Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Greenfields Junior School

Inspected 1 May 2008 · published 21 May 2008 · URN 116071

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    1 May 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Keith Sadler

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RG27 8DQ

  • Name on report verified

    Greenfields Junior School

  • URN verified

    116071

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentenjoyoutstandingpositiveexceptionallystronghigh qualityeffectively
Criticisminadequateweaknessnot yetpoornot alwaysconcernsvariablebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2057w+76
  • What needs to improve83w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,100
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Greenfields Junior School Inspection report

p.1

116071 Unique Reference Number Hampshire Local Authority 312168 Inspection number 1 May 2008 Inspection date Keith Sadler Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Junior Type of school Community School category 7 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 206 School The governing body Appropriate authority Ms Diana Harvey Chair Mrs Linda Platt Headteacher 28 June 2004 Date of previous school inspection Green Lane School address Hartley Wintney Hook RG27 8DQ 01252 843822 Telephone number 01252 849921 Fax number

p.1

7-11 Age group 1 May 2008 Inspection date 312168 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school. He investigated how well pupils are doing in mathematics, particularly the higher attaining pupils; how the school's focus on learning has supported more consistent high quality lessons; and how well subject leaders and governors contribute to the school's provision and standards. Evidence was gathered from the analysis of pupils' progress, scrutiny of samples of their mathematics work, observation of lessons, discussions with the headteacher, deputy head and assistant head, a group of governors, the subject leaders for mathematics, English and special needs co-ordinator, and also the school council. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were

p.3

Introduction

not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is of average size. Almost all the pupils are from White British backgrounds. A small number of pupils are eligible for free school meals. No pupils are at an early stage of learning English. The proportion with learning difficulties is similar to the national average. Most of these pupils have either specific learning difficulties or speech, language and communication difficulties. The school has a new headteacher who has been in post for one year. The school has gained the Enhanced Healthy Schools Award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

Greenfields Junior is a good school. Pupils make good progress from their above average entry points and achieve well. The school is supported by almost all the parents, many of whom are fully justified in making positive comments about its nurturing atmosphere and high levels of care. Parents are unanimous in saying that their children enjoy school and are safe. Standards have been significantly above average for the past four years. Results in the national tests in 2007 show that standards in English were the strongest, with a high proportion of pupils attaining the higher Level 5. The staff carry out a careful analysis of pupils' performance and this shows that progress in mathematics, particularly for the most able pupils, was not as good as in English or science. Staff identified a slowing of progress in Year 4 and, as a result, good action has been taken to overcome this. This has included ensuring that teachers' planning

p.4

Grade: 2

has improved, that there is more challenge in the work set and teachers' expectations of what pupils can achieve is extended. These modifications are having a positive impact though the school recognises that they need to be embedded, particularly in the lower school, in order to accelerate progress in mathematics. A few parents commented that the school does not support and extend the most able as well as it might. This is not now the case. Senior staff are mindful that the proportions gaining the higher levels should be increased and ensure that there is strong challenge for these pupils. In consequence, the proportion of pupils in Year 6 who are on course to attain the higher level in mathematics has increased. This is because adjustments have been made to setting arrangements, providing more closely tailored support for these pupils. In these Year 6 'workshop' sessions, the quality of teaching is outstanding. The teacher

p.4

Grade: 2

probes pupils' understanding with high quality questioning demanding, for example, that the pupils explain the strategies that they use when constructing straight line graphs using algebra. These pupils thrive and thoroughly enjoy the challenge of the lessons. Many parents made positive comments about the quality of leadership and management of the new headteacher. Her leadership is excellent. She has successfully built on the many strengths identified in the previous inspection and has re-invigorated the staff. She has introduced more rigour and structure into the self-evaluation processes that enables the school to have an accurate view of its provision and standards. She has done this in a sensitive and inclusive manner. As a result, staff morale is high, teamwork across all of the adults in the school is strong, and the good quality senior leadership group has brought about many improvements. For example, the role of the subject leader has been strengthened considerably.

p.4

Grade: 2

Much training has been provided and staff have responded well. Annual action plans are now in place for each subject and subject leaders are generally effective in their evaluations of the school's provision and pupils' progress in their areas of responsibility. These outcomes are reported to the governors and contribute to the good quality school improvement plan. As a result, there is clear direction and focus on improvement at all levels of management. This, coupled with their recent track record, demonstrates a good capacity for further improvement. Governors make a positive contribution. The quality of governance has improved since the previous inspection. Governors ensure that statutory responsibilities are met, and know the school well. They support the school and fulfil their role in holding it to account effectively. There has also been good action to strengthen the quality of learning. At the time of the

p.4

Grade: 2

previous inspection the quality of teaching was good though there was a weakness in teachers' marking. This was variable and did not always help pupils to know what they needed to do to improve, particularly in mathematics. This is not now the case. The quality of teaching and 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008 learning is now good and is more consistent than previously. Improvements have involved ensuring that teachers develop their understanding of the use of data and making use of this to make sure that future learning is pitched at the right level. New tracking arrangements, particularly in English and mathematics are of good quality, though are not yet embedded in and science. Pupils are developing into secure and confident learners as a result of the school's improvement focus. Teachers invariably share the objectives of lessons, make clear what the pupils have to do to meet these and then, particularly in the best lessons, refer back to them

p.4

Grade: 2

during the lesson. Some excellent practice is emerging. For example, pupils assess their own work and that of other pupils. In addition, they are clear about their long-term targets and how to improve to reach them. However, this is not yet consistent throughout the school. Pupils' personal development is outstanding. This is because of the high quality of care and support that is provided. It is aided by the wide range of music opportunities which provide a strong basis for the pupils' good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. A very small number of parents expressed concerns about behaviour. There is no evidence of misbehaviour, however, and behaviour in lessons and around the school is excellent. Pupils agree that that poor behaviour is rare and is dealt with swiftly either by adults or the pupils themselves. As one school council member proudly announced, 'We make sure that everyone is happy in our

p.5

Grade: 2

school'. Relationships are excellent. Classrooms are calm and purposeful. All necessary procedures for child protection and safeguarding pupils are securely in place. There are good arrangements in place to support vulnerable pupils. Their needs are identified early and suitable programmes of support are put into place. Pupils thoroughly enjoy school and learning. They have a well-developed understanding of what is right and wrong and how to stay safe. Their understanding of the need to adopt a healthy lifestyle is outstanding. They appreciate the importance of a healthy diet and robust aerobic exercise. They say that they thoroughly enjoy the 'Swifts' after school clubs that provide sports activities each day. A large majority of pupils attend at least one of these sessions each week. The many opportunities for them to take responsibility are grasped by pupils. They raise money for local and national charities and

p.5

Grade: 2

particularly enjoy the new team arrangements. Their good numeracy, literacy and personal skills prepare them well for secondary education.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Embed the arrangements for tracking pupils' progress and making use of data particularly in science. ■ Continue the process of accelerating pupils' progress particularly in mathematics. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

14 May 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Greenfields Junior School,Hook,RG27 8DQ I really enjoyed visiting your school. Thank you very much for the friendly way you welcomed me and for your help in finding out about the school. Both you and your parents told me that you thoroughly enjoy school and that you feel safe and well cared for. I am not surprised. Yours is a good school and everybody who works there tries hard to help you to do well. Your teachers work hard to make sure that lessons are interesting and exciting. Your headteacher has done an excellent job to make sure that everyone helps you all to work and play together in such a friendly way and to make the school successful. I was very impressed with your excellent behaviour and your positive attitudes to each other. You work hard in lessons so that you learn lots of new things. Your progress is good and you attain above average standards in English, mathematics and science.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

One of the many things that the school councillors told me that made your school special was that you enjoy making sure that everyone is happy and learn well. I agree. Your teachers have also been helping by making sure that you know your targets well. I have asked Mrs Platt and your teachers to make sure that they keep a careful track of your progress in maths and science as well as they do in English. I have also asked that they make sure that you do as well in mathematics as you do in English and science. You can help by working hard to meet your targets. Thank you once again for being so helpful to me. With very best wishes for your future. Keith Sadler Lead Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Greenfields Junior School, 1 May 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion