Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Orchard Lea Junior School

Inspected 16 Jul 2008 · published 10 Sept 2008 · URN 116225

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Michael Pye

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jul 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Pye

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    PO15 6BJ

  • Name on report verified

    Orchard Lea Junior School

  • URN verified

    116225

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 26% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyeffectivelypositiveoutstandingenjoyimprovingsafeeffective
Criticismmissedinsufficientinadequatefailsweaknessesweaknessbelownot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1554w+76
  • What needs to improve1181w+5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,702
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%What needs to improve 43%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Orchard Lea Junior School Inspection report

p.1

116225 Unique Reference Number Hampshire Local Authority 312223 Inspection number 15 °16 July 2008 Inspection dates Michael Pye Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Junior Type of school Community School category 7 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 239 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Philip Yule Chair Mr Brendan Carroll Headteacher 18 October 2004 Date of previous school inspection Kennedy Avenue School address Fareham PO15 6BJ 01329 234471 Telephone number 01329 282019 Fax number

p.1

7-11 Age group 15 °16 July 2008 Inspection dates 312223 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This larger than average junior school has more girls than boys. The number of pupils entitled to free school meals is well below average. Pupils come from predominantly White British backgrounds and there are few pupils learning English as an additional language. The number of pupils with learning difficulties is above average, and one pupil has a statement of special educational need. They are mainly pupils with moderate learning or social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. The school has been recognised nationally through the Enhanced Healthy School Award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory education. The pupils' personal development, their pastoral care, and the curriculum are good. Learners benefit from some good links with external partners, for example, a local supermarket has helped promote healthy eating. The headteacher and his deputy work well as a team, setting realistic but challenging targets. They have overseen improvements in the curriculum, in tracking pupils' progress and in the standards and achievement of pupils over recent years. The impact of this can be seen in the high numbers of level 5s in science by the end of Year 6. Governance is good, and responsibility is shared effectively amongst subject leaders. There is a good capacity to improve. From average entry levels, pupils achieve satisfactorily. Current Year 6 pupils have made sound progress. Standards are rising in English and mathematics although, overall, they remain average.

p.4

Grade: 3

Those pupils with gifts and talents achieve well because of the school's specialist provision, such as the 'clematis' group for literacy, and some precise teacher feedback on pupils' progress. Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Pupils enjoy lessons and teachers make good use of strategies to develop their thinking skills. Teachers' good subject knowledge results in secure questioning and helps them to build well on pupils' answers. Pupils' progress slows when teachers do not use assessment information well enough to plan work that challenges pupils of different abilities. The good curriculum is based successfully upon clearly identified learning values such as thinking skills. These contribute significantly to the good personal development of pupils, and underpin their improving achievement levels. For example, where there is a focus on the value of collaboration, pupils' teamwork skills are well progressed. Similarly, the result of the focus on

p.4

Grade: 3

creativity is an array of models made at home or in school. Greek pottery, Tutankhamun's death mask and Viking ships reflect the effect of this work on pupils' art and design skills. Written pamphlets describe how people can keep fit. These are an example of where the themes provide very good opportunities for pupils to write for different purposes. The academic guidance that pupils receive is satisfactory. Marking is supportive, and teachers provide some good opportunities for pupils to assess their own and others' work. However, although the pupils have learning targets, there are missed opportunities in lessons and in teachers' marking to refer to and reinforce them. Consequently, not all pupils know how to improve their work. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Pupils' progress is now tracked carefully, and senior leaders meet with teachers to discuss those pupils who are in need of further support.

p.4

Grade: 3

An established monitoring and evaluation programme is in place that increasingly allows the school to identify relevant areas for improvement. On occasions, self-evaluation is too generous, particularly regarding the analysis and interpretation of national assessment data. Some plans for improving subjects do not use criteria against which the success of school initiatives can easily be measured and there is insufficient focus on the impact of the school's work on raising standards and achievement.

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise standards through ensuring that teachers use assessment data to plan work that challenges pupils at all levels of ability. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008 ■ Ensure that, when planning, monitoring and evaluating improvement, there is a strong focus on the impact of the school's work on raising standards and improving achievement. ■ Improve marking and the guidance given to pupils about their learning targets, so that they know how to improve their work. A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.4

Grade: 3

Achievement and standards have gradually risen over the past three years. In the 2007 national tests at the end of Year 6, pupils attained average standards overall, with mathematics being the weakest subject. A new mathematics curriculum, together with a developing focus on tracking pupils' progress has contributed to raising standards in mathematics amongst the current Year 6. They are on track to reach the national average. The analysis of current pupils' work confirms this picture of average standards and satisfactory achievement. Some well-targeted support and good small group work, well led by teaching assistants, help pupils with learning difficulties to progress well.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils are enthusiastic about school and appreciative about what it offers them. They value the positive relationships they form with teachers and each other. Positive attitudes to school help ensure a calm atmosphere. They socialise very amicably in their leisure periods. The small amount of distracting behaviour in lessons is usually linked to teaching which fails to engage pupils' interest. Pupils have a good understanding about how to stay healthy and keep safe. They appreciate the many opportunities the school offers for physical activity. Understanding of a healthy diet is equally good but is not always reflected in the choices older pupils make for their lunch boxes. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. They show interest and respect in learning about the lifestyles and beliefs of others. Attendance is satisfactory, and has remained stable over a number of years. Pupils develop satisfactory

p.5

Grade: 2

workplace skills. The level of basic skills coupled with some good teamwork opportunities in lessons and entrepreneurial activities such as the Year 6 and;quot;double your moneyand;quot; activity help prepare pupils soundly for the next step in their lives. The school council has a high profile and pupils respect its achievements. Through these and other various positions of responsibility, pupils develop a good understanding of their role in the school and wider community.

p.5

Grade: 3

Good relationships in lessons help ensure that pupils are willing to answer questions and get involved. Whilst teachers make clear the aims of the lesson, some of these are too general, making it difficult for teachers and pupils to assess progress towards them and for teachers to set more specific learning targets. Teachers use interactive whiteboards well to model answers 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008 and to add pace to lessons. Good opportunities exist for pupils to discuss their ideas with their 'response partners.' Pupils' progress slows when teachers do not use assessment data sufficiently well to set work for pupils of different abilities. In lessons such as mathematics, pupils are asked to think quickly and produce their answer on small white boards, which allows for good on-going assessment. Some marking is not focused sharply enough on the next steps in pupils' learning.

p.5

Grade: 2

The curriculum has been reviewed recently; the mathematics curriculum is being embedded and shows early signs of having an impact on standards. Some outstanding themes have been developed that are carefully designed to link subjects together and ensure that pupils use their skills across a variety of subjects. Pupils told of enjoying the themes that are firmly based upon the learning values identified by the adults in the school. Pupils' spirituality is promoted well when they act out and imagine the feelings of being an evacuee during the Second World War. There are missed opportunities to assess pupils' written work in the themes. Music is a strength of the curriculum, and pupils benefit well from the teaching of French. Enhancement, in the form of visits, visitors, residential trips and a good variety of sports and after-school clubs all add significantly to pupils' enjoyment and social development. Links with the secondary school

p.6

Grade: 2

are good and, consequently, pupils benefit from sports and other activities.

p.6

Grade: 3

Care, guidance and support are satisfactory. However, the school rightly prides itself on the quality of its pastoral care. Pupils speak of feeling safe and secure and know who to approach if they have a problem. They talk enthusiastically about attending the Positive Attitudes, Values, Ethos and Self esteem (PAVES) sessions, where there are good opportunities to explore issues that concern them. Pupils gain good personal and moral guidance about the need for respect. They develop an increasing awareness of how their rights in the wider world are linked to responsibilities. The school has good systems in place to track the progress of pupils. They have literacy and numeracy targets but opportunities are missed in lessons to reinforce them. Not all marking sufficiently highlights how pupils can improve their work.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. Senior managers have a very clear vision for the future development of the school, based firmly around improving standards and achievement levels. There are well established monitoring systems. Useful feedback has been given to staff that has, for example, contributed to improvements in the quality of teaching. However, there are weaknesses in the way that some of the information is evaluated. For example, regular monitoring of pupils' progress takes place and involves subject leaders well. However, there are inconsistencies in the quality and depth of their written analyses, with insufficient attention being paid to the impact of school initiatives on standards and achievement. Nevertheless, such monitoring leads to the identification of relevant development plans and some good use of targets to focus on improvement. In writing, a weakness was identified and challenging targets

p.6

Grade: 3

set for improving boys' progress and standards. Changes, for example to resources, were introduced. Through pupil discussions, work scrutiny and observing learning the progress of 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008 boys has been tracked and improvements have followed. The professional development of staff is given an appropriate focus and helps support developments such as identifying and developing the learning values that underpin the curriculum. In some development plans, the criteria against which progress can be judged are not easily measurable. Consequently, the school cannot always clearly judge the impact of the school's work on standards and achievement. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008 .

p.6

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

25 July 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Orchard Lea Junior School,Fareham,PO15 6BJ Thank you for welcoming us into your school during our recent visit. We listened carefully to what you told us about life at your school. We found what you had to say interesting and helpful. I am writing to you to tell you about our findings. Yours is a satisfactory school. This means it does some things well and that other things could be even better. Some of the good things about your school are:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ the way that it encourages you to take responsibility, and develops you as young people; you told us how much you like the work of the school council and the councillors are rightly proud of their work ■ the wide range of people outside of the school that benefit you as learners, for example, theatre groups, musicians and the good links with the secondary school ■ that you told us how safe you feel and that relationships between all of you and the adults are good. We agree with you. ■ that the standard of your work and your progress is gradually improving; pupils who are not quick learners do particularly well, as do those who find learning much easier ■ that you were able to tell us how good the activities are that the school provides for you. The models of Viking ships and Greek pottery, for example, show how much you enjoy these activities. Well done! Your headteacher, his deputy and other adults want you to have the best. We have asked the

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

school to look at three things to help improve it further:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ that your teachers use information about how well you are doing to plan work that always challenges you ■ that when the adults are deciding on future plans they always have in mind the effect of those changes on your standards of work and how well you progress ■ that teachers make sure that all of you know what you need to do to improve your work. You can help by telling them when the work is too hard or too easy for you. Thank you again for your help, and I wish you all the best for the future. Yours sincerely Michael Pye Lead Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Orchard Lea Junior School, 15 °16 July 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion