Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

John T Rice Infant and Nursery School

Inspected 13 Dec 2007 · published 14 Jan 2008 · URN 122452

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Sue Hall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Dec 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Hall

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    John T Rice Infant and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    122452

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelyexceptionallyimprovedeffectivekeenconsistentlyoutstanding
Criticismbelowconcernsinadequatelimitednot alwayslowernot effectivenot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1650w+66
  • What needs to improve948w+30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,569
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 36%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

John T Rice Infant and Nursery School Inspection report

p.1

122452 Unique Reference Number NOTTINGHAMSHIRE LA Local Authority 314298 Inspection number 12 °13 December 2007 Inspection dates Sue Hall Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Infant Type of school Community School category 3 °7 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 131 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Isabella Vint Chair Miss Maureen Tunney Headteacher 12 July 2004 Date of previous school inspection Braemar Road School address Forest Town Mansfield Nottinghamshire NG19 0LL 01623465588 Telephone number 01623465460 Fax number

p.1

3-7 Age group 12 °13 December 2007 Inspection dates 314298 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This slightly smaller than average infant school serves the area in and around the Newlands Estate, Forest Town, a former mining area near Mansfield, which is part of a local regeneration project. In 2005, a Children's Centre was built adjacent to the school to help support local families. Children enter the Foundation Stage with a wide range of early experiences, with some having attended the Children's Centre or other local groups. Nevertheless, on entry to the Foundation Stage, skills are below, and sometimes well below, the expectations for this age. The large majority of children are of White British heritage and a few are at the early stages of learning English. The proportion currently eligible for free school meals is above average although the number with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is below that often seen. The school holds an Investors in People award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007

p.3

Grade: 3

This is a school that provides a satisfactory quality of education. At this time of year, children particularly enjoy being at school and sharing Christmas activities with their families and others in the local community. Parents are mostly pleased with what is provided for their children and as one notes, 'The teachers are committed and enthusiastic and I have great respect for them and the school.....' When they enter the Foundation Stage, most children want to learn. They make satisfactory progress in the Foundation Stage, but when they enter Year 1, standards are still often below expectations. In assessments at the end of Year 2, attainment in several recent years has been close to national averages, but in 2007, standards fell considerably because fewer children achieved above the average levels. Tracking information shows this was at least in part because there was a larger proportion of children with learning difficulties than in other groups.

p.4

Grade: 3

Nevertheless, taking this into account, the school recognised that not all groups of children were achieving all they could. In the last year, there have been many changes to planning and the way the school checks and tracks the progress made. In Years 1 and 2 children now make satisfactory progress and standards are set to rise in reading, writing and mathematics. The personal development of the children is good. Most are happy and enjoy the range of activities available. The majority behave well, although a small number of parents have concerns about behaviour. Most children know they have to play sensibly to ensure that everyone is safe. They understand that eating healthily makes them fit and they enjoy physical activity. Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Staff manage children effectively ensuring that they make progress in all areas of their learning. The planning of activities to meet the needs of

p.4

Grade: 3

groups of different abilities is satisfactory although at times more could be expected of them. The curriculum is satisfactory. Staff have taken notice of a recent inspection of mathematics in the school. They have reduced the number of worksheets and provided more opportunities for children to record their own ideas. Care, guidance and support are satisfactory overall. The pastoral care of children is good because staff know and care for the children well. While the checks and tracking of progress have been improved, some aspects need to be embedded further to ensure all information is used well enough to set challenging activities. Leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. The school has long established practices and routines but the tracking of progress has not been as effective as it could be. The English and mathematics subject leaders have a good grasp of their new roles and have

p.4

Grade: 3

been instrumental in leading recent improvements. School self-evaluation is accurate. Staff and governors recognise both the strengths and areas for improvement, including the growing use of assessment data. There is satisfactory capacity to improve further and this is good in some key areas while still at an earlier stage in others.

p.4

Grade: 3

On entry to the school, many children have limited skills in speaking, early reading and writing and in their personal and social development. Most settle well and are keen to do what their family and friends can do. Teaching and learning in the Foundation Stage are satisfactory, as is the curriculum. The range of activities includes adult directed tasks and opportunities for children to make choices in their learning. Because children are keen to live up to the 4 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007 expectations of staff, they make at least satisfactory progress and those of all abilities achieve satisfactorily. However, while there are good elements to teaching, occasionally staff do not demand enough of children. When they enter Year 1, their skills are still below those expected, particularly in the area of communication, language and literacy.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the quality of teaching by consistently challenging children of all abilities.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Make sure that the information available from recently improved systems to check and track the progress made is used to inform planning. ■ Ensure that the monitoring of the work of the school is rigorously evaluative in order to identify further areas for improvement.

p.5

Grade: 3

In recent years, standards at the age of seven have usually been similar to those seen nationally and children have done well in their writing. However, standards dipped in reading in 2006 and there was a considerable fall in 2007, especially in reading and mathematics. This was because, while a reasonable proportion of children attained the lower levels in assessments, fewer reached above the average level. The school had been aware from assessments that standards in 2007 were set to dip. Nevertheless, the average and higher achieving children, and particularly the girls, did not make the progress anticipated and not all reached their individual targets. To address this several changes have been made. These include more support activities for the lower achieving and other targeted groups to ensure they make consistent progress. Children of all abilities now achieve at least satisfactorily and tracking information indicates standards

p.5

Grade: 3

are set to rise to around national averages.

p.5

Grade: 2

Children enjoy coming to school, most get on well together and their behaviour is good overall. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good and children are given clear messages about working together and helping others. Children develop a good sense of the school and local community. They understand how to stay safe and most play together well, although at times they can be a bit unfriendly towards each other. Most know that if anyone says nasty things to them, or is unkind, they can tell the staff and this is usually resolved. However, a small number of parents have concerns about bullying. The school addresses this issue well and with consideration for the community as a whole. Children particularly enjoy physical activities and understand how this, coupled with sensible food choices, helps them stay healthy. Attendance is satisfactory but affected by holidays in term time, which does not always support

p.5

Grade: 2

learning or help children prepare for their future.

p.5

Grade: 3

Staff have good relationships with the children, which ensures that lessons are conducted in a productive manner, harnessing the children's natural enthusiasm. Because activities interest the children, most try hard and make progress in their learning. Support staff play an effective 5 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007 role in working with children both within lessons and in withdrawal groups. This helps teachers focus on the needs of others. The planning of lessons is satisfactory, with linked activities for those of different abilities. However, at times staff do not expect enough of children, either through the level of challenge or in the presentation of their work.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teachers plan a satisfactory range of activities that reflect the children's interests. There is a sound focus on the development of key areas of literacy and numeracy, although at times staff miss the opportunities to focus on how speaking and listening skills will be developed across the curriculum. There is a greater emphasis in mathematics on practical tasks and children recording their ideas in their own words. Visits to places of educational interest and visitors to the school enrich the curriculum satisfactorily. Resources are appropriate and the rolling programme of school refurbishment ensures the learning environment is pleasant and stimulating.

p.6

Grade: 3

Staff know and care for the children well, quickly recognising if they are unhappy or need additional help. Support for those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is good, helping them to grow in confidence and develop their skills. The school works well with a range of external agencies to support children and their families. There are good systems to reward the children's efforts and attendance. The checks on those who help in school are satisfactory, as are procedures for child protection and health and safety. However, the monitoring of these areas is not as rigorous as it should be to ensure that the recording of activities and day-to-day procedures is fully effective. Recently, staff recognised that the ways in which progress was checked and tracked was not as thorough as it could be. Many changes have subsequently been made, including the use of information and communication technology to manage the

p.6

Grade: 3

data. However, these procedures are an early stage and information could still be used more effectively to challenge all groups of children.

p.6

Grade: 3

The long-serving headteacher and staff work well together as a team. Staff, including classroom assistants, are valued for the work they do. The deputy headteacher is playing a crucial role in taking a lead in assessment procedures. There have been shrewd appointments of staff, enabling key roles in English and mathematics subject leadership to develop well. Senior staff have opportunities to monitor planning and evaluate the quality of teaching and learning. Such opportunities, however, are not extensive and some of this work is not rigorously evaluative and is therefore of limited help in identifying areas for further improvement. Governance of the school is satisfactory. Governors are keen to develop their role further, for example through more focused visits to extend their first-hand knowledge of provision. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007

p.6

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.8

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

14 December 2007 Dear Children Inspection of John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, Forest Town, Mansfield, NG19 0LL Thank you very much for looking after me when I visited your school recently. I really enjoyed meeting you in lessons, when we had our Christmas lunch and when I chatted with the school council. I think the school provides a satisfactory quality of education for you. These are some of the best things about your school:

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Staff care for you well so you feel safe and know there is always someone to talk to if you are worried. ■ Most of you like coming to school, behave well and say you particularly like playtimes.

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ There is good support for those of you who find learning hard.

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ The staff who help organise what happens in literacy and numeracy are keen to help you do even better in your work. This is what that I think could be improved:

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Teachers could plan activities that are a bit harder for you.

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Staff could use the information from your work to make sure they know what else you need to do. ■ Teachers, and sometimes the governors, could check what happens in school more to see what else could be improved. To help your school, please try to make sure you attend regularly and get on well with everyone all the time. I would like to wish you every success in the future. Yours sincerely Sue Hall Lead inspector 10 of 10 Inspection Report: John T Rice Infant and Nursery School, 12 °13 December 2007

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion