Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Ashley Junior School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Jun 2008
- Inspectorssingle source
John Laver
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BH25 5BP
- Name on report verified
Ashley Junior School
- URN verified
116488
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008 p.7
- Regular staff meetings about pupils' progress now effectively identify individual needs, so that potential underachievers are quickly identified, are given support, and consequently make good progress. p.4
- The school successfully promotes good spiritual, moral and cultural development, whilst pupils' social skills, evident particularly in their collaborative work in lessons, are a strength of the school. p.4
- You also understand the importance of trying to live healthily, you enjoy helping others and your attendance at school has improved. p.9
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,828
- shorter than usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
116488 Unique Reference Number Hampshire Local Authority 312336 Inspection number 23 June 2008 Inspection date John Laver Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Junior Type of school Foundation School category 7 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 283 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Lawrence Tams Chair Mr Ian Rix Headteacher 22 November 2004 Date of previous school inspection Ashley Road School address New Milton BH25 5BP 01425 616510 Telephone number 01425 629130 Fax number
p.1
7-11 Age group 23 June 2008 Inspection date 312336 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: the achievement and standards of pupils, focusing on the current academic year; the quality of teaching and learning; and the contribution of leadership and management at subject leader level. Evidence was gathered from observations in lessons and of pupils around the school; from discussions with pupils, parents, a governor, the senior leadership team and subject leaders; from analysing a range of documents, assessment and tracking data; and from analysing replies to the parents' questionnaires. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as reported in its self-evaluation form, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in
p.3
Description of the school
The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is below average. The great majority of pupils are from a White British background and the proportion of pupils with English as an additional language is well below average. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties, which encompass a wide range of behavioural and emotional issues as well as difficulties with literacy and numeracy, is above average. In some year groups, a significant proportion of pupils join the school other than at the usual time, especially higher up the school.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008
p.3
Grade: 2
Ashley Junior is a good school, providing a good standard of education. The great majority of parents are very complimentary about the school's provision. They are particularly enthusiastic about the quality of care and support, the dedication of staff and the range of activities provided for pupils. Typical of many parental comments were the following: 'I cannot praise the school enough. The school has encouraged my child to believe in her abilities and stretch the boundaries in all respects,' and 'The school is always looking for new ways to make learning fun.' Ashley Junior is also an improving school, although the path of improvement has not always been smooth. The school has long and deservedly had a good reputation in the community, but academic success has been variable in recent years, and there have been several recent changes in staffing. The 2007 national test results showed a falling off in performance in Year
p.4
Grade: 2
6, with many girls, in particular, making insufficient progress. However, this has not been part of a longer-term trend. Standards and achievement have risen in the past year, mainly due to a perceptive leadership team gradually embedding a range of improvement strategies. Standards higher up the school are currently in line with national expectations. Pupils in Year 6 joined the school with below average standards, and in addition, a significant number of lower attaining pupils joined this group when they were in Year 5. All these pupils are currently achieving well and are on track to meet appropriately challenging targets. Year groups in the school are very different in their make up. The current Year 3 and 4 groups are of above average standard, and they are also making good progress and achieving well. Therefore the school has succeeded in raising progress over time so that it is now good, although a minority of pupils do not always
p.4
Grade: 2
achieve as well as they might in individual lessons, when there are insufficient challenges or expectations in the teaching. Pupils' personal development is good. Pupils enjoy school, particularly the good range of after-school clubs, such as those in sport and music. Pupils behave well, apart from occasional silliness in the playground. Good procedures have led to improved attendance. Pupils enjoy opportunities to help each other and raise funds for the wider community, although they feel that the school council could be a more vibrant body. Pupils understand the school's drive to promote a healthy lifestyle. The school successfully promotes good spiritual, moral and cultural development, whilst pupils' social skills, evident particularly in their collaborative work in lessons, are a strength of the school. The school provides strong personal support for pupils, as they and their parents testify. Procedures to assess and track academic progress are relatively recent and still developing.
p.4
Grade: 2
Regular staff meetings about pupils' progress now effectively identify individual needs, so that potential underachievers are quickly identified, are given support, and consequently make good progress. The school uses data to set targets. However, not all pupils know their targets well and teachers do not yet use them systematically in the classroom. Marking is also variable in quality, and often does not give clear guidance to pupils on how they can improve their work, nor do teachers ensure that pupils take their comments on board. Teaching has improved, partly because of good professional development. For example, staff have had opportunities to observe good practice elsewhere. However, there are still some inconsistencies. The good teaching is characterised by brisk pace, good class management and engaging pupils in active learning. This was seen in a Year 3 class, in which pupils enjoyed doing
p.4
Grade: 2
practical measuring experiments in science. Inconsistency arises because sometimes teachers 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008 have insufficiently high expectations of all pupils, particularly in subjects other than English and mathematics. For example, sometimes topic work does not encourage a range of writing, and the tasks are too low-level for some pupils. The school is well led and managed. Parents praise the high profile of the headteacher. He ensures that the school is clearly focused on improvement, and this is reflected in appropriate planning, which in turn is based on good monitoring and self-evaluation. Subject leaders work hard in monitoring planning and standards but, in observing lessons, there is too little focus on the quality of learning or strategies to iron out inconsistencies. The school recognises this, along with other areas for improvement. This awareness, combined with a track record of success
p.4
Grade: 2
in key areas such as improving achievement, ensures that the school has a good capacity to improve further.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Improve the quality and consistency of marking and the use of targets as a means of showing pupils how to improve their work. ■ Raise teachers' expectations, particularly of the quality and presentation of writing, in subjects other than English. ■ Refine the role of subject leaders to encourage a more rigorous approach to monitoring learning. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008 .
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008
p.6
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.7
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.7
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.7
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.7
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.7
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008
p.7
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008
p.8
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
04 July 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Ashley Junior School,New Milton,BH25 5BP Thank you for welcoming me into your school and talking to me so willingly during my brief visit. I was impressed by your politeness and how well I saw you behaving, both around school and in lessons. I particularly liked the way you cooperated with each other when working in groups. Ashley Junior is a good school. Both you and your parents believe this, and I agree. The school helps you learn well and gives you a good range of activities, which I know you enjoy. You also understand the importance of trying to live healthily, you enjoy helping others and your attendance at school has improved. Mr Rix leads the school well and works hard to make learning fun. Your teachers, who are very dedicated to helping you, teach you well, so that most of you make good progress. You are doing better now than in some recent years. The school also looks
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
after you well and gives you lots of opportunities to take responsibility, although I know that some of you think that the school council could be more active. Although most of you are doing well, occasionally you could do even better. I have asked the school to help you to improve standards by giving you more guidance when marking your work, and by using your targets more. I have also asked them to provide more challenging tasks in some of your subjects, so that you have to think harder and can improve your writing even more. I have asked your teachers to share ideas with each other on how to improve your learning. If you continue to work hard, you will help your teachers get you even better results. Once again, thank you for your welcome and good luck for the future. Yours sincerely John Laver Lead Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Ashley Junior School, 23 June 2008
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion