile away. About half the pupils are of White British heritage. Others come from a wide number of ethnic backgrounds, the largest group being of Pakistani origin. At present, 15 different languages are spoken in the school and the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is double the national average. The number of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities (LDD) is similar to other schools. The school holds the

p.3

Description of the school

following awards: National Healthy Schools, Eco School and Sports Activmark.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory standard of education. Pupils are prepared appropriately for secondary education. Pupils make satisfactory progress and attain standards that are in line with the national average. Pupils that are at an early stage of learning English make progress that parallels that of their classmates. The provision for this large group of pupils is generally good, although no member of the leadership team currently has oversight of their provision. In 2007, results of national tests at Year 6 were below average partly because this group, along with some more able pupils anticipated to gain the higher level, did not attain the expected levels. Although a large majority of parents who returned questionnaires said that their children enjoy school and that they are safe and well cared for, a number said they thought leadership and management was not good. Leadership and management are satisfactory, and good measures

p.4

Grade: 3

have been taken to arrest the weak results of 2007. Parents are correct in suggesting that, until last year, there had not been a sufficiently strong focus in senior leadership to drive forward provision and pupils' progress. Senior leaders had not been sufficiently proactive. Instead, they responded to weaknesses and were reactive. The headteacher has steered the school appropriately to ensure that provision and pupils' achievement have strengthened considerably. Although a number of parents feel that communication systems are not appropriate, the level of information that the school provides matches that of most schools. Senior staff recognise that they need to be more available to deal with parental enquires and concerns, particularly at the Meadow Lane site. Because there has been an improvement in the quality of teaching and learning, pupils' progress is improving in all year groups. Despite current teaching being good, a legacy of inadequate

p.4

Grade: 3

progress in the school year 2006 - 2007 and some weaknesses in academic guidance mean that progress is still only satisfactory. Improvements in the assessment of pupils' work have enabled staff to set activities that are better matched to individual needs. However, these improvements are not consistently applied in all classes. In addition, good procedures have led to closer tracking of pupils' progress, particularly in English and mathematics though these, too, are not implemented consistently in all classes. Pupils' personal development is good. Pupils thoroughly enjoy learning and are proud of their school. They thrive in their personal development because of the good care taken by staff. Pupils of all ethnic origins and backgrounds enjoy working and playing together and they are keen to point out how their school benefits from the rich diversity of cultures represented in the pupil body. They have a good understanding of what constitutes a healthy lifestyle and

p.4

Grade: 3

Children start in the Comper Foundation School with a wide range of skills that overall, are at levels similar to those expected for their age. They make steady progress and the quality of teaching by the staff of SS Mary and John is satisfactory. Children enjoy the activities and learn and work well together. The curriculum is good and consists of an appropriate balance between activities that are directed by the teacher and those that the children choose for themselves. Children benefit from a wide range of good quality resources, both inside and outdoors. There 4 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008 are good arrangements for checking progress, and assessments are used well to guide staff in planning the next range of activities.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise standards by ensuring that senior leaders concentrate on strengthening achievement in English, mathematics and science. ■ Ensure that the recently developed strategies to improve the quality of teaching and learning are applied consistently in all year groups, and that teachers make regular use of information about pupil's attainment to check their progress. ■ Improve access and communication systems with parents to enable them to raise comments and concerns, particularly at the Meadow Lane site. A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged to be satisfactory but who have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils enter Year 1 with skills and abilities similar to those found nationally and standards in national tests for Year 6 pupils are average. This marks satisfactory achievement overall. Standards in Year 6 dipped in 2007 to levels that were significantly below average. This is because some of the more able pupils and those that speak English as an additional language and some who find learning more difficult did not make the expected progress. However, because these groups have been provided with extra help and challenge, their progress is now satisfactory, and in some classes, it is good. Current Year 6 pupils are on course to attain average levels and those in Year 5 are attaining standards that are above expectations.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils have positive attitudes and behave well. The school is a happy place where pupils from many different backgrounds enjoy learning together. Their attendance is satisfactory. They have strong views on a number of issues, showing care and concern about their immediate environment and beyond. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They have a keen sense of right and wrong and are able to reflect on matters that concern them and, as they get older, on wider issues such as global citizenship. They speak positively about other faiths and cultures and have a good understanding of the multi-cultural world in which they live. Pupils make a very strong contribution to school life through the school council. They are proud to have been elected. As one Year 3 pupil said, 'We make the school more like children want it to be'. Similarly, the eco-council, playground buddies and the good behaviour patrol

p.5

Grade: 2

all take their roles seriously and are keen to play their part.

p.5

Grade: 2

The quality of teaching and learning is good. This has successfully reversed the decline in standards exemplified by the weak test results in 2007. Classrooms have a calm and purposeful atmosphere in which pupils enjoy learning. Lessons are clearly planned with work that is well 5 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008 matched to pupils' different learning needs and preferred learning styles. Because teachers routinely highlight their expectations, pupils focus their efforts and they are becoming increasingly more involved in understanding how well they are doing. In the best lessons, pupils are active and benefit from some imaginative tasks, which challenge them well. The provision for pupils that find learning hard is good. Pupils' needs are identified early and good programmes are put into place for their development.

p.5

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. It is effective in promoting pupils' personal development but is only just starting to make a significant impact on pupils' progress and to improve standards. Much work has been done to develop the curriculum since the previous inspection. There have been significant improvements in the curriculum for Foundation Stage children and there are now much closer curricular links with Year 1. The curriculum for pupils in Years 1 to 6 emphasises appropriately the links between various subjects and this has increased pupils' enjoyment. It is well enriched through participation in many local projects, together with a range of musical and sporting activities all of which pupils enjoy.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care, guidance and support provided for pupils are satisfactory. Good care is taken of their welfare and safety. Personal development is monitored well and this leads to effective levels of individual support, for example, where behaviour is a concern. The school sets a good example to pupils about healthy lifestyles and who to tell if they feel worried or unsafe. The school keeps itself well informed about attendance and works with parents to keep rates at satisfactory levels. Support and guidance for pupils' academic development is satisfactory. The school has recently adopted a more comprehensive programme of tracking of pupils' learning but this is not yet fully effective across the school. Pupils are given curriculum targets to show what they need to do to reach the next stage of their learning. Their understanding of targets is much stronger in writing than for numeracy.

p.6

Grade: 3

The quality of leadership and management is satisfactory. Its impact on provision and pupils' progress has been hampered by a lack of focus on raising standards. The disappointment of the weak Key Stage 2 results in 2007 has led to significant and helpful strategies being put into place, to ensure that this does not occur in the future. As a result of improvements in the tracking of pupils' progress, linked to more focus on raising standards and new lesson planning procedures, the barely adequate progress has been arrested and there are clear signs of satisfactory and, in some classes, good progress being made. This demonstrates a satisfactory capacity for further improvement. The school has satisfactory procedures in place for monitoring and evaluating its work and its accurate identification of improvement projects is making a positive impact on both provision and pupils' progress. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008

p.6

Grade: 3

Governance is satisfactory. Governors are deeply committed to the further improvement of provision and standards and are keen to see that the school's effectiveness strengthens. However, their actions have only recently started to have an impact. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

20 March 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School,Oxford,OX4 3AJ Thank you for welcoming us to your school during our recent visit. We enjoyed meeting you and watching you learn and play. We were pleased to hear that you enjoy school and learning. Yours is a satisfactory school and there are some good things about it. You told us that you feel safe in school. We can see that this is because the staff take good care of you. The adults work hard for you and the teaching is good. We were impressed with the way that you listen well in lessons and enjoy learning. Your behaviour is good and you have a good understanding of how to stay safe, lead a healthy life and, most of all, you enjoy taking responsibility. However, your school can improve. The standards that you reach are not high enough in English, maths or science, so we have asked your headteacher and senior leaders to concentrate even

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

more on making sure that more of you make quicker progress. We have said that they should do this by making sure that the really good ways that teachers help to make your learning better are used in all lessons and that they should use the tracking information to check your progress. Finally, we have asked that more information is provided for your parents and more chances given for them to meet with senior members of staff to discuss any comments or concerns they have. This is particularly at the Meadow Lane site. You can help by continuing to work hard towards meeting your targets. Best wishes for the future. Keith Sadler Lead Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: SS Mary and John Church of England Primary School, 10 °11 March 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion