Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Montgomery Primary School

Inspected 10 Dec 2008 · published 12 Jan 2009 · URN 113082

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Anne Newall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Dec 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Newall

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Montgomery Primary School

  • URN verified

    113082

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelypositivestrengthsenjoyexceptionallyeffectivehappystrong
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlyweaknessesbelowinconsistentinadequatelimitednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1789w+48
  • What needs to improve1553w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
3,317
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Montgomery Primary School Inspection report

p.1

113082 Unique Reference Number Devon Local Authority 311098 Inspection number 9–10 December 2008 Inspection dates Anne Newall Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare, managed by the governing body, was inspected under section 49 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3–11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 390 School (total) 52 Government funded early education provision for children aged 3 to the end of the EYFS 0 Childcare provision for children aged 0 to 3 years The governing body Appropriate authority Kathryn Wilson Chair Nigel Hughes Headteacher 21 June 2005 Date of previous school inspection 21 June 2005 Date of previous funded early education inspection Not previously inspected Date of previous childcare inspection Redvers Road School address St Thomas Exeter EX4 1BS 01392 273751 Telephone number 01392 494350 Fax number

p.1

3–11 Age group 9–10 December 2008 Inspection dates 311098 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. 2 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Montgomery Primary School is a larger than average primary school. Most pupils are White British and the proportion who speak English as an additional language has increased recently to approximately one in ten pupils. The percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals is average. The percentage of pupils with a statement of special educational needs is above average whilst the proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is below average. A small number of pupils have speech and language difficulties, and a few have behavioural, emotional or social problems. The school provides Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) provision for children in a maintained Nursery and Reception classes. The school provides a breakfast club, a lunchtime club for the Nursery children, and an after-school club, which are run independently of the governing body.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

The quality of education provided by Montgomery Primary School is satisfactory, in a caring environment where pupils are happy to come to school. The school has made satisfactory improvement since the last inspection. Achievement is satisfactory. Standards have been below average for a number of years, but the most recent data provided by the school for 2008 show that standards at the end of Key Stage 2 are now average, with pupils meeting challenging targets. This is due to procedures put in place by the school to identify variations in pupils' progress and provide appropriate support. However, assessment information is not always used effectively to plan lessons which match work closely to meet the needs of all pupils. Some pupils find the work too hard, whilst others find it too easy, resulting in uneven progress across the school. In addition, the use of marking for pupils and guidance on how to improve their

p.4

Grade: 3

work is inconsistent. Pupils speak highly of their teachers and support staff, and the mutual respect is evident from the good relationships which exist and the good behaviour of children. These contribute to the good personal development of the pupils. Most parents have a positive view of the school and appreciate the pastoral support provided. One parent described her son's increased self-esteem and confidence, and another is 'very impressed with the care and attention my child has received'. However, a small minority would welcome more information about their children's progress. This is an inclusive school; pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and pupils with English as an additional language, are well supported throughout the school and are encouraged to fully participate in all activities. The curriculum is suitably broad and is enriched by a range of visits, visitors and extra-curricular

p.4

Grade: 3

activities. New initiatives have been introduced to make lessons more engaging and lively, but these are not consistently used throughout the school. Governors provide good support, and their ability to monitor the work of the school and to provide challenge for the school's leaders is developing. The school works in partnership with other local schools and with agencies such as educational welfare and education advisers who provide support for the teaching of pupils who have English as an additional language. The school's capacity for further improvement is satisfactory, because the school's leaders have a satisfactory understanding of its strengths and weaknesses, and have correctly identified areas for improvement. Less well developed is the leaders' role in monitoring the impact of their actions upon teaching and learning. Consequently, teachers do not always receive guidance on how to improve their classroom practice.

p.4

Grade: 2

The Nursery and Reception classes provide a happy and safe environment for children to learn. They feel cared for and gain confidence because clear routines are established. Effective links with parents help to involve them in their children's care and education: an open session for both parents and children on early reading skills was especially helpful. The enthusiastic staff have comprehensive systems to assess and observe children and this helps to give a very accurate understanding of children's strengths. Good transition arrangements help children to settle quickly into school, interact well with the class teachers and gain confidence. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008 As a result of good teaching, children make good progress in their learning from their starting points, which are well below average in most areas of learning. The youngest children show a

p.4

Grade: 2

very good understanding of shape and space and aspects of mathematics, and speak French phrases with confidence. Strong emphasis is given to children's personal development and this means that their standards of behaviour are high. Children's language and social skills are less well developed on entry to the EYFS. Staff have provided increased opportunities for children to develop their speaking skills by encouraging them to justify their choices and explain what they are doing but these opportunities are still too limited. Staff are effective in supporting children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, many of whom reach the same standards as their peers. The school makes good use of a covered outdoor learning environment to further enrich children's experiences. Leadership and management of EYFS are good and there is close teamwork between staff.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the quality of teaching and learning by ensuring activities in lessons match the learning needs of all pupils. ■ Ensure senior leaders make more rigorous use of monitoring systems in order to provide teachers with guidance on how to improve and to sustain the recent improvement in standards. ■ Ensure that information about their progress is shared with pupils and that they are given guidance on how to improve their work. ■ In the EYFS, provide increased opportunities for children to develop their language and social skills. A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils make satisfactory progress from their well below average starting points. Standards reached by pupils have previously been low across the school. However, the most recent results show that standards at the end of Key Stage 1 are below average. Standards at the end of Year 6 have improved and are now average, because of well targeted support for pupils and higher expectations. Challenging targets are being used more effectively to reduce gaps in attainment. Despite most pupils reaching the expected Level 4, results in English and mathematics are lower than in science because smaller proportions reach the higher Level 5 in these subjects. Last year, the school focused on more closely tracking the progress made by pupils in each year group, leading to an increase in the numbers of pupils working at age-appropriate levels. For example, the intensive work in reading in Years 3 and 4 led to improved achievement for those

p.5

Grade: 3

pupils. Carefully targeted support for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and those with English as an additional language enables them to make progress in line with their peers nationally.

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' social and moral development is strong, and they have positive attitudes towards each other. Their spiritual development is promoted through regular assemblies led by the Initiative for Christian Education (ICE) team. Pupils understand the principles of living a healthy lifestyle, 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008 say that they feel safe in school, and report that they are free from bullying but that, if it happened, they would know to whom they should talk. The pupils show respect for one another and for adults, and their behaviour is good. They are encouraged to take responsibility to help with the smooth running of the school, for example the 'buddy' system helps to settle younger pupils who may be feeling insecure. Activities such as performances by the school choir and band demonstrate pupils' good contribution towards the local community, and the pupils are

p.5

Grade: 2

proud to support local and national charities. Attendance is satisfactory, and this is affected by a higher than average proportion of pupils who are persistently absent, despite the school's efforts to promote better attendance. Pupils are increasingly developing their awareness and understanding of life in a multicultural society. Pupils' preparation for their future lives is satisfactory.

p.6

Grade: 3

Teaching overall is satisfactory. Relationships between pupils and their teachers and teaching assistants are good. Where teaching is good, it is characterised by assessment which identifies the progress of individual pupils and builds on their learning in subsequent lessons. Teachers who are secure in their subject knowledge and provide work that is motivating, exciting and well paced engage the interest of pupils, who display positive attitudes as a result. Good use is made of interactive whiteboards in some classes to demonstrate teaching points or to act as visual reminders, for example in mathematics to highlight the connection between fractions and decimal fractions, and in design and technology work on designing and making bridges. Where teaching is satisfactory, it is characterised by activities which are not always well matched to the abilities of the pupils, and is not consistently meeting their needs, which occasionally

p.6

Grade: 3

leads to boredom and frustration. Pupils with additional learning needs are supported well and make progress, particularly in Key Stage 1. Teaching assistants are deployed carefully by the special needs coordinator, utilising their particular strengths and skills; for example, one teaching assistant who is a talented gymnast, helps pupils improve their coordination, whilst others who have received specialist training work with pupils to improve their speaking and listening skills. There is good support for the increasing number of pupils with English as an additional language.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is broad and balanced, with some strengths. The whole-school focus on Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) has had a positive influence upon pupils' personal development. There is a wide range of enrichment activities, and many pupils enjoy extra-curricular activities and the outdoor visits, for example the Year 2 visit to Dawlish Warren. Parents confirm that their children enjoy school, and are well cared for. Older pupils talk excitedly about the residential visit to France in Year 6, which gives them an opportunity to practise their language skills. Whilst steps have been taken to adjust the curriculum to make learning lively and engaging, for example the focus upon key skills, the impact of this is not yet clear enough upon pupils' achievement and the curriculum does not yet meet the needs of all learners. It is noticeable where good use is made of cross-curricular links to bring learning alive and keep

p.6

Grade: 3

pupils interested, but this is not consistent across the school. French is a strength of the school, with pupils from the EYFS to Year 6 benefiting, and video conferencing promotes the speaking and listening skills of some pupils. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.6

Grade: 3

The school keeps pupils safe, and all legal procedures for child protection and safeguarding are in place. Teachers and support staff know the pupils well, and encourage them to enjoy their lessons through good use of praise and effective behaviour management strategies. Pupils have very good relationships with staff, who they say they can talk to about any anxieties, and parents confirm that the staff are approachable. The school works well with parents and local agencies to ensure that pupils are happy and able to make progress. There are some examples of good use of marking comments and individual targets to help pupils improve their work, but this is inconsistent across the school. Pupils are rarely involved in assessing their own work and are often unclear about their achievements and what they need to do to improve. Systems for setting targets are not fully embedded or regularly shared with pupils and consequently have limited impact. Support for pupils with learning difficulties

p.7

Grade: 3

and/or disabilities is good and includes the involvement of parents and other professionals such as speech therapists and the communication/interaction team.

p.7

Grade: 3

The headteacher provides a satisfactory direction for the school's improvement and has united the staff team in the drive to raise standards. School self-evaluation is satisfactory. Recent improvements to the systems to track pupils' progress have given senior leaders a much more accurate picture of the school's strengths and weaknesses. These systems are more focused on raising standards and have led to improvements in the proportion of pupils working at expected levels by raising expectations. Subject leaders are being encouraged to develop their leadership skills and are providing increasing support for colleagues. Senior leaders are not fully involved in the monitoring of teaching and monitoring fails to provide sufficient guidance to class teachers to enable them to improve their practice. Priorities for improvement are accurately reflected in the school development plan but these plans do not consistently include

p.7

Grade: 3

clear links to raising standards. The school makes a satisfactory contribution to community cohesion through activities in school and the local community, although pupils' understanding of multicultural issues is less well developed. The school strives to ensure that every child is fully included, and the impact of this is evident, for example, in the way in which pupils with English as an additional language are helped to settle and learn. However, the school has not fully achieved its goals: some aspects, such as the progress that pupils make, are improving but school leaders readily acknowledge that there is still further to go. Governors are well informed about the work of the school and have been instrumental in securing funding for a new building. They are supportive and work closely with the headteacher, and with increased access to assessment data, have set challenging academic targets. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

needs of learners?

Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well being? 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

EYFS?

2 How well do children in the EYFS achieve? How good are the overall personal development and well-being of the children in the EYFS? 2 How effectively are children in the EYFS helped to learn and develop? 2 How effectively is the welfare of children in the EYFS promoted? 2 How effectively is provision in the EYFS led and managed?

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress

p.9

Achievement and standards

1 Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 The extent to which learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.10

learners' needs?

How well do the curriculum and other activities meet the range of needs and interests of learners? 3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.10

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation 3 How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination eliminated 3 How well does the school contribute to community cohesion? How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

11 December 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Montgomery Primary School, Exeter, EX4 1BS Thank you so much for the warm welcome you gave me and the other inspectors when we visited your school this week. We know you were very excited about your Christmas dinner and performance! We particularly enjoyed talking to you about your work, and the other activities you do in school. You certainly like the new equipment in your playground. We were impressed by the sensible and polite way you answered our questions, and by your good behaviour in class and around the school. We think that Montgomery Primary School is a satisfactory school which is getting better. Most of you work hard and enjoy being in school, although sometimes some of you are given work to do which is too easy or too hard, and you get a bit frustrated. Some of the youngest pupils find it difficult to talk to and play with each other at first. Many of you are making satisfactory

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

progress now with your work. We agree with your opinion that you like your teachers and the other adults in school, who care well for you. You like to eat sensibly and exercise, so that you lead healthy lives. To help you make better progress in your work, we have asked your headteacher and teachers to:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Plan more good lessons which you find interesting and lively, and which match your level of ability, so that teaching and learning are improved and you make better progress. ■ Keep a close eye on the progress of each pupil, and talk to you about your work so that you know what to do to achieve as well as possible. ■ Give the youngest children more opportunities to talk to each other and to adults, and to improve their social skills. You can help by always trying your best and by talking to your teacher about how to improve your work. With our very best wishes for your future Yours faithfully Anne Newall Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Montgomery Primary School, 9–10 December 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion