Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Bayford Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 5 Mar 2008 · published 9 May 2008 · URN 117387

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Mar 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Ranger

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Care guidance support verified

    Outstanding

  • Curriculum verified

    Outstanding

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SG13 8PX

  • URN verified

    117387

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Care guidance supportOutstanding
  • CurriculumOutstanding
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Teaching and learningGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentvery wellexceptionallyoutstandingeffectivegood progressextremelyeffectively
Criticismlackinadequateweaknessespoornot alwaysnot yetgapsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1743w+87
  • What needs to improve1014w+77

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,728
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 37%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Bayford Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

117387 Unique Reference Number Hertfordshire Local Authority 312598 Inspection number 4 °5 March 2008 Inspection dates Helen Ranger Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary controlled School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 93 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Beverley Wills Chair Mr Peter Jessop Headteacher 24 March 2003 Date of previous school inspection Ashendene Road School address Bayford Hertford Hertfordshire SG13 8PX 01992511259 Telephone number 01992511633 Fax number

p.1

3-11 Age group 4 °5 March 2008 Inspection dates 312598 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

This small school mainly serves the villages of Bayford and Brickendon but, as a result of parental choice, pupils also come from a much wider area. Fewer than average are entitled to free school meals. When children start in Nursery, they have a wide range of skills which, overall, are broadly in line with the levels expected for three-year-olds, although some children lack the social skills needed for school. Almost all pupils are from White British backgrounds and no pupil is at an early stage of learning English. The proportion with learning difficulties or disabilities is above average at present. It has risen recently because the school is identifying pupils who will benefit from extra help as early as possible. Staffing difficulties outside the school's control meant that the continuity of teaching for pupils in Years 5 and 6 was disrupted during the academic year 2005 to 2006. This has now stabilised again.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school. A parent's comment encapsulates the school's successes: 'My child is achieving well and makes me proud as his parent. I feel the school offers a good 'all round' education to all the pupils'. As well as enabling pupils to make good progress academically, their personal development and well-being are fostered exceptionally well by excellent care, guidance and support. Pupils enjoy school immensely. They behave extremely well and feel safe and secure in their learning, so are very well prepared to take advantage of all the school offers. There is a very close partnership with parents who, as one put it, 'very much feel a part of the school family'. From the start, pupils are taught well. An outstanding feature of the Foundation Stage is the way that personal, social and emotional development is supported. The youngest children settle quickly. By the end of Reception, attainment is mostly above the levels expected nationally.

p.4

Grade: 2

Good progress continues in Key Stage 1. Standards by the end of Year 2 have generally been well above average in recent years and, at times, exceptionally high. Standards by Year 6 have varied more widely but pupils have achieved well in relation to their starting points. Year 6 pupils are currently on track to reach above average standards in their end-of-year tests. Standards in mathematics across the school are higher than English. Within English, standards of writing skills are often lower than pupils' speaking, listening or reading abilities. The school has continued to improve well since its last inspection and is well placed for the future. At the heart of its achievements are effective leadership and management, based on good monitoring. Staff track pupils' individual progress regularly and, for example, have taken prompt action to improve writing as a result. The tracking systems for younger and older pupils

p.4

Grade: 2

are very similar and are used well to set individual, class and key-stage targets. However, the available information is not analysed enough on a whole-school basis. As a result, staff and governors do not have easy access to an overview of the progress pupils make across the school with which to inform their planning. The curriculum has been developed very well in recent years and is now excellent. Some initiatives, such as those to improve pupils' writing, have not yet had a full impact on standards, but the school provides a rich and varied range of activities. Productive links with other schools and agencies have given pupils a wider range of physical activities and clubs than a small school could normally provide. Alongside the regular provision for pupils' personal, social and health education, this means that pupils have a first-rate understanding of how to lead healthy lives. Taken together with their good academic skills, they are well prepared for the next stage of

p.4

Grade: 2

education and are developing solid foundations for their future lives. Staff and governors work well together. Except for the more complete picture of overall achievement that is needed, they have a clear view of the school's strengths and weaknesses. They produce detailed, relevant plans for future developments. The criteria identified for monitoring initiatives are generally good, but some lack a sharp enough focus on how the school will check that any actions have resulted in improved outcomes for pupils.

p.4

Grade: 2

Children get a good start in the Foundation Stage. There is very good liaison between Nursery and Reception staff that ensures continuity across both years. Adults provide an interesting 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008 range of well-planned and well-organised activities, both indoors and outside. Children have opportunities to work independently and to make choices, as well as experiencing focused activities alongside adults. They make good progress in all areas of learning. There are effective arrangements to ensure a smooth transition to Year 1. The Foundation Stage teacher is scrupulous in her assessments of individuals. This means that staff have very good quality information to ensure that their planning caters for the full range of needs and interests.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Ensure that writing standards rise as a result of changes to the curriculum and how it is taught. ■ Use tracking information to provide a clearer view of how well pupils achieve across the school as a whole. ■ Ensure that action plans include a consistently sharp focus on how the impact of initiatives on pupils will be checked.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils from all backgrounds do well academically. The national assessments in Year 2 demonstrate pupils' good progress in Key Stage 1. In 2007, pupils reached high standards in English. Results in mathematics were particularly strong because all pupils reached at least Level 2 and half reached Level 3. The current Year 2 pupils are on course to reach above average standards this year in reading, writing and mathematics. Last year, the results of Year 6 tests were mostly good, although a smaller than average proportion of pupils reached Level 5 in English. The current Year 6 group is working at above average standards. This is reflected in school targets which indicate a significant improvement in the proportion working at Level 5 in English. Pupils who need extra help with learning and those who find lessons easier do equally well for their capabilities. The early identification and regular monitoring of any special learning

p.5

Grade: 2

needs ensure that this continues to be the case.

p.5

Grade: 1

Pupils' personal development is a significant strength. Their overall spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is excellent. The oldest pupils are mature, considerate and thoughtful. Bullying and racism are notable by their absence. Pupils' great enjoyment of school is reflected in improved attendance rates. The school has made good progress with the very small number who had poor attendance records so that current attendance is above the national average. Pupils contribute extremely well to the school and wider community through activities such as their school council, charity fund raising and parish activities. They have worked at a local animal park to design a garden and seating area. They have a good understanding of the wider world, exemplified by their links with an Indian school and visits such as those to a synagogue and a Hindu temple. 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008

p.5

Grade: 2

Teaching and learning are good in all age groups. Teachers and teaching assistants work well together. There are outstanding features, such as the quality of relationships that underpin lessons and the support given to those with learning difficulties or disabilities which enables them to play a full part in activities. Teaching addresses any apparent gaps in provision; for instance, teachers are increasingly planning writing activities that link subjects together, so that pupils are better motivated to write for a range of purposes. Pupils are engaged well by good use of resources, including interactive whiteboards. The day-to-day assessment of learning is effective. Marking is mostly good, especially in English. Pupils receive accurate feedback on their achievements, but are not always given enough time to reflect on the marking or to decide for themselves how they can improve their own learning.

p.6

Grade: 1

The school offers an outstanding curriculum. In response to an issue for improvement from the previous inspection, there has been very good progress in ensuring that activities are planned to match the wide range of ages and abilities in each class. Additionally, the range of clubs and visits has been extended very well. The playground is well developed as an attractive and exciting area at breaktimes. The building has been extended and improved. Links with other small schools and with organisations such as the local sports partnership have greatly benefited pupils. Pupils with particular gifts or talents are identified and catered for where possible, for example, by challenging activities in lessons or through art and music clubs. There is detailed planning which very effectively meets the needs of pupils who require extra help, typified very well by the individual education plans for these pupils and by various support groups and

p.6

Grade: 1

The day-to-day care of pupils is of high quality, based on the close links between home and school. Procedures to safeguard pupils and promote their health and safety are very detailed and rigorous. The arrangements for pupils who are vulnerable in any way are managed very well, including effective links with other agencies, such as the specialist services of the local authority. The inclusion coordinator carries out her duties very diligently and monitors pupils' individual progress carefully. Academic support and guidance are good and reflect teachers' detailed tracking of individual progress. Pupils are given relevant personal and group targets which they know very well and which are shared and discussed with parents.

p.6

Grade: 2

There is a strong spirit of teamwork in the school. While responsibilities are officially shared among staff, in practice everyone pulls together for the benefit of the pupils. The headteacher is well respected and knows the school and its families well. He works closely with the chair of 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008 governors. The governors bring a wide and relevant range of skills to their roles. They support and challenge the school well. Although there is scope for further improvement in how pupil tracking information and monitoring criteria are used to check overall performance, the school already uses a good range of relevant self-evaluation strategies. For example, the headteacher and subject leaders carry out regular lesson observations, examine pupils' work and talk to pupils about their learning. Effective use is made of a wide range of training opportunities for

p.6

Grade: 2

staff and governors. Development plans reflect the shared vision of the main partners in the school's work and the determination to continue to improve provision for pupils. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 2

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

6 March 2008 Dear Children Inspection of Bayford Church of England Primary School, Bayford, Hertford SG13 8PX This letter is to thank you for your welcome and help during my recent visit. Many of you, and many of your parents, told me that you think your school is really good. I agree! Mr Jessop makes sure that the staff and governors work together to provide you with good lessons and an extremely interesting range of activities. You told me how much you enjoy school and I saw for myself your enthusiasm and excellent behaviour. The teachers work closely with your parents to make sure that you are growing into sensible and thoughtful young people. The school council gave me an excellent presentation about how you learn to be healthy and to stay safe. You also do well learning other important skills such as in literacy and mathematics. Your teachers are trying to make sure that you all become even better writers and I have asked them to carry on with this. You can help by listening carefully

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

to the adults' advice and trying your best with your own writing. The teachers check your work regularly so that they know how well you are doing term by term. I have asked them to use the information they collect to check your progress right through the school. That means from when you start to when you leave, so that they know you are doing as well as you can. The last thing I have asked the adults to do is, if they make any changes to your school, to check that these end up helping you to learn even more. I shall remember your school as the one with those spectacular views over the countryside, but also as one with so many cheerful and hard working pupils. Best wishes for the future Helen Ranger Lead Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Bayford Church of England Primary School, 4 °5 March 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion