Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Middleham Church of England Aided School

Inspected 5 Jun 2008 · published 25 Jun 2008 · URN 121614

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jun 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robert Robinson

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DL8 4QX

  • URN verified

    121614

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyeffectiveenjoysuperbwell preparedextremelyeffectivelyexcellent
Criticisminadequateweakerconcernlimitedbelowlowerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1930w+88
  • What needs to improve104w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,003
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Middleham Church of England Aided School Inspection report

p.1

121614 Unique Reference Number North Yorkshire Local Authority 314056 Inspection number 5 June 2008 Inspection date Robert Robinson Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 84 School The governing body Appropriate authority Rev Brendan Giblin Chair Mrs S Bell Headteacher 17 January 2005 Date of previous school inspection Park Lane School address Middleham Leyburn North Yorkshire DL8 4QX 01969 623592 Telephone number 0 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 5 June 2008 Inspection date 314056 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: how the teaching and curriculum enable pupils to achieve well; pupils' and parents' views of the school; and the features of the leadership and management that contribute to the success of the school. The inspector gathered evidence from lesson observations, examination of pupils' work, assessment data, interviews with staff, pupils and governors, and scrutiny of documents. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a smaller than average primary school. Almost all pupils are White British. The school serves a diverse community and about half of the children are bussed to school from outlying areas. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is about average but the proportion with a statement of special educational need is well above average. Children join the school from a few pre-school providers and their attainment on entry varies from year to year. Generally, children's skills on entry are in line with typical expectations for their age. At the time of the inspection all of the Year 6 pupils were on a residential visit. The school has gained the Activemark, Healthy Schools and Inclusion Quality Awards.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

Middleham CE (Aided) Primary School provides a good education for its pupils and serves its diverse community well. A strength of the school is the care it provides for all groups of pupils, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. As a result, pupils' personal development, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is good. Parents hold the school in high regard. A typical parental comment was, 'Very impressed with the standard of education both academic and social'. The quality of teaching and learning is good throughout the school and builds on a well planned curriculum. As a result, achievement is good for all groups of pupils, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Pupils thoroughly enjoy school as shown in their superb behaviour and attitudes to learning and good attendance rates. Lessons are interesting and capture pupils' imagination. Visitors and visits, including a residential experience, are used most

p.4

Grade: 2

productively to extend pupils' learning. For example, a visitor challenged older pupils to reflect upon a painting and to use their imagination to describe what it meant to them. This resulted in some creditable imaginative writing. Literacy skills are developed well in other subjects, such as in written accounts of investigations in science. High expectations of handwriting result in well presented work in all subjects. Relationships within class and around the school reflect a happy family atmosphere. Pupils are caring for one another and bullying is not an issue. Assemblies encompass all age groups exceptionally well and provide an important focal part of the school day. The gaining of the Healthy Schools Award reflects the school's good work in this area. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education. Within classes, work is geared to pupils' level of attainment. Effective use of information and communication technology, such as interactive whiteboards,

p.4

Grade: 2

clarifies new learning as well as providing opportunities to consolidate previous learning. Commercially produced worksheets are used in mathematics but occasionally, investigative tasks could be made more pleasurable by the increased use of first-hand documentation and resources. For example, a lesson on learning to read timetables relied on the use of worksheets rather than actual bus and train timetables which could have made learning more meaningful. The marking of pupils' work is detailed and provides good information on strengths as well as effective support and guidance on how to improve. Standards by the end of Year 6 vary from year to year because of the different composition of age groups within a small school. In the 2007 Year 6 national tests, standards were exceptionally high in English, mathematics and science as all pupils reached the level expected of their age and a high proportion reached the higher level in each subject. Standards at the end of Year 2

p.4

Grade: 2

were also exceptionally high in reading, writing and mathematics. Present standards in Years 2 and 6 are above average, rather than exceptionally high, because of a higher number of lower attainers in these year groups than in the previous year. The headteacher leads the staff purposefully. Consistency of good teaching has been achieved throughout the school. Subject leaders are actively involved in rigorously monitoring colleagues' teaching. Sufficient time is provided for thorough observations and feedbacks of 'what went well' and 'points for development'. Data about pupils' performance in end of year tests are interrogated carefully and have successfully helped improve pupils' progress in writing. Recent developments of regularly checking and recording electronically pupils' progress provide a wealth of information about individuals' attainments. This information has still to be used to 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008

p.4

Grade: 2

track individuals' and age groups' progress over the time that they are at the school in order to assist staff to spot any underachievement. Governors play an important role in the success of the school. They have a clear view of what needs to be done to improve the school further. They have identified that the accommodation, particularly for the youngest pupils, requires upgrading. Governors, together with staff and parents, have raised a substantial sum of money to improve the provision for pupils. Plans are well advanced to fulfil this development. The school has improved since the last inspection and it is well placed to continue to do so because of the strengths in the leadership and management at all levels and the quality of teaching, as well as the support of the parents and community.

p.5

Grade: 2

Provision in the Foundation Stage (Reception) is good as are its leadership and management. Children have a great start to schooling and quickly settle because of close links with the pre-school providers and parents. Standards on entry this year are above typical expectations. During the year these children have made brisk progress and are well prepared to work within the early stages of the National Curriculum when they start Year 1. Progress in linking sounds and letter and calculations was particularly fast as these were relatively weaker aspects on entry. Standards in these are now similar to those in other areas of learning. Children's personal, social and emotional development is fostered well. They are keenly interested in learning, behave extremely well and act very responsibly. The children, particularly higher attainers, benefit by working alongside Year 1 pupils. Exciting teaching stimulates children to enjoy their

p.5

Grade: 2

learning. However, they have limited time to extend their education outdoors. Members of staff plan many activities outdoors but accommodation difficulties limit these opportunities. The checking and recording of individuals' progress is very thorough. Children are well prepared for future learning because of their good acquisition of basic skills and wonderful attitudes to learning. Parents are highly satisfied with the progress and care for their children in the Foundation Stage.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Use information from the regular monitoring of pupils' attainment to check individuals' and year groups' progress over the time they are at the school. ■ Develop the accommodation to provide greater opportunities for linking learning indoors with outdoors in the Reception. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Inspection of Middleham Church of England Aided School, Middleham, DL8 4QX Thank you for welcoming me to your school and being so polite and friendly. I enjoyed my visit. I was sorry to miss meeting Year 6 pupils but heard you were having a wonderful time on your residential visit. I want to share with you what I thought about your school. Your school provides you with a good education. Standards in Year 6 are above average. You make good progress in your learning because you are taught well. The headteacher, deputy headteacher and governors know how to improve your school and they are assisted well by other staff. To help you reach higher standards I have asked the staff to make better use of the information gained from the regular checking of your work. It would be helpful for staff to record and check the levels that each one of you is working at, as well as the work of groups, throughout your time at school. I have also asked your school leaders

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

to improve the accommodation for Reception to provide greater opportunities for linking learning indoors with outdoors. I know that you are proud of your school and all get on extremely well together. I was impressed by your excellent behaviour and care and concern for one another. I appreciated talking to you about your work and watching you learn. I wish you well for the future and trust that you will continue to work with the staff to make your school even better. 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Middleham Church of England Aided School, 5 June 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion