Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
The Richmond School, Skegness
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Oct 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Roger Brown
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PE25 3SH
- Name on report verified
The Richmond School
- URN verified
120494
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007 p.7
- The leadership and management of the school are strong and effective. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ■ Develop the curriculum, creating programmes that cater more for the individual learning needs of pupils, including the provision for gifted and talented pupils. ■ Introduce and implement rigorous procedures to promote better attendance. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007 . p.5
- in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007 p.6
- School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families5
“Responses to the parents' questionnaire were overwhelmingly positive.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,216
- shorter than usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
120494 Unique Reference Number LINCOLNSHIRE LA Local Authority 313638 Inspection number 17 October 2007 Inspection date Roger Brown Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 420 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Julie Jarvis Chair Mrs Anne Fisher Headteacher 6 May 2003 Date of previous school inspection Richmond Drive School address Skegness Lincolnshire PE25 3SH 01754 766639 Telephone number 01754 766678 Fax number
p.1
4-11 Age group 17 October 2007 Inspection date 313638 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the pupils' personal development, including how their behaviour affects their learning, and the quality of academic support. In addition, the school's work in developing the curriculum was evaluated to judge its contribution to pupils' progress and their personal development. Evidence was gathered from the school's self-evaluation, national assessment data, the school's own assessment and monitoring records, policies, minutes of meetings and the parents' questionnaires. In addition, the work of some teachers was observed in the visits to classes. Interviews were conducted with some teachers, senior members of staff and a number of pupils. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own
p.3
Introduction
assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified and these have been included where appropriate in this report.
p.3
Description of the school
This is one of several larger than average sized primary schools in the town of Skegness. Pupils come from the town and from some of the surrounding villages. Almost all the pupils are from White British backgrounds and nearly all speak English as their first language. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities is below average and the number entitled to free school meals is very small. The school has 'Healthy Schools' status and was awarded the Inclusion Mark.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school. This confirms the views of the parents and the school's own evaluation of its effectiveness. Responses to the parents' questionnaire were overwhelmingly positive. Two comments were typical, 'I would recommend this school to anyone' and, 'I have always been very impressed with the school.' Pupils like the school. Their learning involves and engages them and they enjoy the wide range of creative activities and sports that the school provides. Pupils' achievement is good and they attain above average standards. Children enter the Foundation Stage with levels of development broadly in line with those expected for this age. From this starting point to the time they leave at Year 6, they make good progress. Since the last inspection, the school's performance in national assessments and tests for pupils in Years 2 and 6 has invariably been above, or well above national averages. The school rightly prides itself on the high quality way it cares for, develops and guides its
p.4
Grade: 2
pupils. Careful monitoring of pupils' progress ensures that, where there are any signs of underachievement, action is taken quickly to provide extra support. Additionally, teachers place a great deal of emphasis on pupils' personal development and well-being, enabling pupils to stay safe and healthy. They listen carefully to the views of pupils and, where they can, respond positively to their opinions and concerns. Regular meetings of the school council and whole-school questionnaires enable pupils' views to be gathered. These keep staff well informed. For example, when a number of pupils pointed out that they had few activities to keep them occupied at lunchtimes; extra games and equipment were provided and older pupils given specific responsibilities. As a result, the pupils report that they are much happier with the arrangements. Behaviour is good. Pupils are polite, friendly and helpful to each other. Their
p.4
Grade: 2
good relationships with staff mean that they know there is someone to turn to if they are worried about anything. The provision for pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The school serves an area geographically isolated from some aspects of mainstream culture. To compensate for this, teachers make an extra effort to bring visitors in to the school, take the pupils to visit interesting places and involve them in many local events. As a result, the pupils make a good contribution to their community. One notable aspect of this is the school's annual enterprise project. Led by Year 6 pupils, but involving all the school, this is successful in raising pupils' awareness of economic issues in a practical but enjoyable manner. The last inspection identified the need to improve procedures to promote good attendance. This was done and, for a time, there was an improvement. However, over the last two years the
p.4
Grade: 2
level of attendance has fallen again and is now below average. The main reason for this is parents taking their children on holiday during term time. This handicaps the learning for many of these pupils, creating gaps in their knowledge and understanding, which hinders their progress. Teaching and learning are good. This is not a complacent school and teachers think hard about the impact of their work. When something is not working well, they are prepared to change and innovate. For example, when it became clear that the school's system to track pupils' progress was unable to provide the detailed information teachers wanted, they changed to a new, more effective, system. This identified a significant gap between pupils' competence in reading and their achievement as writers, and the teachers got additional help to tackle this issue. Subsequently, the school initiated a 'visual literacy' component into its curriculum. This
p.4
Grade: 2
4 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007 exploits digital technology, challenging and engaging the pupils in a creative and exciting way. In a Year 6 lesson for French week, pupils researched information on the internet and in books, about important characters from French history. They wrote notes, produced scripts and filmed presentations, edited and expanded these with slides and other materials. Careful monitoring and evaluation has shown that this way of working has improved pupils' writing skills. The school's curriculum is good overall. Teachers have made great strides in using information and communication technology to motivate and engage pupils. The next stage of this work is designed to cater more specifically for the individual interests of each pupil. There is satisfactory provision for pupils with special gifts and talents, but the teachers understand that, for those
p.4
Grade: 2
pupils who are more able, work needs to be even more challenging. The leadership and management of the school are strong and effective. There is a sense of purpose and energy in the school that helps to ensure that everybody focuses on what will produce the best outcomes for the pupils. The budget is used wisely and the school is well cared for and well resourced. There are sensible plans in place to make good use of the slightly higher than recommended carry forward budget from the previous year to improve provision. The governing body is diligent. Governors monitor and evaluate the progress of the school thoughtfully, consulting widely and seeking guidance and training when they feel it is appropriate. With the standards achieved and the careful management of the budget, the school provides good value for money. Other than the area of attendance, the school has made good progress since the last inspection.
p.5
Grade: 2
For example, aspects of science that were previously weak have now become one of the strengths of the school. The thoughtful approach of the teachers, the drive and vision of the leadership and the good outcomes for pupils demonstrate that the school has good capacity for further improvement.
p.5
Grade: 2
Provision in the Foundation Stage is good because teaching and learning are good. Children enter Reception from a wide range of pre-school settings and the quality of the liaison between the school and these providers varies considerably. Nevertheless, the children settle quickly into the school's routines, confidently fitting into the large school setting. Older pupils play an important role in this process, for example, running the lunchtime 'Huff and Puff Club' for the Reception children with adult supervision. This is enjoyable for everyone and helps the children to form good relationships. Good quality outdoor provision enhances children's personal, creative and physical development. Their achievements in all areas of learning are monitored carefully and their progress recorded to ensure that any difficulties are quickly identified and addressed. Consequently, they make good progress during their time in Reception with most
p.5
Grade: 2
reaching or exceeding the expected levels by the time they move into Year 1.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Develop the curriculum, creating programmes that cater more for the individual learning needs of pupils, including the provision for gifted and talented pupils. ■ Introduce and implement rigorous procedures to promote better attendance. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007 .
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007
p.6
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.7
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.7
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.7
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.7
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.7
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007
p.7
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007
p.8
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
18 October 2007 Dear Children Inspection of The Richmond School, Skegness, PE25 3SH Thank you for being so friendly and welcoming when I visited your school. I really enjoyed my visit and I appreciated how many of you were keen to share your work and ideas with me. I would like to share with you what I thought about your school. You told me that you go to a good school. Your parents told me this as well and I agree with you all. The headteacher, the teachers and all other staff, as well as the governors, are working hard to make even more improvements. They have many good ideas about how to do this. You too play your part in making Richmond School a good school. You have your own ideas for making changes and the school listens and acts on them. Many of you have jobs that involve supporting each other and helping to look after the school. You carry these out well. There is a lot for you to do both in your lessons, on visits and in the clubs and activities you attend. I
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
was impressed to see that the standard of your work is improving. It was clear to me that you try hard with your work, but I noticed that a few of you have quite a lot of time off school, usually because your parents take you away on holiday during term time. This hinders the learning and progress of those of you who are away a lot. There are lots of exciting things going on in your classrooms. I was very impressed with how often and how well you use computers, cameras and other technology. I could see that they made work fun and interesting. I really liked the fact that your teachers plan to make even more use of these exciting activities. I have encouraged them to use the new materials that are now available to challenge those of you who have special gifts and talents. I have also encouraged them to continue to plan how they make some of the work you do special to each one of you. I really hope that they succeed.
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Thank you once again and good luck in the future. Roger Brown Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: The Richmond School, 17 October 2007
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion