Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School

Inspected 18 Mar 2008 · published 23 Apr 2008 · URN 117442

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Mar 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Goodchild

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Good

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SG6 1AG

  • Name on report verified

    Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School

  • URN verified

    117442

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportGood
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 16% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectiveexceptionallyenjoyhigh expectationseffectivelyhappypositive
Criticismbelownot yetnot alwaysinadequatetoo fewlimitedlowerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1726w+73
  • What needs to improve1032w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,728
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%What needs to improve 37%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School Inspection report

p.1

117442 Unique Reference Number HERTFORDSHIRE LA Local Authority 312615 Inspection number 17 °18 March 2008 Inspection dates Margaret Goodchild Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 221 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Steve Parker Chair Mr Gareth Linwood Headteacher 10 February 2003 Date of previous school inspection Norton Road School address Letchworth Hertfordshire SG6 1AG 01462 623322 Telephone number 01462 623355 Fax number

p.1

3-11 Age group 17 °18 March 2008 Inspection dates 312615 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a popular voluntary aided Church of England primary school. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is below average. The percentage with minority ethnic backgrounds is a bit below that in schools nationally. Although English is an additional language for a number of these pupils, none is at early stages in learning English. The percentage of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities has risen sharply from below average in 2006 to well above average. They have mostly have moderate learning difficulties; a small proportion have communication or social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. Attainment on entry is average. The school has gained the Activemark award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school. Most parents are positive about its work and say that it is 'wonderfully caring' and 'a happy, vibrant school where children are encouraged to be individuals'. Pupils achieve well and standards are above average as a result of good teaching and a curriculum that is matched well to pupils' learning needs and interests. Children make good progress in the Foundation Stage, where provision is good, and most meet the Early Learning Goals by the end of the Reception Year. Attainment has been consistently above average at the end of Key Stage 1 in recent years and in 2007, test results were well above average. Attainment at Key Stage 2 has been just above average and most pupils who left in 2007 achieved well during their time at Key Stage 2. However, test results show that progress has not been as good at Key Stage 2 as that at Key Stage 1. In addition, standards in writing are lower than those in

p.4

Grade: 2

other areas in the Foundation Stage and too few pupils reach the higher levels in writing at Key Stages 1 and 2. The school has improved the quality of teaching at Key Stage 2 and put in place a number of support programmes to prevent pupils underachieving. Although there is more work to be done to ensure all pupils do as well as they could in writing and to a lesser extent in science, progress is good overall at Key Stages 1 and 2. Throughout the school, effective assessment systems are in place and teachers at Key Stages 1 and 2 set predictions for what individual pupils should be able to achieve. Pupils are generally well informed about what they need to do to improve and pupil progress interviews contribute to their understanding. Although the school does not yet analyse assessment information to see how well groups of pupils are progressing, it does use test results to judge its overall effectiveness and monitors the progress of individual pupils. In the Foundation Stage, assessment

p.4

Grade: 2

is good but there is no system in place for tracking children's progress or for setting individual targets to move their learning on. Personal development is good. Pupils have good attitudes to learning and enjoy school. They are co-operative and prepared to work hard. They understand the importance of healthy living, say that they feel safe and respond well to opportunities to take responsibility. Pupils are well cared for, guided and supported and the staff are fully committed to their well-being. A good number of parents and volunteers help in school, and as one parent said, the school has 'a wonderfully caring and happy environment.' The school is led and managed well. The headteacher has high expectations and has set a clear vision for the school. He has put in place effective systems to raise achievement, and standards are improving. The school is accurate in judging its own effectiveness: leaders are open and

p.4

Grade: 2

honest about what needs to be improved. Development planning is thorough and priorities are linked well to raising achievement. The school has made good improvement since the last inspection and it is well placed to improve further.

p.4

Grade: 2

Children make very good progress in communication and language, in gaining early reading skills and in their knowledge of numbers. Teaching is good overall. Sessions are planned well to provide a good balance of adult directed and free choice activities. The learning environment is attractive and well resourced. However, those who completed the Foundation Stage in 2007 did less well in writing and in emotional development than in other areas. This is mainly because 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008 the staff's expectations for the way children apply themselves and relate to one another are not always as high as they should be. Parents are appropriately involved in their children's learning and the school provides some very helpful resources for them to use at home. The school has, rightly, identified the need to improve the outdoor area for children in the Reception

p.4

Grade: 2

class although they do have access for some of the time to the area outside the nursery.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise achievement in writing in the Foundation Stage and for higher attaining pupils at Key Stages 1 and 2. ■ Make greater use of assessment information in the Foundation Stage to track children's progress and to set individual learning targets, and use existing data to analyse the progress of different groups of pupils throughout the school.

p.5

Grade: 2

In 2007, pupils at Key Stage 1 did slightly better in reading and mathematics tests than in writing, and the school has found that boys did less well than girls in writing. Attainment at Key Stage 2 has been just above average in recent years. Individual subjects have fluctuated from year to year, however, with well above average results in English in 2006 dipping to average in 2007, whilst results in mathematics rose to well above average. Standards in most subjects are above average and information and communication technology (ICT) supports pupils' learning well. Speaking and listening skills are above average and pupils readily explain their thinking. There is no significant overall difference between the progress made by different groups of pupils. Those with moderate learning difficulties, communication difficulties and social, emotional and behavioural difficulties are supported well and make good progress.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Behaviour is generally good, but there is a small number of pupils who do not show sufficient consideration for others. Links with the church are strong and contribute well to pupils' spiritual development. Opportunities for pupils to visit places of worship of other faiths are limited, however, and their understanding of cultural diversity is only satisfactory. Pupils make good use of the opportunities provided for physical activity through physical education lessons and the wide range of extra-curricular clubs. They are confident that there is an adult they can turn to if they are in difficulty and that rare instances of bullying are dealt with effectively. Attendance is above average and parents say that their children are keen to get back to school after the holidays. Pupils feel very much part of the school community and believe that their views are listened to via the

p.5

Grade: 2

school council. Older pupils take responsibility for younger children through the buddy system and they are represented on interview panels for new staff. Pupils make good progress in basic skills and gain in confidence as they move through the school. They are well prepared for the next stage of their education. 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008

p.5

Grade: 2

Teachers make good use of interactive whiteboards to demonstrate new concepts and engage pupils' interest. They make clear what pupils are expected to do and use questioning well to check their understanding. High expectations are evident in the work that is set and tasks are matched well generally to the needs of different groups of pupils. Teaching assistants make a significant contribution to pupils' achievement, and closer liaison between class teachers and staff who work with pupils of minority ethnic background has brought about an improvement in the way these pupils are supported. Staff generally manage pupils' behaviour well but they do not always insist that pupils show consideration for others, for example, when they move around the class.

p.6

Grade: 2

The curriculum is greatly enriched by themed days and special events, such as arts week, and literacy and ICT skills are promoted well in other subjects. Separate residential trips for pupils in Years 4, 5 and 6 contribute well to their personal development and learning. Provision for gifted and talented pupils is good, for instance with master classes in mathematics and ICT through partnership with a nearby secondary school with specialist status. Pupils with other talents are encouraged to take up local opportunities in sport and dance. There is a good range of after-school clubs, including sporting and musical activities, and pupils have opportunities to take part in inter-school competitions as well as participating in annual school productions. The time allocated to teaching in Years 3 to 6 is below that recommended, however, and the school has not yet made any provision for teaching a modern foreign language in these years.

p.6

Grade: 2

The school works well with outside agencies to support pupils with learning or behavioural difficulties and those for whom English is an additional language. All requirements for safeguarding, risk assessments and child protection are met, and attendance is promoted well. The school uses Makaton signing in the Foundation Stage and throughout Key Stage 1 to support pupils with communication difficulties. Those pupils with moderate learning difficulties are also supported well in class. The progress of individual pupils is tracked through termly assessments and pupils have good opportunities to evaluate their own performance at the end of lessons. They know their targets in English and mathematics and can explain what they need to do to improve their work. Staff are now working to develop targets for science. There are satisfactory assessment procedures in other subjects.

p.6

Grade: 2

Although the senior leadership is currently working at reduced strength, leadership and management are, nevertheless, good. Effective self-evaluation has been undertaken in subjects and clear actions are being taken to raise achievement. Teachers and teaching assistants have 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008 good opportunities to undertake training to increase their effectiveness. The headteacher takes on board the views of everyone involved in the life of the school and has the confidence of most, but not yet all, parents. There have been a number of changes to the governing body and governors are working to develop ways of gathering information for themselves to check the school's effectiveness. Governance is therefore satisfactory overall although the chair and a core of experienced governors are knowledgeable about the school and provide good support

p.6

Grade: 2

to the headteacher. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 2

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

19 March 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Norton St Nicholas C of E (VA) Primary School, Letchworth Garden City, SG6 1AG Thank you for welcoming us when we visited your school. We enjoyed our visit and now I am writing to tell you what we found out about your school. It is a good school and you make good progress to reach standards that are above those found in many other schools. This is because teaching is good and you have opportunities to learn interesting things through special events like arts week and trips like the recent one when the whole school went to the seaside. We were pleased to hear that you enjoy school and that you feel safe and know that the staff are always ready to help you. The teachers are good at sharing information with you about what they want you to learn and you usually work hard and do your best. Behaviour is good but a few of you are sometimes insensitive to other people's

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

feelings, for instance pushing people out of the way in class or in the playground. We would like you to think very carefully about how you would feel if someone did that to you. Apart from that, your school is happy and it has a relaxed friendly atmosphere. The headteacher runs the school well and he and the other teachers want to make it as good as possible for you. We have asked them to do this by:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ helping you to do as well in writing as you do in your other subjects

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ looking very carefully at how much progress you are making and using what they find out about it to help you to learn even better. Enjoy the rest of your time at Norton St Nicholas and keep working hard. Best wishes Ms M J Goodchild (Lead inspector) 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Norton St Nicholas CofE (VA) Primary School, 17 °18 March 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion